The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

2 protocols using anti mil 4

1

Induction of T-cell Subsets from Naive Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Splenocytes from C57BL/6 background Rag1−/− mice were irradiated with 2,500 Rads (X-rad irradiator) and 3 × 105 cells were seeded into each well of a 96 well plate. Naϊve T cells (CD90.2+, CD4+, CD62L+, CD44+, CD25) were sorted from C57BL/6 background WT or Rag1−/− mice using a FACSaria Fusion cell sorter (BD Biosciences), and 3 × 104 sorted cells were added to each well containing irradiated feeder cells. All cells were cultured with 10 μg/ml anti-CD3 (Biolegend) and 3 μg/ml anti-CD28 (Biolegend) in RPMI with 10% FBS, 1% PSG, and 1x NEAA (Invitrogen), 1x Sodium Pyruvate (Invitrogen), and 0.001% 2-mercaptoethanol. rhIL-2 was used at 30 IU/mL, rmIL-12 and rmIL-4 at 10 ng/mL, rmIL-6 at 20 ng/mL, mTGFβ1 at 1 ng/mL, anti-mIL-4, anti-mIFNγ and anti-mIL-12 at 10 μg/mL (from Biolegend except rhIL-2, rmIL-12, and rmIL-6 from Prepotech). The following cytokines/blocking antibodies were used to skew towards respective Th-subsets: Th0 condition: rhIL-2; Th1 condition: rhIL-2, rmIL-12 and anti-mIL-4; Th2 condition: rhIL-2, rmIL-4, anti-mIFNγ and anti-mIL-12; Th17 condition: rhIL-2, mIL-6, mTGFβ1, anti-mIL-4 and anti-mIL-12; Treg condition: rhIL-2, mTGFβ1, anti-mIL-4 and anti-mIL-12.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Isolation and Characterization of Immune Cell Subsets

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Spleens were isolated and manipulated through a 40-µm filter, and erythrocytes were lysed with ACK lysis buffer. Different cell subsets were sorted by a fluorescence activated cell sorter (FACS) (Sony S800) according to the following cell markers: naïve CD4 (CD4+CD25CD62L+CD44); memory CD4 (CD4+CD25CD62LCD44+); Treg (CD4+CD25hi); aTreg (CD4+CD25hiCD44+CD62L); rTreg (CD4+CD25hiCD44CD62L+); naïve CD8 (CD8+CD44CD62L); memory CD8 (CD8+CD44+); NK (Nkp46+); B cell (B220+); and macrophage (F4/80+CD11b+). Pan T cells were separated by negative selection using a Pan T Cell Isolation kit (Miltenyi Biotec, Germany). CD4+ and CD8+ T cells were isolated using anti-mouse CD4 and CD8 magnetic particles and separated by MACS.
For in vitro studies, cells were plated at a density of 5 × 105 cells/well in 96-well plates precoated with anti-CD3 (Clone 500A2; BD Pharmingen) and anti-CD28 (clone 37.51; BD Pharmingen) (0.5 μg/ml) or stimulated with a cell stimulation cocktail (eBioscience). To polarize T cells toward a Th1 phenotype, 1 ng/ml mIL-12 (R&D) and 10 μg/ml anti–mIL-4 (BioLegend) were added to culture medium at the time of plating. For Th17 cells, 5 ng/ml mTGF-β, 20 ng/ml mIl-6, 2 ng/ml mIL-23 (Peprotech), 10 μg/ml anti-IFN-γ, and 10 μg/ml anti-IL-4 were added. For Treg induction, 5 ng/ml TGF-β, 100 IU rhIL-2, and 10 μg/ml anti-IFN-γ were added.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!