The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Jsm 7600f sem

Manufactured by JEOL
Sourced in Japan, United States

The JSM-7600F is a field emission scanning electron microscope (FE-SEM) manufactured by JEOL. It provides high-resolution imaging and analysis capabilities for a wide range of materials and applications. The JSM-7600F's core function is to generate and detect electron signals, which are then used to create detailed images of the sample surface.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

17 protocols using jsm 7600f sem

1

SEM Imaging of Cell-Grown Substrates

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The substrates with cells grown were washed with PBS and fixed in a mixture of 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA, Electron Microscopy Sciences, Hatfield, PA, USA) and 2% glutaraldehyde (Fisher Scientific, Pittsburgh, PA, USA) in PBS at ambient for 4 h. The samples were then rinsed with deionized water and progressively dehydrated using a Tousimis Autosamdri-815 CO2 Critical Point Dryer (Tousimis Co., Rockville, MD, USA).
The substrates with and without cells grown were sputter-coated with a gold layer of ~10 nm thick by using a Denton Vacuum Desk V sputter unit (Denton Vacuum, LLC, Moorestown, NJ, USA), and imaged in a JEOL JSM-7600F SEM.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Comprehensive Characterization of MoS2 Nanosheets

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
PANalytical Xpert Pro diffractometer with, Cu K1 = 0.154056 nm as a radiation source was used to record the X-ray diffraction (XRD) of MoS2 NSs. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) images were recorded from FEI TECNAI G2 S-Twin, equipped with a 200 kV field emission gun (FEG). The field emission scanning electron microscopy (FE-SEM) images were obtained from JEOL, JSM-7600F SEM at an accelerated voltage of 0.1 to 30 kV equipped with X-ray dispersive spectroscopy (EDX). The chemical composition of the MoS2 NSs was detected by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS, ESCALAB 250Xi). The Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET) (BELSORB-28SA/18SA/18PLUS) analyser studied the surface area and pore size from the N2 adsorption data.40,41 (link)
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Exosome and Vesicle Characterization by SEM

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Pellets containing extracellular vesicles isolated from healthy cells (i.e., exosomes) and from apoptotic and necrotic cells were vortexed and resuspended in 0.2-1 ml DPBS. Exosomes and nano-scaled apoptotic vesicles or necrotic bodies (microscaled parts of apoptotic vesicles or necrotic bodies were removed prior to ultracentrifugation) were fixed in a 2% EMS-quality paraformaldehyde aqueous solution. The samples were then diluted in distilled (dl) water in serial dilutions, added in 1-5 μl vesicle mixtures to cleaned silicon chips, which were sonicated in acetone, ethanol and distilled water for 5 min in each solvent, flushed by water and blown dry, and immobilized after drying vesicles under a ventilation hood. Samples on silicon chips were mounted on a SEM stage by carbon paste. To make surface conductive, a coating of 2-5 nm gold-palladium alloy was applied by sputtering (SPI-Module Sputtering, Argon as gas for plasma) before imaging by scanning electron microscopy Hitachi S-4700 or a JEOL JSM-7600F SEM. SEM was performed under low beam energies (5.0-10.0 kV). For best vesicle morphology under SEM, fresh isolated exosomes were fixed and immobilized on silicon right after isolation, and imaged within 7 days. Analysis of exosome sizes were done using the SEM images via ImageJ and the density distribution of exosome diameters were obtained using R/Bioconductor.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Comprehensive Characterization of Nanostructured Materials

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
HAADF-STEM images were taken using a JEOL3100R05 Double Cs Corrected S/TEM operated at 300 kV, with a collection angle of 59–200 mrad. The EDS mapping was carried out on a Thermo Fisher Scientific Talos F200X S/TEM equipped with a Super-X EDS detector. The TEM specimens were prepared by drop-casting wet gel onto carbon-coated 200-mesh Cu grids. The particle size distribution was estimated using Nano Measurer 1.2 software. The crystalline phase was characterized by PXRD using a Bruker D2 Phaser diffractometer. PXRD patterns were analyzed by comparison to the powder diffraction file database of the International Center for Diffraction Data. The chemical state and elementratio were analyzed by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (Thermo Fisher Scientific NEXSA UV and X-ray Photoelectron Spectrometer). XPS peaks were fitted using a composite function (30% Lorentzian + 70% Gaussian) and calibrated according to the C1s peak at 284.8 eV via the Avantage software. The elementary ratio of Pb/Cd was also identified by ICP-MS (Agilent 7700x ICP-MS). The surface area and pore size determined from nitrogen physisorption data (Micrometrics ASAP 2020 analyzer) using the BET and Barrett–Joyner–Halenda models. The surface and cross-section morphology of the xerogel film were analyzed by field-emission scanning electron microscopy (JEOL JSM 7600F SEM).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Characterization of G/SA Sponges

