The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

24 protocols using cuy21edit

1

In Utero Electroporation of Somatosensory Cortex

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Standard bipolar in utero electroporation of the somatosensory cortex was performed as previously described (Bony et al., 2013 (link); Szczurkowska et al., 2016 (link)). Timed-pregnant Sprague Dawley rats (Harlan Italy SRL, Correzzana, Italy) were anaesthetized at E17.5 with isoflurane (induction, 3.5%; surgery, 2.5%), and uterine horns were exposed by laparotomy. Expression vectors (1–2 μg μl−1/Vector in water) and dye Fast Green (0.3 mg ml−1; Sigma, St. Louis, MO) were injected (5–6 μl) through the uterine wall into one of the embryo’s lateral ventricle by a 30-G needle (Pic indolor, Grandate, Italy). Each embryo’s head was held between tweezer-type electrodes (10 mm diameter; Nepa Gene, Chiba, Japan) across the uterus and five electrical pulses (amplitude, 50 V; duration, 50 ms; intervals, 100 ms) were delivered with a square-wave electroporation generator (CUY21EDIT; Nepa Gene). Uterine horns were returned into the abdominal cavity, and embryos continued their normal development.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

In Utero Electroporation of Somatosensory Cortex

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Standard bipolar in utero electroporation of the somatosensory cortex was performed as previously described (Bony et al., 2013 (link); Szczurkowska et al., 2016 (link)). Timed-pregnant Sprague Dawley rats (Harlan Italy SRL, Correzzana, Italy) were anaesthetized at E17.5 with isoflurane (induction, 3.5%; surgery, 2.5%), and uterine horns were exposed by laparotomy. Expression vectors (1–2 μg μl−1/Vector in water) and dye Fast Green (0.3 mg ml−1; Sigma, St. Louis, MO) were injected (5–6 μl) through the uterine wall into one of the embryo’s lateral ventricle by a 30-G needle (Pic indolor, Grandate, Italy). Each embryo’s head was held between tweezer-type electrodes (10 mm diameter; Nepa Gene, Chiba, Japan) across the uterus and five electrical pulses (amplitude, 50 V; duration, 50 ms; intervals, 100 ms) were delivered with a square-wave electroporation generator (CUY21EDIT; Nepa Gene). Uterine horns were returned into the abdominal cavity, and embryos continued their normal development.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Targeted In Utero Electroporation of Somatosensory Cortex

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
IUE targeting the somatosensory cortex was performed using our previously published methods with minor modifications20 ,21 (link). Pregnant C57/BL6 mice were anesthetized at embryonic day 15 (E15) by intraperitoneal administration of a mixed solution of Ketamine HCl (100 mg/kg), Xylazine HCl (7.5 mg/kg), and Buprenorphine HCl (0.05 mg/kg). After the uterine horn was exposed by laparotomy, the shRNA plasmid (1 µg/µl) together with CAG promoter-driven GFP expression plasmids (1 µg/µl) (molar ratio, approximately 1:1) were injected into the lateral ventricles with a glass micropipette made from a micropillary tube (Narishige, Cat #GD-1), and electroporated into the VZ of the CP at E15. C11orf46 expression constructs (1 µg/µl) were also co-introduced for rescue experiments. For in vivo epigenomic editing, CAG-dCas9-ST (1 µg/µl), scFv-C11orf46 (1 µg/µl) and sgRNAs (1 µg/µl) together with shRNAs and GFP expression plasmid will be introduced at E15. For overexpression of Sema6a, CAG-Sema6a (2 µg/µl) or tdTomato (1 µg/µl) with GFP expression plasmid will be introduced at E15. For electroporation, Electrode pulses (40 V; 50 ms) were charged four times at intervals of 950 ms with an electroporator (Nepagene, Cat #CUY21EDIT). All experiments were performed in accordance with the institutional guidelines for animal experiments of Johns Hopkins University.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

In utero Electroporation of Mouse Brains

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
DNA transfer into E13.5 CD1 mouse brains in utero was performed using a Nepagene CUY21EDIT electroporator. 2.5 μg of DNA constructs in PBS were injected into the lateral ventricle using an orally controlled capillary micropipette. Five electric pulses (33V, 50ms pulse followed by 950ms gap) were delivered. Embryos were harvested at E15.5 fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde with 30% sucrose dehydration. 0.5 μg shRNA-Botch-pCAG-EGFP or shRNA-DsRed-pCAG-EGFP was co-injected with 2 μg either Mock (pCAG empty vector) or pCAG-BotchR or pCAG-BotchR-E115A or pCAG-Botch plasmids. 1 μg pCAG-EGFP was co-injected with 1 μg of either Mock (pCAG empty vector) or pCAG-Botch or pCAG-Botch-E115A plasmid.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

