The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

4 protocols using ab154168

1

Dystrophin C-terminus Western Blot

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Dp116 was analyzed by Western blotting, as described [25 (link)]. Blots were incubated overnight with a 1:1000 dilution of rabbit polyclonal antibody directed against the C-terminal domain of human dystrophin (ab154168; Abcam, Cambridge, UK), followed by incubation with anti-rabbit IgG secondary antibody (GE Healthcare). As a loading control, membranes were incubated with a 1:4000 dilution of GAPDH antibody (2118S; Cell Signaling Technology Inc.), followed by incubation with anti-mouse IgG secondary antibody (GE Healthcare). Immunoreactive bands were detected with Immobilon Forte Western HRP Substrate (Merck Millipore, MA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Quantitative Dystrophin Measurement in Muscle

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Protein was extracted from muscle tissues using mechanical bead rupture in lysis buffer consisting of 9% SDS, 75 mM Tris (pH 7), 5% 2-mercaptoethanol, and HALT protease inhibitors (78425, Thermo Fisher Scientific) and normalized by tissue mass. ProteinSimple Jess was used for capillary electrophoresis along with immunodetection using anti-dystrophin (Ab154168, 1:1,000; Abcam, Cambridge, UK) and anti-αactinin (MAB8279, 1:100; R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN, USA). A standard curve was included for each experiment to allow quantification, which consisted of ratios of C57BL/10 murine lysate diluted with mdx murine lysate from the respective muscle tissue. ProteinSimple Jess reagents were used as follows and according to the manufacturer’s protocols: 66- 440-kDa separation module (SM-W008); dystrophin was detected using the antirabbit detection module (DM-001 or 043-426 when paired with DM-002 for α-actinin detection), and α-actinin was detected with either the anti-mouse near-infrared detection module (DM-009) or the anti-mouse detection module (DM-002). A Gaussian fit was used for each peak for quantification, and the ratio of dystrophin to α-actinin was interpolated to the standard curve for each experiment.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Western Blot Analysis of Muscle Proteins

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For western blot analysis, 100 mg of muscle was collected, physically disrupted and homogenized with a pestle in the presence of silicon dioxide powder and 1 ml of lysis buffer [75 mM Tris-HCl (pH 6.8), 10% SDS, 20% glycerol, 5% mercaptan, 0.001% bromophenol blue] and incubated at 95°C for 10 min to denature proteins. Each well on a precast mini-protean TGX 4-15% gel (Bio-Rad) was loaded with 5 μg of total protein. Proteins were transferred onto a nitrocellulose membrane using a standard wet transfer in Mini Trans-Blot Cell (Bio-Rad) using the manufacturer's protocol. Nonspecific binding was blocked by incubating the membranes in 5% dry milk in PBS for 3 h. Antibodies against target proteins (ab154168 1:1000, ab15277 1:400, ab188873 1:1000, ab189254 1:1000, ab15200 1:200, Abcam; NCL-b-DG 1:200, Novocastra; sc-14176 1:200, sc-304 1:200, Santa Cruz Biotechnology) or a rabbit monoclonal anti-actin antibody (A2103 1:10,000, Sigma-Aldrich) diluted in 1% dry milk in PBS were used for protein detection. Incubation with each antibody was carried out overnight at 4°C, followed by washes and incubation with corresponding horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-conjugated secondary antibodies (1/3000) for 1 h at room temperature and further washes in PBS. Enhanced chemiluminescence was used for the detection of protein bands, and images were obtained and analyzed on a C-DiGit Blot Scanner.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Protein Expression Analysis in TA Muscle

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Frozen TA muscle sections were lysed in RIPA buffer (50 mM Tris–HCl pH 7.4, 1% NP-40, 0.5% Na-deoxycholate, 0.1% sodium dodecyl sulphate (SDS), 150 mM NaCl, 2 mM EDTA, and 50 mM NaF), and the protein extracts were subsequently separated on SDS–polyacrylamide gels. After the electrophoresis, proteins were electroblotted onto polyvinylidene fluoride membranes, followed by staining with Ponceau S staining solution (0.1% (w/v) Ponceau S in 5% (v/v) acetic acid). Then, membranes were blocked with 5% skimmed milk/PBS for 1 h. Perilipin, p16, and dystrophin protein were detected by staining with anti-perilipin antibody (1:1000, rabbit, #3470; Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, MA, USA), anti-p16 antibody (1:4000, rabbit, ab211542; Abcam, Cambridge, UK), and anti-dystrophin antibody (1:400, rabbit, ab154168, detecting aa3650 to C-terminus; Abcam), respectively, followed by incubation with anti-rabbit IgG horseradish peroxidase-labelled second antibody (1:8000, goat, 111–035-144; Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratory). Bands were visualised using an ECL western blotting analysis system (GE Healthcare Life Science, Buckinghamshire, UK).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!