The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

11 protocols using ertapenem

1

Antibiotic Susceptibility of Bacterial Isolates

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The susceptibility to the commercial antibiotics of the bacterial isolates was evaluated using the disc diffusion method. Antibiotics used against Gram-positive bacteria included cefoxitin, benzyl-penicillin, oxacillin, imipenem, gentamicin, ciprofloxacin, moxifloxacin, inducible clindamycin resistance, erythromycin, clindamycin, vancomycin, tetracycline, fusidic acid, and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole. On the other hand, antibiotics used against Gram-negative bacteria included temocillin, ampicillin, amoxicillin/clavulanic acid, ticarcillin, ticarcillin/clavulanic acid, piperacillin, piperacillin/tazobactam, cephalothin, cefuroxime, cefotaxime, ceftazidime, ceftriaxone, cefepime, ertapenem, imipenem, meropenem, amikacin, gentamicin, tobramycin, ciprofloxacin, tigecycline, fosfomycin, nitrofurantoin, pefloxacin, minocycline, colistin, and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (Himedia Labs, Mumbai, India) [19 ].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing of Escherichia coli

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
This was performed with the disk diffusion method (Kirby-Bauer’s) and the inhibition zone diameters were measured by (mm) according to Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI).12 (link) The antimicrobial discs tested include Amoxicillin/clavulanic acid (30 μg), ampicillin (10 μg), cefotaxime (30 μg), ceftazidime (30 μg), ceftriaxone (30 μg), aztreonam (30 μg), imipenem (10 μg), meropenem (10 μg), ertapenem (10 μg), gentamicin (10 μg), tobramycin (10 μg), amikacin (30 μg), tetracycline (30 μg), ciprofloxacin (5 μg), norfloxacin (10 μg), nalidixic acid (30 μg), co-trimoxazole (25 μg) and colistin (10 μg) were obtained from HiMedia Laboratories (India). The results for the antimicrobial susceptibility test strain were interpreted as (S) susceptible, (I) intermediate or (R) resistant by comparing the results to the CLSI 2018 standard zone diameter.12 (link) Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) for imipenem and meropenem were performed by the agar dilution method and interpreted according to CLSI guidelines (strains displaying MICs ≥8 µg/mL for imipenem and meropenem were considered resistant).12 (link)
Escherichia coli ATCC 25922 was used as standard control strains.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Antimicrobial susceptibility was determined by Kirby Bauer disc diffusion method on Mueller–Hinton Agar plates. Following antibiotics were used: amikacin (30 μg), gentamicin (10 μg), ciprofloxacin (30 μg), trimethoprim/sulphamethoxazole (1.25/23.75 μg), tigecycline (15 μg) (Hi Media, Mumbai). MIC’s of various antibiotics were also determined on Mueller–Hinton Agar plates by agar dilution method according to CLSI and EUCAST guidelines [16 , 17 ]. Following antibiotics were used: cefotaxime, ceftazidime, ceftriaxone, cefepime, imipenem, meropenem, ertapenem and aztreonam (Hi-Media, Mumbai, India).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Antimicrobial Susceptibility of Bacterial Isolates

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The antimicrobial susceptibility of the two investigated isolates were tested according to the Clinical Laboratory Standard Institute guidelines, CLSI (M100-S32, 2022) recommendations using Escherichiacoli ATCC 25922 as quality control strain [14 ]. The investigated isolates were tested against the following antimicrobial agents, viz., ampicillin (30 µg), cefepime (30 µg), ceftriaxone (30 µg), cefotaxime (30 µg), ceftazidime (30 µg), aztreonam (30 µg), ertapenem (10 µg), imipenem (10 µg), meropenem (10 µg), amikacin (10 µg), gentamicin (10 µg) and ciprofloxacin (5 µg) (HiMedia, India) via Kirby-Bauer disc diffusion method. The minimal inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of ertapenem (MSD, France), imipenem (Merck, France) and meropenem (AstraZeneca, UK) were determined through agar dilution method (concentration range : 1–64 µg/ml).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Antibiotic Susceptibility Testing Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The antimicrobial susceptibility test was performed by the Kirby-Bauer disc diffusion technique on Mueller-Hinton agar, as per Clinical Laboratory Standard Institute (CLSI) guidelines.[9 ] The antibiotics tested were as follows (potency in μg/disc): Ampicillin (10), cefuroxime (30), cefpodoxime (CPD) (30), ceftazidime (30), cefepime (30), cefotaxime (30), piperacillin (100), ticarcillin (75), piperacillin-tazobactam (100/10), ticarcillin-clavulanic acid (75/10), aztreonam (30), imipenem (IP) (10), meropenem (10), ertapenem (10), colistin (10), gentamicin (10), tobramycin (10), amikacin (30), netilmicin (30), ciprofloxacin (5), levofloxacin (5), lomefloxacin (10), and ofloxacin (5) (Hi-Media Laboratories Pvt., Ltd., Mumbai, India). Pseudomonas aeruginosa ATCC 27853, Escherichia coli ATCC 25922, E. coli ATCC 35218 and Klebsiella pneumoniae ATCC 700603 were used as quality control strains.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Antibiotics discs containing amikacin (30 μg), amoxicillin-clavulanic acid (30 μg), aztreonam (30 μg), ampicillin (10 μg), azithromycin (30 μg), cefepime (30 μg), Cefoperazone/Sulbactam (75/30 μg), ceftriaxone (30 μg), cefotaxime (30 μg), cefuroxime (30 μg), cephalexin (30 μg), ciprofloxacin (1 μg), clindamycin (2 μg), cloxacillin (30 μg), trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (25 μg), ertapenem (10 μg), erythromycin (15 μg), gatifloxacin (5 μg), gentamicin (10 μg), imipenem (10 μg), levofloxacin (5 μg), linezolid (30 μg), meropenem (10 μg), netilmicin (30 μg), norfloxacin (10 μg), ofloxacin (5 μg), piperacillin-tazobactam (100/10 μg), teicoplanin (30 μg), tetracycline (30 μg), and vancomycin (30 μg) were obtained from Himedia Laboratories (Mumbai, India) and used as per manufacturer's instructions.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Antibiotic Susceptibility of NDM-Harboring Enterobacterales

