The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

41 protocols using toc 5000

1

Rhizosphere DOM Fractionation and Characterization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The DOM in the rhizosphere of S. alfredii was extracted following the procedures suggested by Jones and Willett (2006) with minor modi cations, wherein 2.5 g of the rhizosphere soil was mixed with 25 mL of distilled water and shaken at 200 rpm for 120 min. The extracts were centrifuged at 10,000 × g for 20 min, and the recovered supernatant was sieved using 0.45-µm lters. A total organic carbon analyzer (TOC-5000, Shimadzu, Japan) was used to measure the dissolved organic carbon in the ltrate. Leenheer and Croue (2003) developed a dissolved organic carbon fractionation method that classi ed dissolved organics into six fractionations, including hydrophilic acid, hydrophilic base, hydrophilic neutral, hydrophobic acid, hydrophobic base, and hydrophobic neutral based on their polarity, alkaline-acidic properties, and speci c compound characteristics. The DOM fractionation was performed according to the method suggested by Leenheer and Croue (2003) , and the six DOM fractions were measured using the total organic carbon analyzer (TOC-5000, Shimadzu, Japan).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Rhizosphere DOM Fractionation and Characterization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The DOM in the rhizosphere of S. alfredii was extracted following the procedures suggested by Jones and Willett (2006) with minor modi cations, wherein 2.5 g of the rhizosphere soil was mixed with 25 mL of distilled water and shaken at 200 rpm for 120 min. The extracts were centrifuged at 10,000 × g for 20 min, and the recovered supernatant was sieved using 0.45-µm lters. A total organic carbon analyzer (TOC-5000, Shimadzu, Japan) was used to measure the dissolved organic carbon in the ltrate. Leenheer and Croue (2003) developed a dissolved organic carbon fractionation method that classi ed dissolved organics into six fractionations, including hydrophilic acid, hydrophilic base, hydrophilic neutral, hydrophobic acid, hydrophobic base, and hydrophobic neutral based on their polarity, alkaline-acidic properties, and speci c compound characteristics. The DOM fractionation was performed according to the method suggested by Leenheer and Croue (2003) , and the six DOM fractions were measured using the total organic carbon analyzer (TOC-5000, Shimadzu, Japan).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Soil Organic Carbon Fractionation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For the DOM measurement, the dried soil samples were pulverized and sieved through 0.15 mm meshes to eliminate brous roots. The DOM was extracted according to Jones and Willett (2006) . In Brief, 2.5 g of the sieved substrate was shaken in 25 mL of deionized water for 2 h at a constant speed (200 rpm). After centrifugation (10,000 × g, 20 min), the suspension was ltered through a 0.45-µm membrane, and the concentration of the dissolved organic carbon in the ltrate was analyzed using a Shimadzu organic carbon analyzer (TOC-5000, Japan). Six DOM fractionations, such as hydrophobic acid (HOA), hydrophobic base (HOB), hydrophobic neutral (HON), hydrophilic acid (HIA), hydrophilic base (HIB), and hydrophilic neutral (HIN), were fractionated according to the procedure suggested by Zhan et al. (2020) . The concentrations of the extracted fractions were measured using a Shimadzu organic carbon analyzer (TOC-5000, Japan).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Characterization of AOM and Membrane Fouling

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Analytical techniques used to characterize AOM and membrane fouling included LC–OCD, FEEM spectrometry, and organic carbon analyzer. Raw water samples were filtered through a 0.45 µm filter in preparation for the analyses. The organic content of the samples was analyzed with a TOC analyzer (TOC-5000; Shimadzu, Japan). The UV-light absorption at 254 nm (UVA254) and UV-Vis spectra were measured using a Shimadzu UV-1601 variable-wavelength spectrophotometer and a quartz cuvette with a 1 cm path length.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Trace and Major Elements Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The acidified water samples were subsequently analysed for trace and major elements using an inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometer (ICP-MS) (2007, Model: PerkinElmer Elan 9000) with an instrument limit of detection of 0.002 ppm for cadmium and 0.009 ppm for lead, whereas the samples for DOC and anions analysis were evaluated using the Shimadzu TOC-5000 without acidification. The leachate samples were digested using the wet acid digestion procedure. Pretreatment of 50 ml of leachate was done with 2 ml nitric acid, and 5 drops of 30% hydrogen peroxide were added in a closed bottle and placed in a constant temperature water bath at 60°C for 1 hour. The clear supernatant was filtered through 0.45 µm filters into plastic sample bottles and analysed for cations, whereas the samples for DOC and anions analysis were only filtered before analysis. The analyses were done over a period of three years, and mean values of the measurements have been reported. The major anions Cl, NO3, and SO42− were analysed at KTH, Stockholm, using a Dionex DX-120 ion chromatograph.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Portable DOC Analyzer for Environmental Monitoring

