The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

17 protocols using ceftriaxone

1

Antibiotic Susceptibility Testing of Bacterial Isolates

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Antibiotic susceptibility test was done by disc diffusion method following the guidelines of Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) using commercially available antibiotic disc (Oxoid, Basingstoke, United Kingdom). The antibiotic discs used in this study were ampicillin (Amp; 10 µg), sulphamethoxazole-trimethoprim (Sxt; 25 µg), mecillinam (Mel; 25 µg), nalidixic acid (Na; 30 µg), ciprofloxacin (Cip; 5 µg), norfloxacin (Nor; 10 µg), ofloxacin (Of; 5 µg), azithromycin (Azm; 15 µg), and ceftriaxone (Cro; 30 µg) [24] . The minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of nalidixic acid, ciprofloxacin, norfloxacin, ofloxacin, azithromycin, and ceftriaxone were determined by the E-test (AB Biodisk, Solna, Sweden).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Antibiotic Susceptibility of E. coli

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The E coli isolates were subjected to antibiotic susceptibility testing by modified Kirby-Bauer disk diffusion method on Mueller-Hinton agar plates as per the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guidelines.46 The commercially available minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) strips containing the following antimicrobials were tested for the DEC isolates: ampicillin, piperacillin, levofloxacin, ciprofloxacin, ampicillin-sulbactam, piperacillin-tazobactam, amikacin, cefoxitin, gentamicin, ceftazidime, cefotaxime, ceftriaxone, cefepime, aztreonam, imipenem, and meropenem (AB Biodisk, Solna, Sweden). The strips were aseptically placed on the surfaces of the sensitivity agar plates and these were incubated for 18 to 24 hours at 37°C. The MIC values (mg/L) were determined (MIC50 and MIC90 were calculated as the MIC point at which 50% and 90% of the isolates were inhibited) and interpreted according to CLSI guidelines as modified in 2013.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Antibiotic Susceptibility Testing Protocols

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Antimicrobial susceptibilities were determined at the time of isolation by the modified Kirby–Bauer disk diffusion method, as recommended by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI, 2011): piperacillin/tazobactam (100/10 μg), imipenem (10 μg), amikacin (30 μg), ceftazidime (30 μg), ceftriaxone (30 μg), ciprofloxacin (5 μg), gentamicin (30 μg) and colistin (10 μg). Mueller–Hinton agar and antimicrobial discs were purchased from Unipath. For colistin, imipenem, ceftazidime and ceftriaxone, MICs were determined by E-test based on the manufacturer's recommendations (AB Biodisk). The results were interpreted as resistant or sensitive according to current Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute guidelines. Escherichia coli ATCC 25922 was used as the control for these assays.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Antimicrobial Susceptibility of Shigella spp.

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Antimicrobial susceptibility was performed on all Shigella spp. by Kirby-Bauer disc diffusion method on Muller-Hinton agar medium (Merck, Germany), according to the guidelines of the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute [ 8 ]. The antibiotic included ceftriaxone (30 μg), trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (1.25/23.75 μg), amikacin (30 μg), gentamycin (10 μg), ceftazidime (30 μg), cefotaxime (30 μg), ciprofloxacin (5 μg), azithromycin (15 μg), and ampicillin (10 μg) (Mast Ltd., UK.). Also, E. coli ATCC 25922 was used as the control strain. The phenotype of Shigella spp. was defined as MDR according to the International Expert proposal for Interim Standards Guidelines[ 9 ]. The minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) for ceftriaxone, ceftazidime, cefotaxime, ciprofloxacin, amikacin, and gentamicin were determined by E-test (AB Biodisk, Sweden).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing for Zoliflodacin

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For zoliflodacin, agar dilution was performed, according to Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guidelines (M07-A9 and M100-S24; www.clsi.org), on GCVIT agar plates (3.6% Difco GC Medium Base agar (BD, Diagnostics, Sparks, MD, United States) supplemented with 1% IsoVitalex (BD, Diagnostics, Sparks, MD, United States). Additionally, a microbroth dilution method for zoliflodacin (in triplicate) was performed in the medium used in the HFIM, that is, modified fastidious broth (mFB), as previously described (Foerster et al., 2020 (link)). Etest was used for MIC testing of ceftriaxone, cefixime, ciprofloxacin, and azithromycin, in accordance with the manufacturer’s instructions (bioMérieux, Marcy-l’Etoile, France).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Antibiotic Susceptibility Profiling of Isolates

