The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

18 protocols using restriction endonuclease

1

DNA Manipulation Techniques in E. coli

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Methods as described previously [19 ] were used for preparation of plasmid and chromosomal DNAs, restriction digestion, DNA ligation, agarose-gel electrophoresis and DNA transformation of E. coli. Conjugation between Xcc and E. coli strains was performed as described previously [20 (link)]. Restriction endonucleases, T4 DNA ligase and Pfu polymerase were purchased from Promega.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Nucleic Acid Manipulation and Bacterial Conjugation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The nucleic acid manipulations followed the procedures described by Sambrook et al. (1989). Conjugation between the Xcc and E. coli strains was performed as described by Turner et al. (1985). The restriction endonucleases, T4 DNA ligase and Pfu polymerase were provided by Promega (Shanghai, China). The total RNAs were extracted from the cultures of the Xcc strains with a total‐RNA extraction kit (Invitrogen, Waltham, MA, USA) and cDNA generated using a cDNA synthesis kit (Invitrogen). These kits were used with reference to the manufacturer's instructions. For semi‐quantitative RT‐PCR, the obtained cDNA was diluted and used as a template with selected primers for target genes (Table S3).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Recombinant Murine and Human IL-12 Production

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Recombinant murine and human IL-12s (rmIL-12 and rhIL-12), rhIL-12 p40, and goat polyclonal anti-rmIL-12 and anti-rhIL-12 were purchased from R&D Systems Europe Ltd. (Abingdon, Oxon, UK). Alkaline phosphatase- and horseradish peroxidase-coupled anti-goat Ig, endoproteinase LysC (EC 3.4.21.50) and p-nitrophenyl phosphate tablets were all obtained from the Sigma Chemical Co., St. Louis, MO, USA. A series of chemically modified heparins, were prepared and structurally characterised as fully described elsewhere [34] . PCR primers were obtained from MWG Biotech (Edersberg, Germany). Murine IL-12 p35 and p40 cDNA clones in pBluescript were obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC, Manassas, VA, USA). Restriction endonucleases were purchased from Promega Corporation (Madison, WI, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Enzymatic Biosynthesis of Nucleotide Sugars

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
DNaseI, Glucose-1-phosphate, dTTP, dTDP-D-glucose, malachite green reagent, NADPH, phenylmethanesulfonyl fluoride (PMSF), pyrophosphatase, UTP and UDP-glucose were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis MO), dTDP-4-keto-6-deoxy-glucose came from Carbosynth (Berkshire, UK), novobiocin and ampicillin were obtained from Duchefa Biochemie (Haarlem, The Netherlands), while restriction endonucleases were purchased from Promega (Madison, WI).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Soybean Flour Extract Preparation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Soybean flour extract was prepared following the method of previous report with some modifications [14] . The soybean flour was defatted in three volumes of n-hexane for 30 min with agitation at room temperature, centrifuged at 13,000 g for 20 min, and air-dried to a fine powder.
The substrates cellobiose, carboxymethyl cellulose sodium (CMC-Na), Avicel, laminiarin, lichenin, amygdalin, daidzin, genistin, glycitin, daidzein, genistein, glycitein, birchwood xylan, beechwood xylan, sophorose, gentiobiose, salicin, lactose, p-nitrophenyl β-d-glucopyranoside (pNPG) and other p-nitrophenyl glycosides, and Novozyme 188 (cellobiase from Aspergillus niger) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO). Other substrates including barley β-glucan and xyloglucan were obtained from Megazyme (Wicklow, Ireland). T4 DNA ligase and restriction endonucleases were purchased from Promega (Madison, WI).
The Fungal DNA Isolation Kit and RNeasy Plant Mini Kit were obtained from Omega Bio-tek (Norcross, GA) and QIAGEN (Hilden, Germany), respectively. The DNA Purification Kit, LA Taq DNA polymerase and restriction endonucleases were purchased from TaKaRa (Otsu, Japan). All other chemicals were of analytical grade and commercially available.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Optimized Myeloma Cell Culture Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
RPMI 1640 medium, Opti-MEM® I Reduced-Serum Medium and fetal bovine serum, Lipofectamine™ 2000 Transfection Reagent, TRIzol RNA isolation reagent and primers were from Invitrogen (Grand Island, NY). Cell Counting Kit-8 (CCK-8), melphalan, myrecitin, synthetic siRNA against APE1 and MDR1 were from Sigma-Aldrich (St Louis, MO). Tetrahydrofuran-containing oligonucleotides, biotin-conjugated oligos and all other regular oligos were synthesized from Takara (Dalian, China). T4 polynucleotide kinase (T4 PNK), T4 ligase, restriction endonucleases, and high-fidelity Pfu DNA polymerase were from Promega (Madison, WI). Halt protease inhibitor cocktail, LightShift chemiluminescent EMSA kit, Super Signal West Pico chemiluminescent reagents, horseradish peroxidase-conjugated anti-mouse or anti-rabbit IgG antibodies were from Pierce (Rockford, IL). The chemo-sensitive RPMI-8226 and U266 cell line were purchased from American Type Culture Collection (Manassas, VA) and their melphalan-resistant sublines RPMI-8226/LR5 and U266/LR6 were obtained from Dr. William S. Dalton (Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL). All MM cell lines were grown in RPMI 1640 medium supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum, 100 U/ml penicillin and 100 μg/ml streptomycin (Hyclone, Logan, UT), and maintained at 37°C in a humidified atmosphere in the presence of 5% CO2-95% air.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