In Utero Electroporation for Gene Delivery

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were transfected in vivo through in utero electroporation, as described previously (Inoue et al., 2012 (link)). Briefly, plasmids carrying monomeric red fluorescent protein (mRFP) downstream of a CAG promoter (Addgene, MA, USA) were prepared using the EndoFree Plasmid Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). Pregnant mice and rats were anesthetized with sodium pentobarbital (50 mg/kg intraperitoneally) at E14.5 and E15.5, respectively, and their uterine horns were exposed. Plasmid DNA was dissolved in phosphate buffered saline (PBS) at a final concentration of 0.5 μg/μl with Fast Green (final concentration 0.05% [v/v]). Plasmids were injected into the lateral ventricle using a glass micropipette and a controlled pipette system (IM-30, Narishige, Tokyo, Japan). The micropipettes were generated from glass capillaries (outer diameter 1.0 mm; Harvard Apparatus, South Natick, MA, USA) that were pulled using a P-97 micropipette puller (Sutter Instrument Co., Novato, CA, USA). Electric pulses were produced by an electroporator (CUY21EDIT; NepaGene, Ichikawa, Japan) and delivered by a round plate forceps-type electrode with a 5-mm diameter (CUY650P5; NepaGene). Electric pulses (43 V, 50 ms) were applied five times at intervals of 950 ms. The uterine horns were then returned to the abdomen.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Overexpression of C7 Variants in Glioma Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
U251 glioma cells and HM cells were introduced from Kunming Cell Bank, Kunming Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences. The U251 cells were engineered to stably express mutant APP K670N/M671L (U251-APP) so that they would produce Aβ42 under doxorubicin induction [32 ,37 (link)]. We overexpressed wild type and mutant p.K420Q of C7 in these two cell lines to characterize their potential roles. Briefly, U251-APP cells were cultured in Roswell RPMI-1640 medium (HyClone, #C11875500BT) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (Gibco-BRL; #10099–141), 100 U/ml penicillin and 100 mg/ml streptomycin in 5% CO2 at 37°C. HM cells were maintained in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (Gibco-BRL; #11965–092) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (Gibco-BRL; #10099–141). Transfection of empty vector (pReceiver-M14 [Cytomegalovirus promoter, 3 × Flag], GeneCopoeia, Inc.), or C7 wild type and mutant p.K420Q expression vectors, was performed using an electroporator (CUY21EDIT, Nepa gene Co., Japan) following the manufacturer's instructions. In brief, cells were trypsinized and washed three times with Opti-MEM medium (Gibco-BRL). Around 1 × 106 cells were resuspended in 100 μl Opti-MEM medium, and electroporated with 10 μg plasmids. Transfected cells were seeded in prewarmed growth medium for 72 h in 5% CO2 at 37°C before being harvested.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Electroporation-Assisted Transdermal Plasmid Delivery

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Skin was shaved at the site of injection. Each animal received id injections of 100 µl (1 mg/ml) of auxo-GTU®-multiHIV plasmid with or without EP. Phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) (100 µL) was injected as a control. EP was performed with a portable pulse generator (CUY21 EDIT; Nepa Gene, Ichikawa, Japan) and tweezer electrodes (6 pulses of 10 msec with output current 300–600 mA)51 (link). For imaging studies of antigen expression, 100 µl (250 µg) of auxo-GTU®-Luc-EGFP plasmid was injected.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

In utero electroporation of optogenetic and fluorescent markers

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
CAG:hM3Dq:IRES:GFP, CAG:hM3Dq:IRES:RFP or CamKII-ACE2N-mNeon-4AA were expressed in pyramidal cells via in utero electroporation. In utero electroporation was performed in E15.5 pregnant mice. Females were anaesthetised with isoflurane 2.5% before the abdomen was opened and the uterine horns exposed. DNA was delivered to the embryos via injection into the lateral ventricles with a glass micropipette. A total of 0.5-1 μL of DNA solution was injected into each embryo. The DNA solution contained Fast Green (0.3% (w/v)) and DNA in TE buffer (1500-2000 ng/ml). Five square electric pulses (30 V, 50 ms) were passed at 1 s intervals using a squarewave electroporator (CUY21EDIT; NEPA GENE). All successfully electroporated mice were included in all analyses.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

In Utero Gene Electroporation in Mouse Embryos

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Plasmids were purified with the Endofree plasmid maxi kit (Sigma-Aldrich), injected in the lateral ventricle of E14.5 embryos in utero, and electroporated as previously described (Mire et al., 2012 (link)) using an electroporator (CUY21 Edit; Nepagene). Embryos were harvested in L15-glucose 48 h after electroporation. Brains were dissected and open or cut in the vibratome; the electroporated parts or the 100-µm sections were fixed in 10% ice-cold TCA for 20 min for pERM staining or in 4% PFA for 2 h for other stainings and processed for immunofluorescence as described previously (Deck et al., 2013 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

In Utero Electroporation of Plasmids

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Plasmids were transfected by in utero electroporation using previously described methods.15 Briefly, E14 pregnant female C57BL/6 mice were anesthetized by an intraperitoneal injection of 2,2,2‐tribromoethanol (200–300 mg/kg body weight) prior to the experiments. A total of 1 μg of plasmid was injected by transuterine pressure microinjection into the lateral ventricle of the embryos by delivering five electrical pulses (40 V, 50 ms duration) at intervals of 950 ms using a square‐pulse electroporator (CUY21EDIT; Nepa Gene) and a tweezer‐type electrode with disc electrodes (5 mm in diameter) at the tip (CUY650‐5; Nepa Gene, Chiba, Japan). For the analysis of migration and cell shape, the brains of mice were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde/0.1 M phosphate buffer (pH 7.4), cut coronally into 100 μm slices with a Vibratome (VT1000S; Leica Microsystems), and imaged using a laser‐scanning confocal microscope (LSM 5 PASCAL; Carl‐Zeiss).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!