The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Dig nick translation mix

Manufactured by Roche
Sourced in Germany, Switzerland, United States

The DIG-Nick Translation Mix is a reagent kit used in molecular biology applications. It provides the necessary components for the labeling of DNA or RNA probes with digoxigenin (DIG) for detection in various hybridization techniques. The kit includes the necessary enzymes, buffers, and other reagents required for the nick translation process, which is a method of incorporating labeled nucleotides into DNA or RNA strands.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

68 protocols using dig nick translation mix

1

Metaphase Chromosome Preparation and FISH

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The preparation of metaphase chromosomes was performed as described (Zhu and Gui 2007 ; Li et al. 2016b ). Six DNA probes were used to perform FISH analysis according to standard procedures as described previously. The BAC-DNAs marking chromosome 5A (Chr5A), Chr5B, Chr17A, and Chr17B (Li et al. 2014 (link); Mou et al. 2021 (link)) were labeled by DIG-Nick Translation Mix and Biotin-Nick Translation Mix (Roche), respectively. To investigate the sex determination system of the novel amphitriploids and its offspring, the fragments specific to sex chromosomes (Chr22B) were amplified by PCR and labeled by DIG-Nick Translation Mix (Roche, Switzerland) (Lu et al. 2021 (link)), and the genomic DNA of C. auratus labeled by Biotin-Nick Labeling System were used to distinguish X and Y chromosomes. The chromosomes were stained with DAPI (Sigma, USA). The sections were observed and photographed by Zeiss Axio Imager2 (Analytical & Testing Center, IHB, CAS).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Wheat rDNA and Melon Centromere Probes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Wheat 45S ribosomal DNA (rDNA; pTa71) and melon centromere satellite DNA (Cmcent) were used as the probes [18 (link), 19 (link)]. The Cmcent probe was labeled with the dig-nick translation mix (Roche) or biotin-nick translation mix (Roche), while the 45S rDNA probe was labeled with the dig-nick translation mix (Roche).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

RNA FISH Visualization of Nuclear Protein Localization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
RNA FISH was performed with digoxigenin-labeled probes as described [36 (link),53 (link),77 (link)]. BAC DNA probes used for this study were: Scml2, RP24-204O18 (CHORI BACPAC library) and Zfx, bMQ-372M23 (Mouse bMQ BAC library). BAC-containing bacteria were grown in LB-chloramphenicol culture overnight at 37°C. A standard miniprep method was used to isolate BAC DNA. Approximately 2 μg of BAC DNA was labelled using DIG-Nick Translation Mix (Roche) and precipitated with Cot-1 DNA (Invitrogen) and salmon sperm DNA (Stratagene). Frozen testis cells were permeabilized with CSK buffer (100 mM NaCl, 300 mM sucrose, 3 mM MgCl2, 10 mM PIPES, 0.5% Triton X-100, 2 mM vanadyl ribonucleoside (New England Biolabs)), fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde, and dehydrated through an ice-cold ethanol series. DNA-BAC probes were denatured at 80°C, pre-hybridized at 37°C, and incubated with the sample overnight at 37°C. After stringency washes, digoxigenin was detected with anti-digoxigenin-FITC (1:10, Millipore). RNA FISH slides were then stained for immunofluorescence with anti-TOPBP1 (1:50, Abcam) and anti-γH2AX (1:100, Millipore). Samples were analyzed on an Olympus IX70 inverted microscope and computer-assisted (DeltaVision) CCD camera (Photometrics) was used to capture images (processed with ImageJ and Photoshop software).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Comparative Analysis of Erythrinidae gDNA

