The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Spss software v 22.0 for windows

Manufactured by IBM
Sourced in United States

SPSS software (v.22.0) for Windows is a statistical analysis tool. It provides data management and analysis capabilities. The software is designed to work with Windows operating systems.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

Lab products found in correlation

10 protocols using spss software v 22.0 for windows

1

Comparing MBI and SMT Effects on Biomarkers

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Two-way mixed ANCOVA test were used to compare the study effects on FC, CRP, and cortisol levels, using time as the within-group factor (baseline versus follow-up at 6 months), and the group as the between-group factor (MBI versus SMT). The analysis was adjusted for pre-intervention (baseline) data. The effect sizes were estimated using the ηp2 and were interpreted following Cohen’s guidelines for small, moderate, and large effect sizes (ηp2 = 0.01, 0.06, or 0.14, respectively)36 (link). The statistical analyses were performed according to the intention-to-treat analysis using SPSS software (v.22.0) for Windows (SPSS Inc., Chicago, Ill, USA). The data are presented as the mean plus or minus the standard deviation (SD), considering the probability of statistical significance (p-values) at threshold values of 0.05 or less for all the comparisons.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Anorexigenic Hormone Responses to Exercise

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All data were analyzed using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) software v22.0 for Windows (SPSS, Chicago, IL). Hormone concentrations (GLP-1 and PYY) were analyzed as absolute change in concentration from baseline using separate 3 × 3 repeated measures ANOVA (session × time). For significant main effects, a Bonferroni adjustment was used for multiple pairwise comparisons. With regard to the anorexigenic hormones, both absolute concentrations and relative changes from baseline resulted in similar statistical output; therefore subsequent presentation of data will focus on the change in hormone concentrations relative to baseline. For differences in perceptions of hunger, a 3 × 3 repeated measures ANOVA (session × time) was performed using the preexercise measure as baseline. This subjective data was also normalized to baseline values and analyzed as a change from baseline. A one-way repeated measures ANOVA was used to compare AUC values for both hormones. Effect sizes were calculated using Cohen's d to determine the magnitude of an effect independent of sample size. Small effect sizes are considered as d < 0.2, moderate effect sizes as d = 0.2–0.8, and large effects sizes as d > 0.8. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. All results are presented as mean ± standard deviation.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Fecal Hemoglobin and Colorectal Neoplasia

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Continuous variables were reported as mean with standard deviation (SD) or median with interquartile range (IQR), whereas qualitative variables were expressed as frequencies and percentages. The relationship between qualitative variables was analyzed by contingency tables with Chi-square test. The Kruskal–Wallis test was performed to evaluate differences in fecal hemoglobin concentrations among groups of individuals with different colonoscopy findings. The Mann–Whitney U test was used to compare differences between two independent groups. The positive predictive value (PPV) at arbitrary fecal hemoglobin concentrations was calculated for advanced colorectal neoplasia. A logistic regression analysis was performed to determine the independent association of sex, age and FIT quartiles with the detection of AN; ORs (CI95%) were reported. For all tests, a two-sided p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. The statistical analysis was performed using the SPSS software v 22.0 for Windows (SPSS Ibérica, Madrid, Spain).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Analyzing Clinically Important Drug Interactions

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics from the SPSS software v.22.0 for Windows (SPSS, Chicago, IL). The median, range, and percentage were applied to present the results where appropriate. The interacting drug classes, significance, reliability, and clinical management of the interactions were recorded in a database. Interactions with a severity rating of D and/or X and a reliability rating of E and/or G were considered clinically important pDDIs for more analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Prognostic Biomarkers in Gastric Cancer