DNA Manipulation and Protein Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
DNA manipulations followed the procedures described by Sambrook and associates50 . Plasmids were transformed into cells of E. coli and Xanthomonas spp. by electroporation or conjugation described by Turner and associates51 . The restriction endonucleases, T4 DNA ligase, and pfu polymerase were provided by Promega (Shanghai, China). The total RNAs from Xanthomonas spp. were extracted with a total-RNA extraction kit (Promega), and reverse transcription was performed using a cDNA synthesis kit (Fermentas Co., Vilnius, Lithuania). Each kit was used according to the manufacturer’s instructions.
Western blotting was carried out as previously described21 (link). Briefly, bacterial proteins were separated by 12% (w/v) SDS-PAGE and transferred onto PVDF (polyvinylidene difluoride) membrane (Millipore Corporation, Billerica, MA, USA). After blocking, the 1:2500 diluted anti-His-tag mouse monoclonal antibody (Qiagen, Shanghai, China) was used as the primary antibody, and the 1:2500 diluted horseradish peroxidase conjugated goat antimouse IgG (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA) was used as secondary antibody.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Transcriptional Analysis of gumB in Xanthomonas

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The DNA manipulations followed the procedures described by Sambrook et al.42 . Conjugation between the Xcc and E. coli strains was performed as described by Turner et al.43 . The restriction endonucleases, T4 DNA ligase and pfu polymerase were provided by Promega (Shanghai, China). The total RNAs were extracted from the cultures of the Xcc strains using a total-RNA extraction kit (Promega) according to the manufacturer’s instructions.
To assay the transcription level of gumB, real-time quantitative PCR (qRT-PCR) was carried out as previously described44 . qRT-PCR was conducted with the total RNA extracted from the Xcc strains grown in NY medium containing 2% glucose for 12 and 48 h. The synergy brand (SYBR) green-labelled PCR fragments were amplified using the primer set gumNF/R (Supplementary Table 1), which was designed from the transcribed region of gumB. The relative mRNA level was calculated with respect to the level of the corresponding transcript in the wild-type strain 8004 (equalling 1). The expression level of the 16S rRNA gene was used as an internal standard. The qRT-PCR tests were performed in triplicate.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Cloning and Expression of Hepatitis C Proteins

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Amplified DNA fragments encoding the core (aa110-160 or aa1-50), E1 (aa190-222), E2 (aa408-560), and NS3 (aa1230-1433 or aa1230-1341) proteins were cloned into pGEM-T Easy Vector. Afterwards, the fragments were consecutively inserted in plasmid pIME64k after digestion of the corresponding T vector with restriction endonucleases (Promega, USA), resulting in the final constructs pPNSEst2E1P1 and pPEstNSE1P1 for expressing the proteins NS3EnvCo and EnvCNS3, respectively.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Genetic Manipulation and Transcriptomic Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The DNA manipulations followed the procedures described by Sambrook et al. (1989). Conjugation between the Xcc and E. coli strains was performed as described by Turner et al. (1985). The restriction endonucleases, T4 DNA ligase and pfu polymerase were provided by Promega (Shanghai, China). The total RNAs were extracted from the cultures of the Xcc strains with a total‐RNA extraction kit (Invitrogen, Waltham, MA, USA) and cDNA generated using a cDNA synthesis kit (Invitrogen). For Semi‐quantitative reverse‐transcription PCR (RT‐PCR), the obtained cDNA was diluted and used as a template with selected primers (see Supporting Information Table S5) for target genes.
To assay the transcription level of certain genes (e.g. gumB, xcsC, pelB, egl), quantitative real‐time PCR (qRT‐PCR) was carried out as previously described (Li et al., 2014). The synergy brand (SYBR) green‐labelled PCR fragments were amplified using the corresponding primer set (Supporting Information Table S5). The relative mRNA level was calculated with respect to the level of the corresponding transcript in the wild‐type strain 8004 (equalling 1). The expression level of the 16S rRNA gene was used as an internal standard. The qRT‐PCR tests were performed in triplicate.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!