The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

25 protocols using supelcowax 10 column

1

Geraniol Extraction and Characterization from Tea Leaves

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The methods for the collection and analysis of geraniol were described in our published paper [5 (link)]. Solid-phase microextraction (SPME, 2 cm—50/30 μm DVB/CarboxenTM/PDMS Stable FlexTM) was used to collect volatiles emitted from tea leaves in a 250 mL glass container at 25 °C for 1 h. Then, the volatiles collected on the SPME were analyzed by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS). The experiments were performed with three replicates.
The GC-MS system comprised a QP2010 SE instrument (Shimadzu Corporation, Kyoto, Japan) equipped with a SUPELCOWAXTM 10 column (30 m × 0.25 mm × 0.25 μm, Supelco Inc., Bellefonte, PA, USA). The GC temperature conditions were as follows: 60 °C for 3 min, increase of 4 °C/min to 150 °C, increase of 30 °C/min to 240 °C, and then hold at 240 °C for 15 min. The splitless mode was used with a splitless time of 1 min, and helium was the carrier gas (flow rate, 1.0 mL/min). The injector temperature was 230 °C. Mass spectrometry was performed in full scan mode (mass range m/z 40–200). The geraniol authentic standard was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (Cat. Number 163333, St. Louis, MO, USA). The product was identified by comparing the mass spectra and retention time with standard substance.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Analysis of Internal Volatiles in Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The extraction and analysis of internal volatiles were performed according to the previous study [28 (link)]. Two hundred mg of sample was extracted by 2 mL dichloromethane containing 4 nmol of n-ethyl decanoate as an internal standard in a shaker at room temperature overnight. The extraction solution was dried over anhydrous sodium sulfate and concentrated to 200 μL using nitrogen stream (MIULAB NDK200-1, MIU Instruments CO., Ltd., Hangzhou, China). Then, 1 μL of the extraction was subjected to gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS QP2010 SE, Shimadzu Corporation, Kyoto, Japan) analysis. Samples were injected into GC injection port held at 230 °C for 1 min and all of the injections were made in splitless mode. Volatile compounds were separated on a SUPELCOWAXTM 10 column (30 m × 0.25 mm, 0.25 μm, Supelco Inc., Bellefonte, PA, USA). Helium was used as a carrier gas with a velocity 1.0 mL/min. The GC oven temperature was 60 °C for 3 min, ramp of 4 °C/min to 240 °C, and then 240 °C for 20 min. The mass spectrometry was operated with full scan mode (mass range m/z 40–200). The relative content of each compound from samples was calculated as GC-MS peak area ratio of analyte to ethyl decanoate (internal standard).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Insect Enzyme Assay for Terpene Synthesis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Two major pests of tea plants and one major pest of sweet potato were used to assay the GES activity of crude enzymes extracted from the insects. These insects were larvae of Ectropis oblique and Euproctis pseudoconspersa, and adult of Cylas formicarius. Briefly, one E. oblique/E. pseudoconspersa larvae or ten C. formicarius adults were homogenized with 250 μL buffer (50 mM Tris HCl, 10 mM MgCl2, 5 mM DTT, pH 7.5) on ice. The supernatant was transferred to a new tube and saved as crude enzyme after centrifuge at 12,000 g for 20 min. The reaction volume was 1 mL containing 50 mM Tris HCl (pH 7.5), 10 mM MgCl2, 5 mM DTT, 100 μg crude enzyme, and 5 μg GPP. The reaction was incubated at 30 °C for 90 min. The volatile product was collected by SPME for 30 min at 42 °C. The volatiles absorbed by SPME were analyzed using GC-MS. Column: SUPELCOWAXTM 10 column, 30 m × 0.25 mm, film thickness 0.25 μm, Supelco Inc. The carrier gas was helium (flow rate, 1.0 mL/min). The injection port temperature was 230 °C and operated in splitless mode. The splitless time was 1 min. The initial temperature of the oven was 60 °C and kept for 3 min, then programmed to 240 °C at 10 °C/min, and held at 240 °C for 10 min. Full scan mode was applied with a mass range of m/z 40–200. The experiments were performed in three replicates.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Volatile Profiling of Tea Leaves

