The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Energy minimization server

Manufactured by YASARA

The Energy Minimization Server is a high-performance computing solution designed for optimizing molecular structures. It utilizes advanced algorithms to efficiently minimize the energy of molecular models, a crucial step in various scientific and computational chemistry applications.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

Lab products found in correlation

23 protocols using energy minimization server

1

Optimizing Protein 3D Structure

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
YASARA Energy Minimization Server39 (link)
was used to attain a minimum energy arrangement of the constructed 3D structure of the HP. Subsequently, the minimized 3D structure was further optimized using GalaxyRefine.40 (link)
After analyzing all the potential structures generated by GalaxyRefine, arguably the one having the best quality and performance was selected.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Structure Refinement of DGL-Orlistat Complex

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Structure refinement and energy minimization of the DGL–orlistat complex (Fig. 7B) was conducted using the YASARA Energy Minimization Server38 (link).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Homology Modeling of Human σ2 Receptor

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The 3D structure of human σ2 receptor was built by homology modeling using our previously reported method (Alamri et al., 2020b ). Briefly, the protein sequence of human σ2 receptor amino acids 1–176 (ID: Q5BJF2) in FASTA format was retrieved from UniProtKB database. The 3D structure of σ2 receptor was determined by homology modeling using the I-TASSER (Iterative threading assembly refinement) webserver (https://zhanglab.dcmb.med.umich.edu/I-TASSER/). This hierarchical approach is an integrated online platform for automated protein structure and function prediction starting from the primary amino acid sequence and based on the sequence to structure to function approach (Zhang, 2008 ). The structure of the mitochondrial translocator protein (PDB ID: 2MGY) was identified to be a closely related protein, so it was used as a template for the structure (Jaremko et al., 2014 (link)). The predicted structure contained was composed of 7 α helices. The model was subjected to energy minimization by YASARA Energy Minimization Server (http://www.yasara.org/minimizationserver.htm) using YASARA force field to remove all bad contacts and reduce the model energy globally (Krieger et al., 2002 (link), Krieger and Vriend, 2014 (link)). This model was validated by several equations including ERRAT, Verify 3D, ProSA, ProQ, QMEAN, and PROCHECK as we reported previously (Alamri et al., 2020b ).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Docking analysis of shikonin with PKM2 enzyme

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Global docking analysis for shikonin with PKM2 was performed using AutoDock Vina (18 ). The protein structure of PKM2 (19 (link)) (PDB ID: 1T5A) was downloaded from the RCSB Protein Data Bank (20 (link)), cleaned and processed in PyMOL 2.5 (21 (link)). The chemical structure of shikonin was downloaded from PubChem (PubChem ID: 479503), and energy optimization was performed using Chem3D 20.1 software. The protein and ligand files were prepared using AutoDockTools (ADT). Polar hydrogens, Kollman charges, and water molecule deletion were assigned using ADT and saved in PDBQT format. The grid size was set to 86 × 80 × 87 along the axes with a spacing of 1.000 Å, and the grid center was designated at X = 70.806, Y = –2.988 and Z = 90.970 to cover the entire protein surface. The docking parameters of exhaustiveness, number of modes, and energy range were set at 8, 20 and 4 kcal/mol, respectively. Rigid docking of PKM2 and shikonin was scored, and binding modes were generated using AutoDock Vina. The different binding modes of the docking were energy-optimized using the YASARA Energy Minimization server (22 (link)). The optimized poses were finally visualized and analyzed using PyMOL 2.5, Discovery Studio Visualizer v21.1.0, and Protein–Ligand Interaction profiler (PLIP) (23 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

3D Protein Structure Optimization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
We accessed the modeled 3D structure of α 6 β 2 in SWISS-MODEL to check the protein geometry. Next, we improved the main chain and side chain stereochemistry by using the YASARA energy minimization server to refine the homology model [35 (link)]. We then used MOLPROBITY and PROCHECK to check the stereochemical quality and reliability of the initial and the refined models’ Ramachandran plot and statistics [20 (link),36 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Structural Refinement and Validation of Protein Models

