The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Ultra plus field emission scanning electron microscope

Manufactured by Zeiss
Sourced in Germany

The Ultra Plus Field Emission Scanning Electron Microscope is a high-performance imaging and analytical tool designed for advanced materials characterization. It utilizes a field emission electron source to provide high-resolution, high-contrast images of a wide range of samples, from nanomaterials to biological specimens. The microscope is equipped with advanced detectors and analytical capabilities, enabling comprehensive investigation of the structural, chemical, and morphological properties of the sample under examination.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

27 protocols using ultra plus field emission scanning electron microscope

1

Confocal and Electron Microscopy Imaging

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Confocal images were obtained using a Leica TCS SP8 confocal laser microscope with 20x and 40x magnification for adult and embryonic heart valves, respectively. 3D projections and oblique slices of confocal images were generated using Imaris (Bitplane). Electron microscopy (SEM) images were obtained using a Zeiss Ultra plus field emission scanning electron microscope. Images were processed using Adobe Illustrator CC2015 (Adobe Systems).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Polymer Film Preparation and Characterization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For sample
preparation, the following protocol was adapted. A suitably sized
silicon wafer was cleaned using acetone (HPLC grade) and then rinsed
with water (double distilled). The polymer solution (concentration
10–5 M in toluene) was dropcasted on the precleaned
silicon wafer. The films thus obtained because of solvent evaporation
were allowed to dry at room temperature for 1 h to remove any residual
solvent. FE-SEM images of the dropcasted films (of TBAFPs) were captured using a Carl Zeiss ultra plus field emission scanning
electron microscope. For high resolution imaging, a very thin layer
of gold was deposited on the surface of the polymer sample using a
Quorum Q150RS vacuum sputter to increase the electrical conductivity.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Scanning Electron Microscopy of DRibbles

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The DRibbles were collected, and the sample for SEM was added to 4% paraformaldehyde to fix at 4°C overnight. Thereafter, the sample was dripped on a small piece of aluminum foil, which was used as the counter electrode, and dried in air. The surface morphology of the sample was observed with an Ultra Plus Field Emission scanning electron microscope (Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany) operating at 1.00 kV. The image was acquired with a CCD camera (Evolution MP 5.0; Media Cybernetics, Rockville, MD, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Scanning Electron Microscopy of Bacterial Biofilms

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A Zeiss Ultra Plus Field Emission Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM) was used to observe the morphological characteristics of the bacteria on carbon paper anodes pre-treated as follows. First, small pieces of the carbon paper from anodes were fixed in 2.5% glutaraldehyde solution for 2 hours, washed three times with 0.2 mM PBS buffer, and sequentially washed with deionized water three times. Next, they were dehydrated successively for 5 minutes in 50%, 70%, and 90% t-butanol mixed with ethanol. The samples were then dehydrated continuously 3 times with 100% t-butanol for 5 minutes before drying overnight.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Microscopic Imaging of Grass Leaf Structure

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Transverse sections of all grass leaves were imaged for light microscopy under 10× and 40× objectives using a Nikon Eclipse 50i upright microscope (Nikon Instruments). SEM was performed using a Zeiss Ultra Plus field emission scanning electron microscope at 3 kV. To quantify pit field distribution, two z-stacks from two leaf tissues per species were obtained using a Leica SP8 multiphoton confocal microscope (Leica Microsystems). Details can be found in Danila et al. (2016) (link).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Scanning Electron Microscopy of Leech Specimens

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For scanning electron microscopy, leech specimens were treated with 16% paraformaldehyde (Electron Microscopy Sciences, Hatfield, PA, USA) or relaxation solution (4.8 mM NaCl2, 1.2 mM KCl, 10 mM MgCl2, 8% EtOH) while feeding or relaxing. After treatment, the head region containing the proboscis was cut and fixed in 4% PFA at room temperature overnight. The tissues were washed three times with PBT (1X PBS + 0.1% Tween-20) for 20 min at room temperature, and then fixed in 1% osmium tetroxide (Ted Pella Inc., Redding, CA, USA) in 1 M PBS for 1 h. Osmium tetroxide was removed by washing three times with PBT. Thereafter, the tissues were gradually dehydrated with ethanol (30%, 50%, 60%, 70%, 80%, 90%, 95%, 100% in 1X PBS) for 20 min per step. Dehydrated tissues were treated with stepwise concentrated isopentyl acetate (Alfa Aesar, Ward Hill, MA, USA) (isopentyl acetate: EtOH = 1:3, 1:1, and 3:1) for 15 min per step, and then transferred to 100% isopentyl acetate. After the solution was removed, the samples were dried for 3 days in a fume hood. Dried samples were coated with gold particles and examined with an UltraPlus field emission scanning electron microscope (Carl Zeiss, Oberkochen, BW, Germany).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