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Tea leaves (containing one bud and three leaves) were placed in one of the following solutions: (1) water (as control); (2) 12 mM l a,b,b,2,3,4,5,6-2H8]Phe (l-[2H8]Phe, deuterium atom ≥ 98%, Cambridge Isotope Laboratories, Inc.). After 18 h treatment, to identify endogenous volatile products, finely powdered floral tissues (500 mg fresh weight) were extracted with 2 mL of hexane:ethyl acetate (1:1) for 7 h in the dark. The extract was then filtered through a short plug of anhydrous sodium sulfate and 1 μL of the filtrate was subjected to GC-MS analysis. The injector temperature was 230 °C, splitless mode was used with a splitless time of 1 min, and helium was the carrier gas with a velocity 1.6 mL/min. The SUPELCOWAXTM 10 column (Supelco Inc., 30 m × 0.25 mm × 0.25 μm) was used with an initial temperature of 60 °C, a ramp of 20 °C/min to 180 °C, and then 10 °C/min to 240 °C, and hold at 240 °C for 20 min. The MS analyses were carried out in full scan mode (mass range m/z 44–200).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Headspace SPME-GC-MS Analysis of Urine Volatiles

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The sample preparation and analysis were previously described in detail [59 ]. Briefly, each urine sample was run in triplicate; three 1 mL aliquots were pipetted into 10 mL clean glass headspace vials along with ACS grade sodium chloride to saturation, and 153 ng of naphthalene-d8 as an internal standard for normalizing peak areas between samples.
Samples were analyzed by headspace solid-phase microextraction (SPME) on a 7890A-5975C gas chromatograph-mass spectrometer (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA) fitted with a CombiPAL robotic sampling preparation and injection system (Autosampler Guys, Alexandria, VA). The CombiPAL heated and agitated the sample at 37°C for 30 min to equilibrate the sample with the headspace, then for 45 min to equilibrate the headspace with a 1 cm 50/30 μm divinyl benzene-carboxen-poly(dimethylsiloxane) (DVB/CAR/PDMS) stable-flex SPME fiber (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO). The SPME fiber and column were heated to the maximum temperature between samples to prevent carry-over. The instrument and autosampler system were controlled using MSD Chemstation software ver E.02.02 (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA). Chromatographic separation was obtained with a 0.25 mm ID by 30 m long SUPELCOWAX 10 column with a 0.25 μm film (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO). The mass spectrometer operated in the full scan mode with a range from 40 to 350 m/z.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Extraction and Analysis of Volatile Compounds

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Volatile compounds from kernel and oil were extracted by solid-phase microextraction (SPME) [13 (link)]. Briefly, 3.0 g of grounded kernel flour or extracted oil was mixed with 2.5 mg/kg of 4-methyl-2-pentanol (internal standard), stirred for 10 min at 40 °C until equilibration in a 20 mL glass vial with a PTFE/silicone septum (Agilent Technologies, Palo alto, CA, USA). Next, a solid phase microextraction (SPME) fiber (DVB/CAR/PDMS, Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) was exposed to the sample headspace for 40 min. Next, the volatile compounds were analyzed with a GC system (Agilent Technologies) comprising an autosampler (Agilent PAL RSI 85), gas chromatograph (GC Agilent 7820A) and mass spectrometer (Agilent 5977B) designed with an electron impact source and quadrupole analyzer. Volatile compounds were separated with a Supelcowax 10 column (30 m × 0.25 mm × 0.25 µm, Sigma-Aldrich, USA) using helium as a carrier gas at a flow rate of 1 mL/min. GC oven temperature was started at 40 °C and increased by 3 °C/min after 10 min, until it reached a final temperature of 200 °C. Volatiles were identified by two methods, including the use of NIST 08 Mass Spectral Library and comparison of their retention time and mass spectrum to their respective standards. Results were expressed as µg of internal standard per kg of kernel or oil sample.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Fatty Acid Profiling of PFOS-Exposed Zebrafish

