The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Genemapper software v5

Manufactured by Thermo Fisher Scientific
Sourced in United States

GeneMapper software v5.0 is a data analysis software designed for use with genetic analysis instruments. It provides core functionalities for the processing and analysis of genetic data generated from these instruments.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

30 protocols using genemapper software v5

1

FLT3-ITD Mutation Detection by PCR and Capillary Electrophoresis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
PCR followed by fragment analysis by capillary electrophoresis (ABI 3500 Genetic Analyzer) was performed for FLT3-ITD testing. The PCR was performed starting from 50 ng of gDNA in a total reaction volume of 25 μL, containing the following: 1U of Taq DNA Polymerase, 0.5 μL dNTP mix (10 mM), 1× PCR Buffer, 2 mM MgCl2, and 0.5 μM of each primer. The primers for ITD detection were fluorescently labeled: 5′-HEX-GCAATTTADGTATGAAAGCCAGC-3′ (forward), and 5′-FAM-CTTTCAGCATTTTGACGGCAACC-3′ (reverse) [33 (link)]. The cycling conditions were as follows: denaturation for 3 min at 94 °C; 40 cycles of 45 s at 94 °C, 60 s at 61°C, 90 s at 72 °C; and final extension for 15 min at 72 °C. The amplification products were denatured with Hi-Di Formamide and migrated on ABI 3500 Genetic Analyzer (Thermo Fisher Scientific), using the GeneScan 600 LIZ Standard (Thermo Fisher Scientific) for size evaluation. The data were analyzed with the GeneMapper Software v5 (Thermo Fisher Scientific); the amplicons larger than the expected wild type (330 bp) were interpreted as positive for the ITD variant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Comprehensive Genomic Sequencing of AS Locus

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The genomic region from upstream of AS exon 5 to the XL DMR of the twins was PCR-amplified with 46 amplicons and Sanger-sequenced. PCR amplicons were designed to overlap each other. Especially, the region from upstream of AS exon 5 to exon NESP55 was completely Sanger-sequenced in all family members. In other regions, all amplicons containing the twins’ informative heterozygous SNPs were sequenced in other family members. PCR reactions were performed using KOD ONE (TOYOBO), a high-fidelity DNA polymerase. Sequencing reactions were performed using the BigDye Terminator v3.1 Cycle Sequencing Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific), and the samples were analyzed by a 3730xl DNA Analyzer (Thermo Fisher Scientific). For fragment analysis, PCR reactions were performed using 6FAM-labeled primers, and the products were analyzed by a 3730xl DNA Analyzer using GeneMapper Software v5 (Thermo Fisher Scientific).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Microsatellite Genotyping Using Genetic Analyzer

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Genotyping of microsatellites was performed on a 3500 Genetic Analyzer (Applied Biosystems) using POP-7 polymer™ and 50 cm capillary array. Genotyping reaction included 0.5 μl of 1:25–1:40 PCR or 1:10–1:80 RPA product, 0.5 μl of 1:4 GENESCAN-600 LIZ size standard and 9 μl of Hi-Di™ Formamide (Applied Biosystems) and was heated 5 min at 95°C then cooled on ice before injection. Fragment length analysis was performed using the Microsatellite Default analysis module of GeneMapper® software v5.0 (Applied Biosystems). The stutter ratio (SR) was calculated as the ratio of peak intensities of the n – 1 stutter over the n genuine allele expressed in percentage.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Microsatellite Genotyping of Cottus Species

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The seven published primer pairs, which were originally developed for the European bullhead species Cottus gobio [43 (link), 44 (link)], were used for microsatellite genotyping of our study species. Seven polymorphic nuclear microsatellite loci were chosen, including Cgo56, Cgo05, Cgo18, Cgo22 [43 (link)], Cott138, Cott207 and Cott112 [44 (link)]. The forward primers were labelled with fluorescent dye (FAM, NED, VIC and PET). PCR reactions were carried out as described for amplifying the mtDNA control region. PCR cycling conditions comprised an initial denaturation phase at 94 °C for 1 min, 35 cycles of 94 °C for 1 min, 57 °C–64 °C for 1 min, 72 °C for 1 min and a final extension step at 72 °C for 20 min. The PCR products were electrophoresed on an ABI 3730xl automated DNA sequencer (Applied Biosystems). Fragment sizes were determined to a ROX 500-bp size standard (ABI), as detected using GENEMAPPER software v5.0 (Applied Biosystems).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Microsatellite Genotyping for Population Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Twelve distinct polymorphic microsatellites markers were used to genotype the samples using a hemi-nested PCR protocol described by Anderson et al., (1999) [31 (link)] with slight modification. The markers included Poly α, TA40, ARA2, TA87, TAA81, TAI, TA42, TA60, 2490, PfG377, TA109 and PfPK2. Briefly, the primary reaction was carried out in a solution of 15 µL total containing 200 nM dNTP, 3 mM MgCl2, 0.1 µM each of the unlabeled forward and reverse primer pairs, 0.05 U One Taq DNA Polymerase (New England Biolab, Ipswich, MA, USA) and about 30–50 ng of gDNA template. The secondary reaction contained the same reagents as the primary reaction with the exception of the primer pair that included 0.3 µM of a fluorescently labeled forward primer (6-FAM, HEX and Atto 565) and 0.1 µM of the unlabeled reverse primer used in the primary reaction (Table S1 in Supplementary Materials) with 3 µL of the primary reaction product in a final volume of 15 µL [31 (link)]. The fluorescently-labeled PCR products were separated using an Applied Biosystems 3130 series Genetic Analyzer and visualized using the GeneMapper software v 5.0 (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Genotyping Microsatellite Markers to Examine RAD51C Variant