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A JSM-7600F SEM (JEOL, Tokyo, Japan) was used to investigate the surface morphologies of G/SA and G/SA5 sponges. FTIR spectra were recorded on a Spectrum Two Spectrometer (Perkin Elmer, Akron, OH, USA). TG analysis was carried out using a model Q5000 TGA (TA Instruments, New Castle, DE, USA) with a heating rate of 10 °C/min under nitrogen atmosphere.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Lyophilization and SEM Analysis of Phytosomes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Phytosome samples were frozen at −80 °C overnight; afterward, lyophilized in a high vacuum of 34 Pa using a lyophilizer (Labconco Plus 12; Labconco, Kansas City, MO, USA) for 8 h with a condenser at −43 °C. Lyophilized phytosomes were stored in a sealed glass ampoule at 4 °C. One drop of lyophilized sample was placed on a brass electron microscope tube and coated with copper particles for sputtering. Representative images of the samples were taken and particle diameters were calculated using scanning electron microscopy (JEOL JSM-7600F SEM) with a voltage of 20.0 KV at a working distance of 15.1 mm. Details of the morphological structure of the phytosomes were observed at up to an amplitude of 10,000× and a working distance that allowed minute observations with increasing depth of focus.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Scanning Electron Microscopy Preparation of Plant Buds

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Buds were fixed in an excess of ice-cold Carnoy (EtOH absolute:Acetic acid glacial 3:1) with the application of a vacuum for 15 min for three times with Carnoy exchanges, and then left overnight in Carnoy in the cold room under weak stirring. The next day, Carnoy was replaced by ice-cold 70–75% EtOH and the samples stored at 4 °C until use. Before scanning, samples were dissected by using a light microscope, while emerging in 70% EtOH, then two times washed in 96% EtOH, each for 20 min., and two times in 96% acetone, each for 30 min. Tissue drying, mounting, and coating followed Pramanik et al. [84 (link)]. Samples were observed with a field emission scanning electron microscope (JSM-7600F SEM, JEOL Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) using the settings and picture sizes described [84 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Synthesis and Characterization of Silver Nanoparticles in Cellulose

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The synthesis of silver nanoparticles in the cellulose was observed by UV-Vis spectrophotometry (from 300–600 nm), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and transmission electron microscopy (TEM)36 . For SEM, samples were dried and covered with gold/palladium (around 4 nm thickness) then analyzed on a JEOL JSM-7600F SEM. TEM images of cellulose were acquired using a TEM Tecnai 12 BioTWIN (manufactured by FEI) coupled to a SIS Megaview 3 camera at acceleration voltage of 120 kV. Before the analysis, diluted samples (0.2% aqueous) were sonicated for 30 min using an ice-cold ultrasound bath (output of 1200 W). Drops of the sample (about 8 μL) were left on the grid for 5 min, then negatively stained with 1% uranyl acetate and finally glow discharged. Copper grids with a formvar/carbon support film were used.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Antibacterial Nanocomposite Evaluation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Twenty microliters (20 µL) of bacterial suspension was added to 40 mL of TSB and incubated at 120 rpm at 37 °C for 4 h. Then, 1 mg of TC/PG nanocomposite was added. The bacteria with and without nanocomposite treatment were fixed using 4% glutaraldehyde for 24 h. The specimens were dehydrated with sequential ethanol treatments for 10 min and lyophilized. They were fixed on an aluminum stub, coated with platinum, and observed by a JSM-7600F SEM (JEOL, Tokyo, Japan).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Scanning Electron Microscopy of Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cultures of LGG-WT and LGG-MTK56N were washed with PBS and then resuspended in fresh PBS. An aliquot (35 μl) of the resulting suspension was transferred to a Nanopercolator filter (JEOL, Tokyo, Japan). The liquid was removed using a 10-ml syringe, and the cells were fixed by immersion of the filter in 2.5% glutaraldehyde (TAAB Laboratories Equipment, Ltd., Berks, United Kingdom) with 2.0% paraformaldehyde prepared in 0.1 M cacodylate buffer for 1 h at room temperature. Following fixation, the plasma membrane was stained by 3 gentle washes with 0.1 M cacodylate buffer and soaking for 1 h in 1% osmium tetroxide. After dehydration by passage through a series of ethanol solutions, each filter was subjected to 2 rounds of incubation (52°C, 30 min) in t-butyl alcohol and then stored at −80°C until analyzed. After overnight lyophilization using a DC401 freeze-dryer (Yamato Scientific, Tokyo, Japan), osmium coating was performed using a Neoc-AN osmium coater (Meiwafosis Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan). SEM images were collected using a JSM-7600F SEM (JEOL) at an accelerating voltage of 5 kV.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!