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The collected data were processed using GraphPad Prism 9.2.0.332. Statistically
significant differences among patients with AFP-negative GC, gastric patients
with preoperative elevated serum AFP, and healthy people were determined using
an unpaired t‑test. Correlation analysis was performed for the
analysis and the relationships between peripheral biomarkers and D-dimer.
Associations of D-dimer levels with clinicopathological characteristics were
presented as counts and percentages, and were analyzed using a chi-square test.
Survival curves were calculated using the Kaplan–Meier method. Univariate
survival analyses and variables with statistical significance were entered into
the Cox proportional hazards regression model analysis. Finally, Cox
proportional hazards regression model analysis was used to identify the factors
associated with OS. A P value of less than .05 was considered
to be statistically significant. SPSS software (V.22.0) for Windows was used for
all statistical analyses.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Statistical Analysis of Outcome Prediction

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS software for Windows (v.22.0; SPSS, Chicago, IL, United States). The statistical methods of this study were reviewed by I.L. Rusu, biomedical statistician. Nominal variables are presented as frequencies and percentages, and continuous variables as the mean ± SD. We were able to apply all tests as the score values are homogenous, median value is similar to the mean value and skeweness test had [-2÷ 2] interval. Categorical variables were presented as percentages and compared using Chi-square test. A P value of < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. We determined the scores’ ability to predict each investigated outcome by calculating the area under the receiver operating characteristics curves (AUROCs), including optimal cut-off value with specificity and sensitivity and 95% confidence intervals. AUROCs were determined significant for a value above 0.600. Subsequently, we analyzed through a logistic binary regression model, if addition of lactate to the risk scores increased the probability of previously determined outcomes.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Statistical Analysis of CO Poisoning

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Statistical analyses were performed with SPSS software for Windows (v.22.0; SPSS, Chicago, IL, USA). Nominal variables are presented as frequencies and percentages, and continuous variables are presented as the mean ± standard deviation (SD). To identify significant parameters associated with a CO poisoning diagnosis, a two-tailed Student’s t-test was used to compare normally distributed continuous variables, whereas the chi-squared test and Cochrane’s statistic were used for categorical variables. A p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Recurrence Risk Assessment in Surgery

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS software for Windows v 22.0 (SPSS, Chicago, Illinois, USA). The independent t test, χ2 test, and Fisher’s exact test were used to compare the patient’s characteristics and the surgical outcomes. Kaplan-Meier life-table analysis was used to compare the long-term cumulative probability of recurrence between the RR group and RR-FDT group. P < .05 was considered statistically significant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Evaluating SYNTAX Score Prediction

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
SPSS v.22.0 software for Windows (SPSS Inc. Chicago, llinois, USA) was used for the statistical analysis. Continuous variables were expressed as mean± standard deviation (SD), while categorical variables were expressed in numbers and percentages. The normal distribution of the data was evaluated by Kolmogorov-Smirnov and Shapiro-Wilk test. Nonparametric variables between groups were compared with the Mann-Whitney U test or Student’s test. The patient group population was further divided into tertiles on the basis of SYNTAX scores calculated. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) test was used for continuous variables, whereas categorical variables were compared with the chi-square test among SYNTAX score tertiles. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to detect the sensitivity and specificity of WMR and its cutoff values in the prediction of SYNTAX score. P value <0.05 was accepted to be statistically significant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Descriptive Statistical Analysis of Study Data

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The data of the individuals participating in the study were recorded in the previously prepared study forms. Then, in order to perform the analyzes to be used in the study, the data were collected with SPSS v. 22.0 software for Windows (SPSS Inc. Chicago, Illinois, USA) saved in the database. Descriptive statistical methods (mean, standard deviation, median, frequency, percentage, minimum, maximum) were used to evaluate the study data. The conformity of the data to the normal distribution was evaluated with the Kolmogorov-Smirnov and Shapiro-Wilk test. Kruskal-Wallis analysis of variance and Mann-Whitney U test were used for data that did not fi t the nominal distribution. Data were presented as numbers, percentages, and arithmetic mean±standard deviation. The Pearson chi-square test, Fisher's exact test and the Fisher-Freeman-Halton exact test were used for comparison of the qualitative data. Signifi cance level was accepted as p < 005.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!