The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

7 protocols using somatom sensation 16

1

Non-Contrast CT Imaging Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Patients were imaged on the following CT scanners without contrast administration or electrocardiographic gating: GE Optima 660, GE Lightspeed VCT, Neurologica Corp Caretom, Siemens Somatom Sensation 16, and GE Optima CT 540. Images were reconstructed at 2.5 mm slice thickness. Scans with reconstructions at different slice thickness were excluded.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Multicenter Contrast-Enhanced CT for PMT Segmentation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Four CT scanners, including a Siemens SOMATOM Definition Flash, Siemens SOMATOM Definition AS, Siemens SOMATOM Sensation 16, and GE Optima CT660, were used to acquire CECT images. Contrast medium (60 to 120 mL) was intravenously administered at a rate of 1.5 mL/s, followed by a 20 mL saline flush. All CECT images were obtained 90 s after contrast medium administration. The image size was 512 × 512 pixels. All images were reconstructed in 5 mm slices with a smooth standard convolution kernel (B40f), as previously described [31 (link)]. After CECT images were imported into the open-source software 3D Slicer version 4.10.2, the PMTs were manually contoured by a thoracic radiologist (C.Y.L.) with 9 years of experience, blinded to patient diagnosis, using the built-in paint tool as previously described [32 (link)]. Tumor segmentation was performed in the mediastinal setting (window level, 50 HU; window width, 350 HU) on the axial CT plane. For normalization, all CT voxels were resampled to 1 mm3 using a cubic interpolation.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Comprehensive CT Imaging Protocol for Diverse Research

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All CT images were obtained using Siemens SOMATOM Definition Flash, Siemens SOMATOM Definition AS, Siemens SOMATOM Sensation 16, GE Optima CT660, GE Revolution CT, GE Bright Speed Elite, GE light speed VCT, and TOSHIBA CT64-TSX-01A64. The CT protocols were as follows: 120 kVp; tube current, 150–200 mAs with automatic tube current modulation. The section thickness ranged between 0.7 mm and 1.5 mm, and the image size was 512 × 512 pixels. The detailed protocol and contrast materials are summarized in Table E1. Three patients received solely non-enhanced CT scan due to renal function impairment, while the other patients received both non-enhanced and enhanced CT scan. Contrast enhanced images were obtained after intravenous administration of contrast medium (injection dose 60-120 mL at a rate of 1.5-3 ml/s) followed by a 20 ml saline flush. Contrast enhanced images were obtained 90s after contrast agent administration. All images were reconstructed into 5-mm sections.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Non-contrast CT Imaging Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Patients were imaged on any of the following CT scanners without contrast administration or electrocardiographic gating: GE Optima 660, GE Lightspeed VCT, Siemens Somatom Sensation 16, and GE Optima CT 540. Images were reconstructed at 2.5 mm slice thickness.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Thoracic CT Scanning in Diverse Patients

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Between January 2014 and June 2014, routine thoracic CT was performed on 4573 patients for different reasons, such as health check-up, pulmonary disease, trauma, lung cancer follow-up, or detection of metastasis.
CT scans were performed using a 16-slice MDCT scanner (Siemens SOMATOM Sensation 16) or a 64-slice MDCT scanner (GE LightSpeed VCT). Thoracic CT scanning was performed from the lower part of the neck to adrenal glands. Axial section data were reconstructed at a thickness of 3 mm using a 3 mm slice interval for the SOMATOM Sensation 16 or at a thickness of 2.5 mm using a 2.5 mm slice interval for the LightSpeed VCT, respectively. All images were processed with standard mediastinal (width, 350 HU; level 20 HU) and lung (width, 1500 HU; level −700 HU) window settings.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Standardized Hip Imaging Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Imaging of the hips was acquired helically in the supine position on five different clinical whole-body multi-detector CT machines (Siemens SOMATOM Sensation 16, Sensation 64, Definition Flash, Definition AS+, and a GE Medical Systems Discovery 690). The acquisition protocol involved imaging inclusively from the superior margin of the acetabuli to the lesser trochanters. All acquisitions were processed with a standard smooth-edge body kernel and reconstructed with axial slice separation ranging from 0.75 to 1.5 mm, equivalent to slice thickness in all cases. In-plane pixel spacing varied from 0.59 to 0.78 mm, with field of view consistently 512 by 512 pixels. Peak kV was routinely 120 kV. When available from the fully anonymised metadata, recorded exposure ranged from 67-274 mAs, varying due to routine use of dose limiting.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Non-Contrast Cardiac CT Imaging

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Patients were imaged on the following CT scanners without contrast administration or electrocardiographic gating: GE Optima 660, GE Lightspeed VCT, Neurologica Corp Caretom, Siemens Somatom Sensation 16 and GE Optima CT 540. Images were reconstructed at 2.5 mm slice thickness. Scans with reconstructions at different slice thickness were excluded.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!