The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Wright s stain

Manufactured by Merck Group
Sourced in United States, Germany

Wright's stain is a classic laboratory stain used for the differential staining of blood cells. It is a combination of methylene blue and eosin, which stains the nuclei of cells blue and the cytoplasm various shades of pink or red. Wright's stain is commonly used in hematology for the identification and enumeration of different types of blood cells, such as red blood cells, white blood cells, and platelets.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

19 protocols using wright s stain

1

Silencing SNAIL in Rhabdomyosarcoma Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
RH30, RH41 cells and human myoblasts were transfected with 20 nM siRNA against SNAIL (combination of two Silencer Select siRNA ID variants: s13185 and s13187, Ambion Inc., Austin, TX, USA) or scrambled control siRNA (Silencer Select Negative Control #1 siRNA, cat. 4390844, Ambion) using Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen) or Lipofectamine RNAiMAX transfection reagent according to vendor’s instructions. Twenty-four hours later, the transduction medium was changed to differentiating medium supplemented with 2% HS. RNA or protein was isolated 72 h after transfection. The cellular morphology was visualized using Wright’s stain (Sigma-Aldrich). Proliferation of RH30 and RH41 cells transfected on 96-well plates with siRNA was estimated using CellTiter 96® AQueous One Solution assay (Promega, WI, USA), according to vendor’s protocol.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Morphological Evaluation of Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To evaluate their morphology, 8.75 × 103 cells/cm2 were seeded in 35 mm TC dishes (Corning). When 70% confluent, the cells were stained with Wright’s stain (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) and evaluated using a phase contrast microscope (Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Malaria Vaccine Immunization Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Mice were immunized i.p. with a single dose of 20 µg ACT-CSP diluted in 200 µl of phosphate buffered saline (PBS) on day 0. Boost immunization was performed 14 days after prime immunization. Challenge was performed i.v. seven days after prime or boost immunization using 1000 Pb sporozoites. For experiments concerning induction of memory responses the challenge was performed at later time points as indicated. Mice were examined every day and parasitemia was determined every two days by light microscopy of blood smears with Wright’s stain (Sigma, Taufkirchen, Germany).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Cytogenetic Analysis of Tumor Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Fresh tissue from a representative area of the tumors was received and analyzed cytogenetically as part of our diagnostic service. The samples were disaggregated mechanically and enzymatically with collagenase II (Worthington, Freehold, NJ, USA). The resulting cells were cultured and harvested using standard techniques. Chromosome preparations were G-banded with Wright's stain (Sigma-Aldrich; St Louis, MO, USA) and examined. Metaphases were analyzed and karyograms prepared using the CytoVision computer assisted karyotyping system (Leica Biosystems, Newcastle, UK). The karyotypes were described according to the International System for Human Cytogenetics Nomenclature [13 ].
Interphase and metaphase FISH analyses were performed for both cases. The RB1 deletion probe, purchased from Cytocell (http://www.cytocell.co.uk), was used in order to detect deletion of the RB1 locus in 13q14.2. It consists of a 318 kb red probe spanning the RB1 gene and a 13qter green probe acting as a control for chromosome 13. Fluorescent signals were captured and analyzed using the CytoVision system from Leica Biosystems (http://www.leicabiosystems.com/pathology-imaging/cytogenetics/).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Chromosome Analysis by G-banding