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
3D models of the candidate proteins were subjected to structural refinement and energy minimization using YASARA force field in YASARA energy minimization server, without fixing any atoms [30 (link)]. The stereochemical qualities for energy minimized models were discerned through Ramachandran pot using PROCHECK [31 ]. The WHATIF server confirms the average coarse packing qualities and Ramachandran Z-scores of the refined structures [32 (link)]. Non-bonded interactions among different atoms of models were validated using ERRAT [33 (link)]. X-ray and NMR spectroscopic structural validation were verified by ProSA-web server [34 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Structural Modeling and Validation of E6 Protein

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Phyre2 server [28 (link)] was employed for modeling of the tertiary structure of E6 protein followed by energy minimization using YASARA Energy Minimization Server [29 (link)]. Further the protein three dimension structure in pdb format was subjected to SCWRL4.0 software [30 (link)] for protein side chain modeling before docking. Procheck [31 ], ProSA-web [32 (link)], and ProQ [33 (link)] server were used for assessing the model reliability which further verified by ERRAT server [34 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Computational Evaluation of PFAS-TSH Receptor Interaction

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The possible docking of PFAS to TSH receptor (TSH-R) was investigated through a computational approach. The structure of the extracellular domain of the human (TSH-R) is available as deposited 3D structure in the Protein Data Bank (PDB code 2XWT). The computational docking analyses were carried out by considering only this domain. Once extracted from crystallography template, TSH-R was subjected to energy minimization by Yasara Energy Minimization Server (YASARA Energy Minimization Server) to obtain an estimate of its unliganded configuration. As there are no experimental models of TSH-R in complex with TSH, and it was estimated using the experimental models of the 2 TSH subunits and taking the FSH-FSHR complex as a template, whose structure was experimentally obtained (PDB code: 1XWD).
The possibile binding of PFAS to the TSH-R extracellular domain was evaluated by the Autodock Vina algorithm (32 (link)) implemented in the UCSF Chimera 1.12 (https://www.cgl.ucsf.edu/chimera/) molecular modeling software (33 (link)).
The molecular dynamics procedure, based on the method by Kuriata et al. (34 (link)) and available as a web server (https://biocomp.chem.uw.edu.pl/CABSflex2), was used to evaluate the conformations the receptor can acquire after binding with PFAS and to compare them with those of the free receptor.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Structural Modeling of BSH-Bile Acid Complexes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
BSH protein structures were predicted from amino acid sequences using I-TASSER [52 (link)]. PDB coordinate files for each conjugated bile acid substrate were generated from Isomeric SMILES in the PubChem database using the National Cancer Institute’s Online SMILES Translator and Structure File Generator. Bile acid and BSH PDB files were merged using the crystal structure of the C. perfringens BSH bound to TDCA as a guide in Coot [19 (link),53 (link)]. This BSH was chosen as it was the most closely related for which a structure was available. Finally, each predicted BSH/Bile acid complex was energetically minimized using the YASARA Energy Minimization Server [54 (link)]. Distance measurements for hydrogen bonding and hydrophobic interactions as well as figures for publication were generated with PyMOL (Schrödinger). CABS-flex was used to simulate protein structure fluctuations and assess the range of motion of loop structures within BSH protein structures [21 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Computational Docking of Haloacetic Acids

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Computational docking of haloacetic acids (Cl‐, Br‐, and I‐) and of the 2‐bromopropionic acid to ZgHAD X‐ray structure was performed using AutoDock Vina (Trott & Olson, 2010 (link)). The initial coordinates of these molecules were generated from the SMILES string using PHENIX.eLBOW (Liebschner et al., 2019 (link)). The ZgHAD protein was kept rigid during docking. A docking grid with dimensions 25 Å × 25 Å × 25 Å, encompassing the entire active site, was used. The calculation yielded nine possible models, of which the one with the highest affinity in kcal/mol was selected as the most likely. Then the complexes were energy minimized using the Yasara energy minimization server (Krieger et al., 2009 ).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!