The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Bright field light microscope

Manufactured by Leica
Sourced in Italy

The Bright field light microscope is a core laboratory instrument designed to provide magnified visual inspection of specimens by illuminating them with a bright, even light. It utilizes a combination of lenses to produce a high-resolution image of the sample. The microscope's primary function is to enable detailed observation and analysis of various materials and biological samples.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

6 protocols using bright field light microscope

1

Quantifying Reactive Oxygen Species in Heat-Stressed Arabidopsis and Rice

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
In order to check the amount of reactive oxygen species (ROS) produced in response to HS in transgenic Arabidopsis and WT plants, staining with nitro blue tetrazolium (NBT) was done (Agarwal and Khurana, 2018 (link)). For this, 2-week-old seedlings of Arabidopsis WT and overexpression transgenics were subjected to HS (42°C for 2 h) after which overnight staining of the plants was done by incubating them in NBT (2 mM NBT powder, 20 mM phosphate buffer). The seedlings were washed with water on the next day and subjected to removal of chlorophyll by dipping them in bleaching solution (ethanol, acetic acid, and glycerol in a ratio of 3:1:1). The plants were then visualized under a bright field light microscope (Leica), and pictures were taken for the comparison of ROS in transgenics and the WT Arabidopsis plants after heat stress treatment.
For rice, 1-month-old plants were taken, and a similar protocol was followed for the comparison of ROS in rice WT and overexpression transgenic lines. NBT staining was done after giving them heat stress.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Visualizing ROS Levels in Arabidopsis and Rice

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For vizualization the ROS levels in TaOBF1-5B Arabidopsis overexpression lines and WT, staining with nitro blue tetrazolium (NBT) was done (Meena et al., 2020 (link); Samtani et al., 2022 (link)). The seeds were germinated on half strength MS medium and then 1- and 2-week-old plants were subjected to 42°C for 2 h, after which the overnight staining of the seedlings was done with NBT (2 mM NBT powder, 20 mM phosphate buffer). The seedlings were washed with water and subjected to chlorophyll removal by dipping them in a bleaching solution (ethanol, acetic acid, and glycerol in a ratio of 3:1:1). The seedlings were then visualized under a bright field light microscope (Leica, Germany) and pictures were taken for comparison of ROS in transgenics and the wild-type plants.
Similarly, NBT staining was done in TaOBF1-5B rice overexpression lines and the WT plants after heat stress for analyzing the ROS levels. For this, 15-day-old seedlings grown hydroponically were subjected to 42°C for 24 h and then allowed to recover for 24 h after which the staining was done overnight as described above.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Quantitative Pulmonary Tumor Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Images were captured in a blinded fashion using a brightfield light microscope and mounted camera (Leica, London, UK). Primary antibody binding was assessed by quantification of positive staining using Image J (NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA) as described [9 (link),24 (link),25 (link),26 (link)]. Pulmonary tumor burden was assessed as described [23 (link)]. Tumor burden values are mean number of foci per lung cross section and mean % of lung cross sectional area containing foci. Immunostaining values are mean % of tumor area covered by positive staining. Pulmonary tumor vascularisation was assessed using a Chalkley reticule as described [27 (link)]. Values are mean number of tumor vessels.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Histological Characterization of Undecalcified Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The samples were fixed for 72 h in 10% formalin solution, dehydrated in ascending graded alcohols and embedded in LR White resin (Sigma-Aldrich) (Pizzicannella et al., 2011 (link)). Following polymerization, undecalcified oriented cut sections of 50 μm were obtained and ground down to about 30 μm by using the TT System (TMA2, Grottammare, Italy). The sections were analyzed with the CLSM LSM510 META (Zeiss) and, after staining with a solution of acid fuchsine and methylene blue, they were observed at light microscopy. The investigation was carried out by means of a bright-field light microscope (Leica Microsystem, Milan, Italy) connected to a high-resolution digital camera DFC425B Leica (Leica Microsystem).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Histological Analysis of Biomaterial Scaffolds

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
In order to perform histological analysis, samples were fixed for 72 h in 10 % formalin solution, dehydrated in ascending graded alcohols and embedded in LR White resin (Sigma-Aldrich) [44 (link)]. After polymerization, undecalcified oriented cut sections of 50 μm were obtained and after ground down to about 30 μm using the TT System (TMA2, Grottammare, Italy). Sections were washed three times with distilled water and placed in silver nitrate solution (1%) under intense light for 3 h. Then, silver nitrate solution was removed and the scaffolds were washed again three times with distilled water. By adding sodium thiosulfate solution (5%) for 5 min, unreacted silver was removed from the scaffolds. Finally, the samples were washed with distilled water and observed by invert microscopy. The investigation was carried out by means of a bright-field light microscope (Leica Microsystem, Milan, Italy) connected to a high-resolution digital camera DFC425B Leica (Leica Microsystem).
In order to evaluate vascularization, the sections were observed under a light microscope after a double-staining procedure with methylene blue and fuchsin acid solutions.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Hematoxylin-Eosin Staining Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Deparaffinized slides were stained in GILL 2 hematoxylin solution for 45 s then thoroughly washed under running tap water to remove any excess dye. Next, slides were dipped twice in 1% acidic alcohol, immersed in 1% lithium carbonate for 25 s, dipped in Eosin Y solution 10 times, then washed under running tap water. Subsequently, sections were dipped in 100% ethanol 10 times twice, then dipped 10 times in 100% xylene twice. Finally, slides were coverslipped using dibutylphthalate polystyrene xylene (DPX) as the mounting medium. Slides were visualized using a brightfield light microscope (Leica microsystems. Inc, Morrisville, NY, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!