The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Cellulose nitrate membrane filter

Manufactured by GE Healthcare
Sourced in United Kingdom

Cellulose nitrate membrane filters are a type of laboratory equipment used for filtration. They are designed to separate particles and contaminants from liquid samples. The filters are made of cellulose nitrate, a semi-synthetic polymer material, and are available in various pore sizes to accommodate different filtration requirements.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

5 protocols using cellulose nitrate membrane filter

1

Isotopic Analysis of Precipitation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
In this study, event-based precipitation samples were collected from June 2014 to May 2016. In total we collected 235 precipitation samples consisting of 201 rainfall events and 34 snowfall events. To reduce evaporation effects on isotopes, samples were transferred from the precipitation collector to sealed glass vials (Qorpak Bottles, Fisher Scientific Co. Germany) immediately after each event. The samples were then stored at 4 °C until isotope analysis. If the precipitation event was finished after midnight, sampling was conducted at the earliest possible time in the morning. Snowfall samples were melted in sealed plastic bags, poured into the vials and then stored. Prior to measurements, samples containing impurities were filtered with 0.45 μm syringe filters (Cellulose Nitrate Membrane Filters, GE Healthcare Co. UK) or centrifuged (Iec Centra CL2 Centrifuge, Thermo Electron Co. USA) depending on the size of the impurities.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Graphene Oxide-Conductive Polymer Composite

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Graphene oxide (GO) was purchased from Graphenea. Pyrrole monomer (Py; 97%) was obtained from Merck and distilled prior to use. Nickel nitrate hexahydrate (Ni(NO3)2·6H2O; 98%) and cobalt nitrate hexahydrate (Co(NO3)2·6H2O; 98%) were supplied by Sigma Aldrich. The reducing agent, hydrazine monohydrate (N2H4·H2O, 100%) was supplied by Nacalai Tesque, Inc. Ferric chloride hexahydrate (FeCl3·6H2O, 98%) employed as an oxidizing agent was procured from Bendosen. Sodium hydroxide (NaOH; 98.4%) and sodium sulfate (Na2SO4; 99%) were obtained from Friendemann Schmidt and Merck, respectively. Indium tin oxide (ITO) coated glass with a sheet resistance of 7 Ω sq−1 acquired from Xin Yan Technology Limited was utilized as a current collector. The cellulose nitrate membrane filters (pore size, 0.45 μm and , 47 mm) and filter papers were received from GE Healthcare Life Science, UK and Whatman, UK, respectively. Deionized water (Millipore Milli-Q, 18.3 MΩ cm @ 25 °C) was used throughout the experimental. All chemicals utilized in this study were of analytical grade and used without any further purification unless otherwise stated.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Reproducible P. aeruginosa Biofilm Cultivation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
This protocol was adapted to grow reproducible biofilms under anoxic and normoxic conditions. The method has previously been described (Bjarnsholt et al., 2015 ). The filter biofilms were kept on the same LB plates throughout the experiment. P. aeruginosa was propagated from frozen stock and grown overnight in 20 mL LB medium at 37°C in an orbital shaker at180 rpm. Cultures were adjusted to an optical density (OD600 nm) of 0.05 (UV spectrophotometer UV-1800 UV-VIS, Shimadzu corporation, JP) and 10 μL was transferred to the cellulose nitrate membrane filters (25 mm in diameter, GE Healthcare Life Sciences, United Kingdom). Plates were incubated under normoxic and anoxic conditions and kept in plastic bags with wet paper to avoid dehydration. Two filters were sampled per biological replicate (n = 4) on each sampling day (day 1, 3, 7, 15 and 17). Filters were removed, placed in 10 mL tubes containing 5 mL 0.9% NaCl and vortexed thoroughly (1 min) prior to CFU determination. CFU/mL was determined as previously described.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

RNA-Ribosome Binding Assay Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Radio-labeled RNA (50 nM final concentration) in TAKM5 buffer was heated to 95°C for 10 min and slow cooled to room temperature. RNA was then incubated with increasing amounts of ribosomal subunits/ribosomes for 15 min at 37°C before being rapidly filtrated through a cellulose nitrate membrane filter (0.2μm, GE Healthcare). The cellulose nitrate membranes were washed with 1 ml of cold TAKM5 buffer and placed into 10 ml of EcoLite (+) scintillation cocktail (MP Bio), vortexed for 30 s, and subsequently incubated at room temperature for 30 min, followed by vigorous mixing for 30 s. The retained radioactivity was quantified by scintillation counting (Tri-carb 2810 TR LSA, Perkin Elmer). To ensure our system was able to replicate previously reported data we also performed binding assays with HeLa 40S subunits. Consistent with previous work the WT CrPV IRES bound the 40S with a KD of ∼14 nM, while disruption of PK1 had no effect on 40S binding and disruption PK1 and PK3 in combination abolished 40S binding (Supplementary Table S3) (9 (link),31 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Graphene Quantum Dot Synthesis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
First, pristine GOs were synthesized through the improved Hummer’s method (15 (link)). To prepare GQDs, the obtained solution of GOs in deionized water (3 mg/ml) was vigorously tip-sonicated for 3 hours and vacuum-filtered with cellulose nitrate membrane filter (0.45 μm; GE Healthcare Life Science, Buckinghamshire, UK).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!