The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Meta 510 laser scanning microscope

Manufactured by Zeiss
Sourced in Germany

The ZEISS Meta 510 Laser Scanning Microscope is a high-performance imaging system designed for advanced microscopy applications. It utilizes a laser light source to generate high-resolution images of samples. The instrument is capable of capturing detailed information about the structure and composition of various materials and biological specimens.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

17 protocols using meta 510 laser scanning microscope

1

Quantifying ATG5 Fluorescence in l-LNvs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To measure the fluorescence intensity of ATG5 protein in the large ventral lateral neurons (l-LNvs), we used confocal microscopy. We identified cell bodies of l-LNvs using the anti-PDF antibody, and we scanned the same cell for labelling with the anti-ATG5 antibody. We selected all l-LNv cell bodies and measured the fluorescence intensity of the ATG5 protein. Images were collected with a Zeiss Meta 510 Laser Scanning Microscope (Additional file 2: Table S2).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

PDF Neuron Quantification in Adult Brains

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Whole-mount 7 days old adult brains were labeled with anti-PDF serum and next they were examined using a Zeiss Meta 510 Laser Scanning Microscope. PDF-labeled cells were counted manually through all z-stacks for both hemispheres. The mean number of cells per cluster and per hemisphere was calculated.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Analyzing L2 Dendritic Tree Perimeter

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For analyses of the L2 dendritic tree perimeter, we used the progeny of crossing the 21D-Gal4 line with the UAS-mCD8-GFP line (Fig 1). To inhibit the expressions of the Tor, Atg5 or Atg7 genes in L2 monopolar cells, additional crosses of 21D-Gal4>UAS-mCD8-GFP line with UAS-Tor-RNAi, UAS-Atg5-RNAi or UAS-Atg7-RNAi transgenic lines were performed. Seven-day-old males from the above crosses were decapitated at four time points: ZT1, ZT4, ZT13 and ZT16. The heads were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde in 0.1 M PBS and cryoprotected overnight in 25% sucrose solution. Cryostat sections (14 μm in thickness) were prepared. To enhance GFP fluorescence in L2 cells, frozen sections were immunostained with rabbit polyclonal anti-GFP primary serum (Nouvos Biological, diluted 1:1000) followed by goat anti-rabbit secondary antibody conjugated to AlexaFluor 488 (Invitrogen, diluted 1:1000). The cryosections were mounted in Vectashield medium (Vector). Sections of the distal lamina were examined using a Zeiss Meta 510 Laser Scanning Microscope. The images were deconvolved using Huygens Professional software. Changes in the perimeter of the L2 dendritic trees were examined by tracing the outline of the dendrites and the axons of L2 cell cross-sections. Measurements were performed using ImageJ (v. 1.4 g with Java 1.6.0_05) software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Circadian Rhythm in Fly Brain Lamina

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Male flies 7 days old were decapitated at Zeitgeber Time (ZT, with ZT0 = lights ON, and ZT12 = lights OFF) 1, 4, 13 and 16 under LD 12:12 conditions. Heads were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde for 4 h, washed twice in PBS, cryoprotected in 12.5% and 25% sucrose, frozen in liquid nitrogen, and then sectioned (20 μm thickness) on a cryostat. The sections were washed in PBS for 30 min and then five times in phosphate buffer with added 0.2% Triton X 100 (PBT). Afterwards, they were incubated in a mix of 5% Normal Goat Serum (NGS) and 0.5% Bovine Serum Albumin (BSA) for 30 min. Mouse nc82 primary antibodies were added to the mix (1:25) and incubated for 48 h at 4°C. The sections were then washed six times in PBT/BSA, blocked in 5% NGS for 45 min and incubated with Cy3 conjugated goat anti-mouse secondary antibodies (Jackson Immuno Research, 1:500), overnight at 4°C. After a series of washes the sections were mounted in Vectashield medium (Vector) and examined with a Zeiss Meta510 Laser Scanning Microscope. Confocal images of the distal lamina were analyzed using ImageJ. The fluorescence intensities of single cartridges were measured as mean gray values. GraphPad Prism software was used for statistics and making graphs. Data were analyzed using one way ANOVA Tukey’s multiple comparisons test.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Measuring L2 Dendritic Tree Perimeter

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To measure the L2 dendritic tree perimeter, we used 21D > mCD8::GFP (as control) and MARCM flies. Sections of the distal lamina were examined using a Zeiss Meta 510 Laser Scanning Microscope. Images were deconvolved using Huygens Professional software (Scientific Volume Imaging). Changes in the perimeter of L2 dendritic trees were examined by tracing the outline of dendrites and axons of L2 cell cross-sections. Measurements were performed using ImageJ software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Circadian Regulation of PDF Neurons

