The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

9 protocols using cdna ecodry premix

1

Quantification of ERV Expression

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The expression of ERV elements was measured using qPCR as described previously [48 (link)]. GAPDH mRNA expression served as the internal control. The assay was conducted using Bioneer SYBR Green qPCR Premix and an Applied Biosystems 7500 PCR instrument. Total RNA was isolated with TRIzol reagent, and 2.5 ng total RNA was used to produce cDNA from the isolated RNA with cDNA EcoDry Premix (Takara, Kusatsu, Shiga, Japan) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The primer sequences used in this study are listed in Additional file 1: Table S2.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Profiling Gene Expression in Human Retina and RPE

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The retina and RPE/choroid were dissected from at least three non-diseased human eyes of similar age (male and female) and cut into smaller pieces in cold PBS. The tissue samples were snap frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at –80ºC for RNA preparation. Tissue samples (50–100 mg) were dissolved in 1 mL of Trizol reagent (Invitrogen, San Diego, CA). Total RNA was extracted using RNeasy mini kit as recommended (Qiagen, Valencia, CA). Complementary DNA was prepared using 1 μg of total RNA and the RNA to cDNA EcoDry Premix (TaKaRa, Mountain View, CA) and diluted 1:10. qPCR was conducted in triplicates using a Mastercycler Realplex (Eppendorf, Enfield, CT) and TB-Green qPCR Premix (TaKaRa). The cycles for amplification were 95ºC for 2 min; 40 cycles of amplification (95ºC for 15 s, 60ºC for 40 s); and dissociation curve step (95ºC for 15 s, 60ºC for 15 s, 95ºC for 15 s). The relative fluorescent units (RFUs) at a threshold fluorescence value (Ct) were used for linear regression line and assessment of nanograms of DNA. The target gene expression levels were determined by comparing the RFU at the Ct to the standard curve and normalized by the housekeeping gene ribosomal protein L13α (RPL13A). The primer sequences used in this study are listed in Table 1. Each sample was run in triplicates.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Comprehensive Characterization of Gene Expression in Oral Tissues

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
RNA was extracted from rat maxillae frozen from 4 and 8 weeks groups and from the human periodontal ligament progenitors using RNeasy Plus kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). For the RNA extraction from rat maxillae, the samples were first frozen using liquid nitrogen and immediately ground into powder form using a mortar pestle before proceeding to use the RNA extraction kit. One microgram of total extracted RNA was applied towards cDNA generation with RNA to cDNA ecodry premix (Takara, kusatsu, Japan). Real-time RT-PCR was performed using the SYBR green master mix, and sequence specific primers were designed for the study (Table 1) and CFX96 Real Time system (Bio-Rad). The reaction conditions were as follows: 2 min at 50 °C (1 cycle), 10 min at 95 °C (1 cycle), and 15 s at 95 °C, and 1 min at 60 °C (40 cycles). Samples were normalized against GAPDH. To quantify the relative differences in mRNA expression, the standardized comparative CT method (ΔΔCT) was used to determine relative quantity. All values were graphed as the relative mean expression level ± standard deviation. The gene expression for the in vivo rat samples was confirmed for Collagen I (Col I), Collagen III (Col III), E-cadherin (Cdh1), Fibronectin (Fn), Vegf, Runx2 and Osx for the rat samples. For the in vitro samples, gene expression was confirmed for COL I, COL III, FN, VINCULIN (VCL), and VEGF.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

SLC2A3 Expression Quantification via qPCR

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The expression of SLC2A3 was measured using quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR). The 18S rRNA served as the internal control. The assay was conducted using a Bioneer SYBR Green qPCR premix and an Applied Biosystems 7500 PCR machine. Total RNA was isolated with TRIzol™ reagent, and 2.5 ng of total RNA was used to produce cDNA from RNA with cDNA EcoDry Premix (Takara, Kusatsu, Shiga, Japan) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Primer sequences used in this study are shown in Table S2.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Quantitative Real-Time PCR Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total RNA was isolated using TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Concentrations were determined at an absorbance of 260 nm. cDNA was synthesized (1 μg for mRNA) using RNA to cdnaEcoDry Premix (#639543, Clontech Laboratories, Inc., USA) and quantified using Nanodrop (Thermo Scientific USA, ND-0859).qRT- PCR was performed using Power SYBR® Green PCR Master Mix andPower SYBR® Green RT-PCR Reagents Kit (Applied Biosystem, USA)in 7900HT Fast Real-Time PCR System (Applied Biosystem, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Temporal Expression Profiling of C. elegans