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The cell line was subjected to chromosome analysis by G-banding. Cells were trypsinized with trypsin/EDTA after treatment with colchicine (colcemid 10 µg/mL) for 1–3 h, and the slides were prepared according to standard methods. Briefly, cells were incubated in 0.075 M hypotonic KCl solution for 20 min and fixed in glacial acetic acid-methanol (3:1). G-banding was performed using 2 × SSC at 65 °C for 2 min and Wright’s stain for 2 min (all reagents were from Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA). Metaphase images were acquired using an Olympus BX61 microscope (Olympus Corporation, Tokyo, Japan) and analyzed by CytoVision software 7.2 (Leica Biosystems, Newcastle Ltd., UK). A mid-range resolution of 300 bands was achieved. The anomalies were described according to the International System for Human Cytogenetic Nomenclature, 2016 [26 ].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Embryonic Yolk Sac Vascular Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Yolk sacs were fixed in methylcellulose and observed under a stereomicroscope (Nikko ECLIPSE TS100). The survival of embryos was determined by heartbeat or embryo dissolution. The PECAM-1 staining was performed using monoclonal antibody MEC13.3 and detected using an HRP Detection Kit (BD Bioscience). Hemoglobin was stained with o-dianisidine (Sigma-Aldrich). The erythrocytes from the yolk sacs were stained using Wright’s stain (Sigma-Aldrich) and photographed under a microscope (Olympus BX61TRF).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Cytogenetic Analysis of Tumor Cell Cultures

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Fresh tissue from a representative area of the tumors was mechanically and enzymatically disaggregated with collagenase II (Worthington, Freehold, NJ, USA). The cells were cultured and harvested using standard techniques [13 ]. Chromosome preparations were G-banded with Wright’s stain (Sigma-Aldrich, St Louis, MO, USA). Metaphases were analyzed, and karyograms were prepared using the CytoVision computer-assisted karyotyping system (Leica Biosystems, Newcastle, UK). The karyotypes were written according to the International System for Human Cytogenomic Nomenclature [14 ].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Comprehensive Hematological Assessment Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Packed cell volume (PCV) was determined by the standard microhematocrit technique. The blood was mixed thoroughly and drawn into a haematocrit tube of about ¾ lengths. The free end was flame sealed, and subsequently, the haematocrit tubes were centrifuged in a microhematocrit centrifuge (Haematokrit 20; HettichZentrifugen, Tuttlingen, Germany) at 10,000 rpm for 5 min. The PCV was read directly from the microhematocrit reader and recorded. Total erythrocyte counts were obtained by manual counting, using a hemocytometer set (Hawskley B.S.748, London, UK). Leucocyte count was obtained by automatic counting using a Haematology Analyser (CELL-DYN 3700) as described by [15 (link)]. A refractometer was used to determine the plasma protein in the haematocrit tube, and the values were expressed as g/L. Blood smears were stained with Wright’s stain (Sigma®, St. Louis, MO, USA) to record the morphology of erythrocytes and leukocytes. The differential leukocyte count was obtained from the microscopic evaluation of stained blood smears using a light microscope (Lieca® DME, Wetzlar, Germany) under oil immersion (×100). The battlement counting method was consistently used to obtain representative values from the blood smear.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Cytogenetic Analysis of Cell Cultures

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Samples from the operation specimens were mechanically and enzymatically disaggregated and short-term cultured as described by Mandahl (8 ). The cultures were harvested, and the chromosomes were G-banded using Wright's stain (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA). The subsequent cytogenetic analysis and karyotype description followed the recommendations of the International System for Human Cytogenetic Nomenclature (9 ).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Camel Blood Film Preparation and Staining

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Thin blood film slides were prepared for each of the three camel samples in the four solutions at each of the six incubation periods using ~20 μl of solution. Blood films were prepared using a clean spreader slide that was held at a 45° angle toward the drop of blood on the specimen slide. The sample spread along the edge of the slide by capillary action. The spreader slide was then pushed forward rapidly. The slides were then dried and fixed in methanol (for three minutes) to preserve the morphology of cells. Cells were then stained using Wright’s stain (Sigma-Aldrich, USA) for ~12 min then rinsed with distilled water. Cover slips were mounted over the blood films using DPX mountant and placed on a hot plate for two minutes. The blood film slides were examined under a compound light microscope (CH30RF200, Olympus Optical, Japan) at 100X power oil immersion. The blood film slides were imaged using the Leica DM500 Digital Microscope (Leica, Germany) at the Nanoscopy Center of Kuwait University.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!