FESEM Imaging of Lung Fibroblasts

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Primary cultures of lung fibroblasts from Sec13+/+ and Sec13H/− mice were prepared for FESEM imaging as previously described47 (link)48 (link). Briefly, cells were detached by trypsinization, washed in PBS, and subjected to two separate rounds of hypotonic treatment (15 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.4, 10 mM NaCl, 3 mM MgCl2). The cells were then resuspended in PBS+10% glycerol, spun down onto poly-lysine-coated silicon chips and fixed in 3% glutaraldehyde in PBS. Further processing for FESEM included postfixation in 1% osmium tetroxide, dehydration through a graded ethanol series and critical-point drying on a CPD030 apparatus (Bal-Tec). Samples were sputter-coated with 1–2 nm chromium on an EMITECH K575X apparatus and imaged with an in-lens detector for secondary electrons on a Zeiss ULTRA plus field emission scanning electron microscope.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Mineralogical Mapping of Mg-bearing Coralline Algae

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Mineralogical composition mapping of a single long-term P. onkodes skeleton was also carried out at ANU (Centre for Advanced Microscopy, Dr Frank Brink) using QEMSCAN. This mapping integrates scanning electron microscopy and energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (SEM-EDS) hardware with software to generate micron-scale compositional maps of rocks and sediments and is widely used in mining and petroleum industries [58 ]. To apply this method of mineral analyses to the MgCO3 coralline algae skeleton, the technique was modified to determine changes in the Mg intensity (i.e., high Mg-calcite, dolomite and magnesite), rather than changes between minerals. Images of these changes in Mg intensity were taken at a resolution of 5 μm. SEM-EDS, using a Zeiss Ultraplus field emission scanning electron microscope, operated at 15.0 kV, 10.9 mm working distance was then used to provide elemental composition using spot analysis within each of these bands. Samples were carbon coated and mounted using carbon tape. As outlined in Nash et al., [8 , 48 ], Mg-calcite was identified ranging from 8–25 mol% MgCO3, dolomite as 38–62%, and magnesite as >80% (however measurements between 62–99% are thought to be magnesite with small amounts of the neighbouring Mg-calcite or dolomite).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Rab21CA Trophozoites Adhesion Assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Rab21CA transfomants were plated on different ECM coated surfaces and incubated for 4–6 hrs at 35°C and processed for SEM analysis.
Briefly, log phase trophozoites were harvested and washed with complete medium and then resuspended in warm complete medium containing 15% adult bovine serum. The trophozoites were plated on glass coverslips in a four well plate placed in a BD EZ Gas Pak and incubated at 37°C for an hour for attachment. Further the medium in the wells was replaced with medium containing 2 mg/ml of collagen type I and 1mg/ml of matrigel and trophozoites were incubated for additional 6–8hrs at 37°C in the GasPak. Thereafter, the medium was removed and the cells were briefly washed with warm 0.1M phosphate buffer (pH 7.4) and fixed using 2.5% EM grade gultaraldehyde in 0.1M phosphate buffer (pH 7.4) at 4°C for overnight. Following day, the cells were dehydrated in a graded series of alcohol (25%, 50%, 75%, 95%) for 15min each at RT followed by 100% for 15 min at RT for three times. The samples were then left for drying at RT for 48–56hrs covered with an aluminum foil. The dried samples were sputter coated with gold using Quorum Q150R ES and were examined and photographed with Zeiss ULTRA PLUS field emission scanning electron microscope operating at 5kV.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Scanning Electron Microscopy of Macrophages and Bacteria

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Bone marrow‐derived macrophages or mid‐logarithmic phase cultures of M. catarrhalis incubated either in the presence or absence of recombinant mGBP2 were washed in PBS, fixed with 2.5% glutaraldehyde in PBS for 3 h and further washed with PBS. Cells were fixed in 1% osmium tetroxide in distilled water for 1 h. Samples were subsequently dehydrated in a series of alcohol and subjected to liquid carbon dioxide critical point drying. Samples were then sputter‐coated with platinum (3 nm thickness) at 15 mA for 2 min using the EMI TECH K550 Sputter coater and visualised under a Zeiss UltraPlus Field emission scanning electron microscope at 2–5 kV.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!