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Staged animals were obtained with the hatch-off method (Pepper et al., 2003 (link)) and collected 0, 12, 15, 18, 22, 26 and 41 hours after hatching at 25ºC and flash-frozen. RNA was extracted using a modification of the tissue protocol for the RNeasy micro kit from Qiagen. Frozen worms were ground with a plastic pestle fitting into a 500μl tube. When the worms began to thaw, the tube was dipped into liquid nitrogen to re-freeze. This process was repeated 5 to 6 times before buffer was added and the sample disrupted by passing it through a syringe needle. A DNase treatment was performed on-column. Wash-steps were performed according to the protocol. RNA was eluted with water and concentrations checked by NanoDrop (Thermo Scientific). cDNA was generated from 250ng total RNA using the double-primed RNA to cDNA EcoDry Premix (Takara/Clontech). qPCR was performed using the iQ SYBR Green Supermix with a two-step PCR protocol (3 min 95ºC; 40× 10 sec 95ºC, 60 sec 60ºC; followed by melt curve analysis) on the CFX96 real time PCR detection system (BioRad). Y45F10D.4 served as reference gene (Hoogewijs et al., 2008 (link)) For primer sequences see Table S1. Unknowns were run in triplicates, standards in singles. Data were evaluated using the standard-curve method.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Real-Time PCR Analysis of Mouse Salivary Gland

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Real-time PCR (RT-PCR) was performed as previously described (Woods et al., 2015 (link)). Briefly, whole SMGs were excised from euthanized mice and homogenized in TRIzol reagent (ThermoFisher Scientific, Waltham, MA). Chloroform (0.2 ml/ml TRIzol) was added, and samples were incubated for 5 min at room temperature. Samples were centrifuged at 12,000 × g for 15 min at 4°C, and the resulting aqueous phase was utilized for RNA isolation using the RNeasy Plus Mini Kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA). cDNA was prepared from purified RNA using RNA to cDNA EcoDry Premix (Clontech Laboratories, Mountain View, CA), and RT-PCR was performed on an Applied Biosystems 7500 Real-Time PCR machine using specific Taqman primers for mouse P2Y2R, CD20 (Ms4a1), CD3 (Cd247), Lymphotoxin-α, and 18S (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA). For data analysis, mRNA expression of target genes was normalized to 18S ribosomal RNA as an internal control.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Transcriptomic Analysis of P. gingivalis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
P. gingivalis strain 381 and its derivatives were inoculated in TSBHK, and grown for ~24 h. The cultures were subcultured in pre-reduced TSBHK, and grown to an OD600 of 1.0. Cultures were diluted 1/5 with fresh pre-reduced TSBHK, and 10-μl aliquots of each culture were spotted on blood agar plates. After 24 h of incubation, cultures were scraped off the plates, and the RNA extraction was performed using the Direct-zol RNA Miniprep kit (Zymo Research), according to the instructions provided by the manufacturer with a slight modification.63 RNA samples were delivered to the Gene Expression and Genotyping core of ICBR at the University of Florida. Sample quality determination and sequencing were performed by gene expression and genotyping core in the ICBR.52 (link) The program ‘Rockhopper’64 (link) was used for aligning sequencing reads to the genome reference of P. gingivalis 381. We eliminated any of the sequencing reads with a q value > 0.05 and a fold change of <1.5. The qPCR was performed as described previously.65 (link) Briefly, cDNA was produced from the same amount of RNA from each sample by using cDNA EcoDry Premix (Clontech). cDNAs were mixed with gene-specific primers and iQ SYBR Green Supermix (Bio-Rad). The qPCR was performed using the CFX96 Real-Time System (Bio-Rad).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

qRT-PCR Analysis of scat mRNA

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For qRT-PCR analysis, seven larval ventral ganglia from each genotype were explanted and homogenized in TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen) and total RNA was isolated using a Direct-zol RNA purification kit (Zymogen). RNA concentration and quality were determined using a RNA IQ Assay Kit (Qubit) and a Quibit 4 Fluorometer. RNA quality scores were all above 9.2 indicating that all samples contained high-quality and undegraded RNA. cDNA was synthesized from 1 µg of total RNA for each genotype using a double-primed RNA to cDNA EcoDry premix (Clontech). qPCR primers were designed using Primer3 software to amplify a ∼150 nt amplicon near the 3′ end of the scat mRNA (Fig. S1A). As an internal reference gene, primers were designed to amplify an amplicon of similar size in the housekeeping gene encoding for ribosomal protein S3 (RpS3). This protein is a core component of the small ribosomal subunit. qRT-PCR was conducted on an iQ5 Real Time PCR System (Bio-Rad) using the SsoAdvanced Universal SYBR Green Supermix (Bio-Rad). Three technical replicates were done for each genotype. Melt curve analysis was done at the end of each run and indicated that neither primer set amplified non-specific products. Threshold cycle (Ct) values for each sample were selected by the iQ5 software. The analysis of differential fold change was done using the Livak (ΔΔCt) method (Livak and Schmittgen, 2001 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!