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Polymorphic microsatellite markers (D17S666, D17S1853, D17S1606, D17S1161, D17S1604, D17S923, D17S808, and D17S794) flanking the recurrent RAD51C c.571 + 4A > G variant were genotyped in available relatives (Table S3), alleles were scored with GeneMapper Software v5.0 (Applied Biosystems), and haplotypes were constructed according to standard procedures (Abdelfatah et al., 2013). Specific alleles residing on the disease‐associated haplotype were compared with genotypes of a positive singleton case and population controls. Estimated variant age was calculated using standard procedures (Machado et al., 2007), with genetic distances inferred from the deCODE genetic map (Halldorsson et al., 2019) (Data S1).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

H3 Mutation Detection by PCR and Sanger Sequencing

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Template DNA was amplified using H3F3A primers which were designed to cover the region encoding Lys27 and Gly34 in Histone H3.3 (forward: TGGCTCGTACAAAGCAGACT, reverse: ATGGATACATACAAGAGAGACT). HIST1H3B primers amplified the region encoding Lys27 and Gly34 in Histone H3.1 (forward: GTTTTGCCATGGCTCGTACT, reverse: AAGCGAAGATCGGTCTTGAA). PCR products were separated on 2% agarose gel then purified using Gene JET PCR Purification kit (ThermoFisher Scientific). Sanger sequencing was performed on the amplified DNA for detection of H3 (K27M) and (G34V/R) mutations, using the 3500 Series Genetic Analyzers (Applied Biosystems). Sequencing data was generated using Gene Mapper Software v5.0 (Applied Biosystems). Sequencing chromatograms were edited and visualized with Snap Gene software (from GSL Biotech; available at snapgene.com).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Y-STR Genotyping with PowerPlex Y23

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The samples were genotyped for 23 Y-STR loci using the PowerPlex® Y23 System (Promega Corporation, Madison, WI, USA). Amplification was performed according to the manufacturer’s recommended protocol, and PCR products were separated and detected on an ABI3500 Genetic Analyzer (Applied Biosystems, Carlsbad, CA, USA). Genotyping was performed using the GeneMapper™ Software v5.0 (Applied Biosystems), and alleles were assigned based on the allelic ladder provided with the kit.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Microsatellite Loci Amplification and Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Seven polymorphic nuclear microsatellite loci were amplified with the published primers including SHORN18, SHORN26, SHORN27, SHORN30, SHORN31, SHORN34 and SHORN 4127 (link). Each of the forward primers was labelled with a fluorescent dye (FAM, HEX and TET). PCR reactions were conducted as described for the mtDNA cox3 gene. PCR cycling conditions were carried out as suggested in a previous study27 (link). The PCR products were electrophoresed on an ABI 3730xl automated DNA sequencer (Applied Biosystems). Fragment sizes were determined with the ROX 500 bp size standard (ABI) using GENEMAPPER software v5.0 (Applied Biosystems).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Microsatellite Linkage Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Microsatellite markers within the ±1 Mb flanking the gene being investigated were selected from the Genethon and Marshfield genetic map for linkage analysis. Markers and primer sequences are shown in Table S1. PCR reactions were performed (reaction conditions are available upon request). One μL PCR product was added to 10 μL of a mixture of GeneScan 500 LIZ Size Standards (Applied Biosystems, Inc.) and formamide, and analyzed on an ABI3730XL Genetic Analyzer (Applied Biosystems, Inc.). The results were analyzed using GeneMapper software V5.0 (Applied Biosystems, Inc.).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!