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The antibiotic susceptibility profile of the isolates was identified using the standard disk diffusion method on Mueller–Hinton agar (bioMérieux, Marcy l’Etoile, France). Sixteen different antibiotics were tested, including amoxicillin (20 μg), amoxicillin-clavulanic acid (20/10 μg), piperacillin-tazobactam (30/6 μg), cephalotin (30 μg), ceftriaxone (30 μg), cefepime (30 μg), ertapenem (10 μg), imipenem (10 μg), amikacin (30 μg), gentamicin (10 μg), ciprofloxacin (5 μg), Fosfomycin (200 μg), nitrofurantoin (100 μg), tobramycin (10 μg), trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (1.25/23.75 μg), and colistin (10 μg) (bioMérieux, Marcy l’Etoile, France). The minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) of colistin, ertapenem, and imipenem was identified using the microdilution and the E-test methods, respectively. Each strain was considered to be resistant to colistin, ertapenem, and imipenem if their MICs were greater than 2 mg/L, 1 mg/L, and 8 mg/L, respectively. The results were interpreted according to the European Microbial Medical Sensitivity Committee (EUCAST) 2017 (http://www.Sfmicrobiology.Org/Userfiles/Files/Files/CASFM/CASF%20V2_0_MAI2017.PDF, accessed on 25 September 2020).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Antibiotic Susceptibility of Marseille-P3237

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The antibiotic susceptibility of strain Marseille-P3237 was assessed using the E-test method for the following molecules: benzylpenicillin, amoxicillin, cefotaxime, ceftriaxone, imipenem, amikacin, erythromycin, daptomycin, rifampicin, minocycline, teicoplanin, vancomycin, colistin and metronidazole (bioMérieux).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Antibiotic Resistance Profiling of Salmonella

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To confirm the transfer of resistance phenotype, antibiotic susceptibility patterns of the donor, recipients, and transconjugants were determined after their growth on Mueller–Hinton (MH, Difco) agar by disk diffusion method in accordance with Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute [CLSI] (2014) using commercially available disks (Becton Dickinson Company, Sparks, MD) namely, ampicillin (AMP), cefuroxime (CXM), ceftriaxone (CRO), cefotaxime (CTX), cefotaxime/clavulanic acid (CTX-CLA), ceftazidime (CAZ), ceftazidime/clavulanic acid (CAZ-CLA), chloramphenicol (CHL), nalidixic acid (NA), ciprofloxacin (CIP), ofloxacin (OFX), norfloxacin (NOR), imipenem (IPM), streptomycin (STR), azithromycin (AZM) tetracycline (TET), trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (SXT). To measure the increase of resistance in the transconjugants, MICs of antibiotics (ceftriaxone, imipenem, tetracycline, and sulfamethoxazole/trimethoprim) were determined by E test (AB bioMérieux, Solna, Sweden) in comparison with the wild NDM-positive Salmonella isolate.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Antibiotic Susceptibility of S. Typhi

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Frozen isolates were re-cultured and serotyped based on the White-Kaufman-Le Minor standard method [12 ]. Confirmed S. Typhi isolates were screened for antibiotic susceptibility using the Kirby Bauer disc diffusion method and results were interpreted based on the 2017 CLSI guidelines [13 ]. The following antibiotics were used; ciprofloxacin (5 μg), ceftriaxone (30 μg), chloramphenicol (30 μg), nalidixic acid (30 μg), tetracycline (30 μg) and ampicillin (10 μg) (Oxoid, United Kingdom). Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC; mg/L) for ceftriaxone, ciprofloxacin, and azithromycin were done using the E-test (bioMérieux, Marcy l’Étoile, France). Escherichia coli ATCC 25922 was used as a quality control. Multi-drug resistance (MDR) was defined as acquired non-susceptibility to at least one agent in three or more antimicrobial categories [14 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Antibiotic Susceptibility Determination

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For determination of zoliflodacin MICs (mg/L), agar dilution on GCVIT agar plates (Foerster et al., 2019 (link)) and microbroth dilution [in triplicates in the HFIM medium, i.e., modified Fastidious Broth (mFB)] were performed, as previously described (Jacobsson et al., 2021 (link)). Etest was used to determine MICs (mg/L) of ceftriaxone, cefixime, ciprofloxacin, and azithromycin, in accordance with the manufacturer’s instructions (bioMérieux, Marcy-l’Etoile, France).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!