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Flies were collected at ZT2 (two hours after lights-on in LD 12:12) and ZT14 (two hours after lights-off in LD12:12), their heads were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde and brains were isolated. After washing in 0.2% phosphate buffer saline with Triton X-100 (PBST) and 30 min of blocking in Normal Goat Serum (NGS) they were incubated overnight with anti-PDF primary antibody (PDF C7 1:500, Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank). Next, samples were washed in PBST and incubated with secondary antibodies (1:500 anti-mouse Cy3, Abcam). Whole brains were mounted in Vectashield medium (Vector) and examined with a Zeiss Meta 510 Laser Scanning Microscope.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Measuring ROS Levels in Mutant Flies

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To measure whether ROS levels were increased in mul1A6 and park1 mutants, 7-day-old males (N = 10) of mutants and controls were decapitated at ZT0. Brains were isolated and washed twice in PBS for 10 min. Next, the tissue was incubated with MitoSOX (ThermoFisher) for 10 min and mounted in Vectashield medium. Images were collected with a Zeiss Meta 510 Laser Scanning Microscope. The method has been described by Scialò et al. [19 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Quantifying G-quadruplex structures in HeLa cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
HeLa cells were seeded on glass coverslips in a 24-well plate at a density of 2 × 104 cells/well. After 24 h of treatment with Dicentrine (0, 10, 25, 50 µM), cells were fixed in 4% formaldehyde in PBS (10 min at RT) and permeabilized with 0.25% Triton X-100 (5 min at RT). For immuno-labeling, cells were incubated with a mouse mAb that specifically recognizes DNA/RNA G-quadruplex structures (BG4 antibody; Absolute Antibody, Oxford, UK, #Ab00174-1.1). After 2 h of incubation at RT, cells were washed three times with PBS 1X and then incubated for an additional 1 h with an antibody anti-mouse IgG (H + L), F(ab’)2 Fragment (Alexa Fluor 555 Conjugate; Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, MA, USA, #4409S). Nuclei were stained with 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI; Sigma-Aldrich, D9542), and fluorescence signals were recorded by using a Zeiss Laser Scanning Microscope 510 Meta (63× magnification) (Zeiss, Jena, Germany).
IF experiments were quantified using ImageJ (version 1.53e, National Institutes of Health, NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA). At least 25 cells were screened for each condition, and the results were expressed as the fold change of the fluorescence intensity over the negative control. Histograms show the mean ± SD of three independent experiments.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Confocal Microscopy Imaging Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Immunostaining was evaluated using a Zeiss Laser Scanning Microscope 510 Meta, Zeiss LSM 710 (Carl Zeiss, Thornwood, NY, RRID:SciEx_11637) or Leica TCS SP2 laser-scanning confocal microscope (RRID:nlx_156339) with a Zeiss C-Apochromat 40x 1.2 NA corrected water objective, a Zeiss Plan-Neofluar 63x 1.4 NA corrected oil objective or a Leica HCX PL APO 63x/1.4-0.6 Oil Lbd BL at a resolution of 1024×1024 pixels. Images are presented in the figures either as single image scan or as projections of 3–8 image scans (z-axis step between 0.3-0.5 μm). Confocal images were analyzed using Zeiss LSM 510 proprietary software (version 3.2). The intensity levels and contrast of the final images were adjusted in Adobe Photoshop CS2 v.9.02 (Adobe Systems, San Jose, CA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Multiparametric Analysis of Telomere-related Proteins

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells fixed with 2% formaldehyde and permeabilized in 0.25% Triton X100 in phosphate buffered saline (PBS) for 5 min at room temperature (RT) were incubated with the following primary antibodies: mAb anti-TRF2 (clone 4A794; Millipore, Billerica, MA, USA); pAb anti-TRF2 (Novus Biologicals, Littleton, CO, USA); pAb anti-SIRT6 (ab62738; Abcam, Cambridge, UK); mAb anti-phospho-Histone H2AX (Ser139, clone JBW301; Millipore). Then, samples were incubated with the secondary antibodies (goat anti-mouse FITC, donkey anti-goat Cy™5, or goat anti-rabbit FITC; Jackson Immunoresearch, Suffolk, UK; 1:250) and nuclei were counterstained with DAPI. Fluorescence signals were analyzed in stained samples recorded using either a Leica DMIRE2 microscope equipped with a Leica DFC 350FX camera and elaborated by Leica FW4000 deconvolution software (Leica, Solms, Germany) or a Zeiss Laser Scanning Microscope 510 Meta and elaborated by Zen2009 software (Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!