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The selected blaNDM harbouring Enterobacterales isolates were further tested by Kirby Bauer disc diffusion tests with CAZ (30μg), AZT (30μg), CAZ-AVI (30 μg /20 μg), imipenem (10μg), ertapenem (10μg) and meropenem (10μg) discs (HiMedia Laboratories, India). The results were interpreted as per zone diameter breakpoints described in the performance standards of antimicrobial susceptibility testing by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) in 2022 [12 ].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Antibiotic Susceptibility Testing Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Antimicrobial susceptibility was determined by Kirby–Bauer disc diffusion method13 (link) on MHA plates. The following antibiotics were used: amikacin (30 μg), gentamicin (10 μg), ciprofloxacin (30 μg), trimethoprim/sulphamethoxazole (1.25/23.75 μg), cefepime (30 μg), imipenem (10 μg), meropenem (10 μg), ceftriaxone (30 μg) and aztreonam (30 μg) (HiMedia). Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of various antibiotics were determined on MHA plates by agar dilution method according to CLSI guidelines14 using the following antibiotics: cefotaxime, ceftazidime, ceftriaxone, cefepime, imipenem, meropenem, ertapenem and aztreonam (HiMedia).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Rapid Detection of Multidrug-Resistant Gram-Negative Bacteria in Stool Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To identify VRE, stool samples were inoculated onto VRE agar (HiCrome VRE Agar, HiMedia Laboratories). To identify Gram-negative bacilli, stool samples were inoculated onto eosin methylene blue agar. All isolates were identified by MALDI-TOF MS (Bruker MALDI Biotyper, Germany). Antibiotic susceptibility was assessed using the disk diffusion method using the following antibiotics: 30 µg cefepime, 5 µg cefotaxime, 10 µg ceftazidime, 30 µg ceftriaxone, 5 µg ciprofloxacin, 10 µg ertapenem, 10 µg gentamicin, 10 µg imipenem, 10 µg meropenem and 36 µg piperacillin–tazobactam (HiMedia Laboratories, India). Suspected isolates were tested for the production of ESBLs with the combination disk test.7 Isolates resistant to cefoxitin, and cefotaxime or ceftazidime were tested for the production of AmpC β-lactamases (AmpC) using a disk test (Mast Discs Combi, UK). All disc diffusion tests were evaluated according to the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST).7 Multi-drug resistance (MDR) is defined as combined resistance to third-generation cephalosporins [cefotaxime or ceftazidime or ceftriaxone, fluoroquinolones (ciprofloxacin) and aminoglycosides (gentamycin)]. No VRE was identified.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Antimicrobial Susceptibility of CTX-M Strains

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Antimicrobial susceptibility of blaCTX-M harbouring parent strains as well as transformants were determined by Kirby Bauer disc diffusion method and results were interpreted as per CLSI guidelines [17 ]. Following antibiotics were tested: cefotaxime (30μg), cefoxitin (30μg), ceftazidime (30μg), amikacin (30μg), gentamicin (10μg), kanamicin (30μg), ciprofloxacin (5μg), trimithoprim/sulphamethoxazole (1.25/23.75μg), imipenem (10μg), ertapenem (10μg), tigecycline (15μg) and polymyxin B (300 units) (Hi-Media, Mumbai). MIC was also determined for donor strain and transformants against cefotaxime, ceftazidime and ceftriaxone (Hi-Media, Mumbai, India) by agar dilution method.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!