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Lipids were extracted from zebrafish samples according to the Folch method (Folch et al., 1957 ) and submitted to transmethylation of the fatty acids using hydrogen chloride in methanol, according to Park’s method with slight modifications (Park et al., 2001 (link)). Total larval concentrations fatty acid species were each quantified on pooled samples of 20 larvae (4 dpf) exposed to 0 (DMSO), 16, or 32 μM PFOS. Samples were sonicated using a Branson SFX250 Sonifier equipped with a microtip extender and homogenates extracted chloroform/methanol mixture (2:1). Fatty acid methyl esters (FAMEs) were prepared by 3N methanolic hydrogen chloride. FAMEs were analyzed on GC–MS-QP2010 SE (Shimadzu, Japan) using a SUPELCOWAX™ 10 column (100 m Å~ 0.25 mm i.d., 0.25 μm film thickness, Sigma Aldrich, USA). Helium was used as the carrier gas (inlet pressure, 210 kPa). The column oven temperature started at 50°C, increased to 200°C at 20°C/min and then to 220°C at 2°C/min and finally held at 220°C for 162.50 min. The injector and the detector were maintained at 250°C. The fatty acids were identified by comparison of their retention times with the standards and confirmed by searching the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) mass spectrum library. Data were collected from 4–5 replicates and reported as a percentage of the total fatty acids.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Fatty Acid Profiling by GC-MS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Fatty acids were isolated and methylated using a modified Folch method as previously described [4 (link),26 (link)]. Fatty acid in plasma samples were quantified by gas chromatography–mass spectroscopy (GC-MS) with a Supelcowax-10 column (Sigma-Aldrich, Saint Luis, MO, USA). Peak identification was based upon comparison of both retention time and mass spectra of the unknown peak to that of known standards. Fatty acid methylated ester (FAME) mass was determined by comparing areas of unknown FAMEs to that of a fixed concentration of 17:0 internal standard. Response factors were determined for each individual FAME to correct for GC-MS total ion chromatogram discrepancies in quantification. These factors were determined through the use of a GLC reference standard which contained known masses of FAMEs ranging from 14–24 °C. The response ratio of each FAME is corrected to a fixed amount ratio for each FAME relative to 17:0. Individual FA is expressed as a percent of the total FA mass (mol%).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Quantitative Analysis of Fatty Acids by GC-MS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Fatty acids were isolated and methylated using a modified Folch method as described previously.2 (link),13 (link) Samples were quantified by gas chromatography–mass spectroscopy (GC-MS) with a Supelcowax-10 column (Sigma-Aldrich). Peak identification was based upon comparison of both retention time and mass spectra of the unknown peak to that of known standards. Fatty acid methylated ester (FAME) mass was determined by comparing areas of unknown FAMEs to that of a fixed concentration of 17:0 internal standard. Response factors were determined for each individual FAME to correct for GC-MS total ion chromatogram discrepancies in quantification. These factors were determined through the use of a GLC reference standard which contained known masses of FAMEs ranging from 14–24°C. The response ratio of each FAME is corrected to a fixed amount ratio for each FAME relative to 17:0. Individual FA is expressed as a percent of the total FA mass (mol%).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Fatty Acid Profile Determination Procedure

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The fatty acids profile was determined by following the standard UNE55,037-73. The samples were analyzed in a GC 8000Top (CE Instruments Ltd.), which was equipped with a flame ionization detector (FID); the samples were injected into a Supelcowax 10 column (30 mm × 0.25 mm) (Sigma-Aldrich). Helium was the carrier gas at a flow of 1 mL/min. The temperatures of the injector and detector were fixed at 250 °C and 270 °C, respectively; an injection volume of 1 µL was used for sample analysis. The oven temperature was programmed at 120 °C during the first 3 min with an increase of 4 °C/min until 220 °C. The relative percentage of each fatty acid was determined by conducting an internal normalization of the chromatographic peak areas. A standard mixture of fatty acids methyl esters (Supelco37 FAME Mix) was used for identification and calibration purposes.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!