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To prove the suitability of the prototype as a portable DOC analyzer, it was used during an environmental monitoring program on the water quality in Northern India. Overall, around 100 samples were taken from different sites and rivers in Uttarakhand, see Figure 2, during two sampling campaigns in October 2016 and October 2017. The water samples were taken from rivers and canals as well as from riverbank filtration and groundwater wells. All samples were filtrated (Chromafil® GF/PET-45/25; Macherey-Nagel, Düren, Germany), acidified (pH 1.4, H2SO4, Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) on-site and shortly thereafter measured using the portable prototype. A comparative sample was taken, filtrated, acidified using HCl (pH 1.4, Merck, Darmstadt, Germany), refrigerated, and measured with a TOC-5000 (Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan) as described above.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Soil Biogeochemical Properties Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Soil moisture content was determined by the drying-weighing method. The pH of the organic and mineral soil samples was determined in a 1:2.5 soil/water suspension, and the pH of the litter sample was measured in a 1:10 litter/water suspension with a pH meter (Mettler Delta 340). Soil NH4+ and NO3- were extracted with 2 mol L−1 KCl solution and then determined by a flow injection automatic analyzer (Lachat Instruments, Mequon, WI). Soil dissolved organic C (DOC) and total dissolved N (TDN) were extracted with 0.5 mol L−1 K2SO4 solution, and the concentrations of DOC and TDN in the extracts were determined by a TOC analyzer (TOC-5000, Shimadzu). Soil dissolved organic N (DON) was equal to TDN minus the sum of NH4+ and NO3- . Soil available P was first adsorbed by anion exchange resin membranes and then extracted by 0.5 mol L−1 dilute HCl, and the extracts were analyzed by the malachite green method (Veldhoven and Van Mannaerts, 1987 (link)). Total carbon (TC) and total N (TN) were measured by a C/N elemental analyzer (IsoPrime100, Isoprime).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Quantification of Aquatic Nutrient Levels

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
In situ nutrient concentrations (i.e., NO3 + NO2, NH4, PO4) (water used for seawater medium) were determined using colorimetric methods (UV-1600 Spectrometer, VWR) as described in Valderrama (1995) . Chlorophyll a (Chl a) concentrations in the field were determined fluorometrically upon ethanol extraction according to Jespersen and Christoffersen (1987) as described in Bunse et al. (2019) (link). Samples to determine dissolved organic carbon (DOC) concentrations were taken at the LMO station during the time of sampling for medium. Additionally, samples were taken from each microcosm replicate immediately after the addition of organic compounds (T0). DOC concentrations were determined as follows, 30 mL of sample was filtered through 0.2 μm syringe filters (Acrodisk syringe filters, 32 mm, 514–4131, VWR), filled in MQ washed 60 mL EasY flasks (NuncTM Cell Culture Treated EasYFlasksTM 25 cm2, 156340, Thermo Fisher Scientific) and acidified with 448 μL of 1.2 M hydrochloric acid to a pH of ∼2. Flasks were stored in darkness at 4°C until analysis with a high-temperature carbon analyzer (Shimadzu TOC-5000) at the Umeå Marine Science Centre, Umeå, Sweden. Finally, DOC concentrations (one replicate per replicate enrichment culture bottle) were calculated as non-purgeable organic carbon and mean values per treatment calculated (n = 3).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Sophorolipid Surface Tension Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The determination of the surface tension was performed at room temperature via the Wilhelmy plate method. All glassware and the platinum plate were rinsed with sulfochromic acid prior to the experiment to avoid interference of traces of residual compounds. A dilution series in distilled water ranging from 2.0 g/L to 0.01 mg/L was prepared and the surface tension was determined for each sample. The CMC values were determined as the concentration at which the minimal surface tension was reached when plotting the natural logarithm of the sophorolipid concentration against the surface tension. For sophorolipid lactone 5, the concentration of solubilized sophorolipid was determined with the TOC-5000 (Shimadzu) since this compound is not well soluble in water. With the bruto formula (C34H56O14), the actual sophorolipid concentration could be calculated.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Quantification of Water and Sediment Carbon and Nitrogen

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Non-purgeable total organic carbon (hereafter termed TC) in water samples was determined by measuring organic carbon after acidification with HCl (TOC-5000, Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan). Total nitrogen (TN) in water samples was measured spectrophotometrically (Hitachi U-2000, Hitachi, Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) as nitrate after oxidation at high temperature. Total phosphorus (TP) in water and sediment samples was also measured spectrophotometrically after oxidative hydrolysis of organically bound phosphorus. Total carbon (TC) and total nitrogen (TN) in sediment samples was determined in freeze-dried and ash-free sediments by combustion with oxygen (elemental combustion system, Costech Analytical Technologies, Inc., Valencia, CA, USA).
The Jämtland lakes are generally more oligotrophic with low levels of total organic carbon compared to all Uppland sites (Table 1). However, the environmental variability, measured as coefficient of variation (CV) among sites, was not consistently higher in any data set but differed between environmental variables (Table 1).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!