The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Sas jmp version 11

Manufactured by SAS Institute
Sourced in United States

SAS JMP version 11 is a statistical discovery software that provides interactive and visual data analysis capabilities. It offers a range of statistical techniques and graphical tools for exploring, visualizing, and modeling data.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

Lab products found in correlation

9 protocols using sas jmp version 11

1

Statistical Analysis of Experimental Data

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All statistical analyses were performed using SAS JMP version 11.0 (SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, NC, USA). Normality was checked using the Shapiro‐Wilk tests. Normally distributed data are presented as means and standard deviations. Data that were non‐normally distributed are presented as medians and ranges. Differences between groups were determined using the Wilcoxon nonparametric test and the chi‐square test.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Comprehensive Statistical Analyses of Zebrafish Embryo Development

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Statistical analyses were performed using SAS JMP version 11.0 (SAS Institute). Mortality and hatching rates in the FET were analyzed by Cox’s proportional hazards analysis. The developmental failure rate of zebrafish embryos at 96 hpf (hours post-fertilization) was analyzed using Fisher’s exact test. The significance level was set to α = 0.05. To correct for multiple testing, the Holm–Bonferroni method was applied to adjust the significance levels. Data from the micronucleus tests were tested with a paired t test. Statistical analysis of the histopathological data was performed using the Likelihood ratio test.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Comparative Biomarker Analysis in Statin Therapy

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Comparisons between the two groups (atorvastatin vs. placebo) were performed using Student t test for normally-distributed continuous variables and Wilcoxon rank sum test if the distribution was non-normal. To assess changes within each group, paired t-test or Wilcoxon signed rank test was performed, depending on normality of distribution. Pearson correlation coefficient was used to assess relationships of sST2, Galectin-3, GDF-15 with other parameters. Two-tailed probability values are reported, and statistical significance was assumed when p< .05. Means and standard deviations (SD) are reported to describe changes in continuous variables with normal distribution; otherwise, medians and interquartile ranges (IQR) are used. For analysis of GDF-15, two outliers based on the Dixon criteria were excluded. All statistical analyses were performed using SAS JMP version 11 (SAS Institute, Cary, North Carolina).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Survival Analysis of Gastrectomy vs. Non-Gastrectomy

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The clinical characteristics of the groups (gastrectomy or nongastrectomy) were compared using a Chi-square test for categorical variables and a Student's t-test for continuous variables. Progression-free survival was the time interval between the treatment initiation date and the date of disease progression, relapse, or the last follow-up [15 (link)]. Overall survival was calculated from the treatment initiation date to death from any cause or the last follow-up date [15 (link)]. Both the relapse-free survival curve and the overall survival curve were created using the Kaplan-Meier method. Cox regression model was used for multivariate analyses of overall survival. Statistical analysis was carried out using SPSS version 18 for Windows (IBM Corporation, Armonk, New York) and SAS/JMP version 11 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC). Data are expressed as means ± standard deviation. All statistical tests were 2-sided, and the differences were considered statistically significant at a P value less than 0.05.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Metabolic Effects of Dietary Fats

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The results were expressed as mean ± SD. Temporal changes in blood glucose, triglyceride, FFA, h-CRP, and urinary 8-OHdG were analyzed by repeated measures analysis of variance. Statistical significance was determined by comparing the WR diet with the BR diet before and after ingestion by paired t-test. In this study, the difference was regarded as significant if p < 0.05 in a 2-sided test. Statistical software SAS JMP version 11 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA) was used for statistical analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Postprandial Metabolic Responses

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The results are expressed as mean ± standard deviation. Temporal changes in plasma glucose, triglyceride and FFA, and serum CPR levels from the fasting state up to 180 minutes after ingestion were evaluated by paired Student's t-tests. When the variables did not exhibit a normal distribution, the variables were subjected to the Wilcoxon's-rank sum test to compare two groups. The differences between the changes in WR and BR diet were evaluated by unpaired Student's t-tests, and Welch's t-tests were employed for analysis if equal variance was not assumed. Unpaired t-tests were used to compare the IAUC of plasma glucose and serum CPR levels between WR and BR diet. In this study, the difference was regarded as significant if the p-value was < 0.05 in a two-sided test. Statistical software SAS JMP version 11 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA) was used for statistical analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Comparative Statistical Analysis Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Results are expressed as mean±SD. Numerical data were compared between groups using the unpaired t tests, and Welch’s t test was used for analysis if equal variances were not assumed. Pearson’s correlation coefficient was used for correlation analyses. In this study, two-sided P<0.05 was considered significant. All statistical analyses were performed with SAS JMP version 11 (SAS Institute, Inc. Cary, NC, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Survival Analysis of Gastric Cancer

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The clinical characteristics of the groups (with or without adjuvant chemotherapy) were compared using a Chi square test for categorical variables and a Student’s t test for continuous variables. Relapse-free survival was the time interval between the gastrectomy date and the date of disease relapse. Overall survival was calculated from the diagnosis to date of death from any cause or the last follow-up date. Both the relapse-free survival curve and the overall survival curve were created using the Kaplan–Meier method. Statistical analysis was carried out using SPSS version 18 for Windows (IBM Corporation, Armonk, NY, USA) and SAS/JMP version 11 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA). Data are expressed as mean ± SD. All statistical tests were two-sided, and the differences were considered statistically significant at a P value <0.05.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Evaluating Insulin Therapy Predictors

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All data are presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD). To compare the MTT data over time, we used a repeated measures of analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Dunnett’s multiple comparison. Numerical data were compared between groups with a t test or Mann–Whitney U test. Pearson’s correlation coefficient was used for correlation analyses. We used receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis to analyze the factors involved in insulin therapy and to calculate the sensitivity and specificity with respect to each optimal cutoff. To identify predictive risk factors for insulin therapy, we performed a multivariate logistic regression analysis and calculated odds ratios with 95% confidence interval. In this study, two-sided P < 0.05 was considered significant. All statistical analyses were performed using SAS JMP version 11 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!