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The gDNA of H. odoe was used for comparative analyzes with the gDNAs of several Erythrinidae species, namely E. erythrinus (karyomorph D), Hoplias lacerdae, H. malabaricus (karyomorph A) and Hoplerythrinus unitaeniatus (karyomorph D). The gDNA of H. odoe was labeled with biotin-16-dUTP using BIO-nick-translation Mix (Roche), while the male-derived gDNAs of E. erythrinus, H. malabaricus, H. unitaeniatus, and H. lacerdae were labeled with digoxigenin-11-dUTP using DIG-nick-translation Mix (Roche, Manheim, Germany). In all experiments it was utilized C0t-1 DNA (i.e., fraction of genomic DNA enriched for highly and moderately repetitive sequences), prepared according to Zwick et al. (1997) (link), for blocking common genomic repetitive sequences. The final probe was composed of 500 ng of H. odoe gDNA plus 500 ng of the corresponding gDNA for each Erythrinidae species. The probe was ethanol-precipitated and the dry pellet dissolved in a hybridization buffer (20 μL per slide) containing 50% formamide + 2x SSC + 10% SDS+ 10% dextran sulfate and Denhardt’s buffer, pH 7.0).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Quantitative Analysis of Nuclear Organization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
IF and DNA-FISH were carried out as in Jacinto et al. (2015) (link). BACs are described in Supplemental Table S1 and were processed using the DIG-Nick translation mix (Roche). Probes and genomic DNA were denatured simultaneously for 3 min at 80°C. The antibodies used were anti-Lamin A (Sigma), anti-Nup153 (SA1 mouse ascites from Dr. B. Burke), and anti-DIG (Roche). Images were acquired in a Carl Zeiss 710 confocal microscope. For the three-zone scoring, we determined the relative radial positions of FISH spots by calculating the euclidean distance of the FISH spot to the nuclear periphery in the middle plane of the nucleus binned into three concentric zones of equivalent area. Measurements were carried out using Imaris software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Comprehensive Microsatellite FISH Probes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Oligonucleotide probes containing microsatellite sequences (CA)15, (CAA)10, (CAC)10, (CAG)10, (CAT)10, (CGG)10, (GA)15, (GAA)10 and (TA)15 were directly labeled with Cy5 during synthesis by Sigma (St. Louis, MO, USA), as described by Kubat and colleagues [22] (link). The retrotransposable elements Rex 1, 3 and 6 were obtained by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) [23] (link). The 18S rDNA probe, corresponding to a 1,400-bp segment of the 18S rRNA gene, was obtained via PCR from the nuclear DNA according to Cioffi and colleagues [24] (link). All probes were labeled with DIG-11-dUTP using DIG-Nick-translation Mix (Roche, Mannheim, Germany) and were used for the fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) experiments.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

ACE Detection via FISH Fluorescent Probes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) experiments were performed with a standard protocol. The pPur (Clontech, 631601) plasmid was labeled with FITC fluorescent dye and used as a probe for ACE detection. We used the Roche DIG Nick Translation Mix (1745816) or the Roche Biotin Nick Translation Mix (1745824) for labeling DNA probes.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Cytogenetic Analysis of C. hoffmanni

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The GTG- and CBG-banding of C. hoffmanni chromosomes were performed according to Seabright67 (link) and Sumner68 (link), respectively. FISH was performed using the cloned satDNA sequences as probes after they were labeled by nick-translation with digoxigenin-11-dUTP (DIG-Nick Translation mix, Roche Applied Science) for SATCHO1 and biotin-16-dUTP (Biotin-Nick Translation mix, Roche Applied Science) for SATCHO2. The probes (~ 150 ng in 50% formamide/2xSSC) were denatured for 10 min at 98 °C. Chromosomes were dehydrated in ethanol series (70%, 90%, 100%) and denatured in 70% formamide/2xSSC for 2 min at 75 °C. The hybridization was performed overnight at 37 °C. Post-hybridization washes comprised two 5 min incubations in 2xSSC at 45 °C. Immunodetection was performed with anti-digoxigenin conjugated with rhodamine (Roche Applied Science) for SATCHO1 and avidin conjugated with FITC (Roche Applied Science) for SATCHO2. Chromosomes were counterstained with DAPI 1:500 in Slowfade (Invitrogen). The analysis was performed under a Zeiss Axioimager 2 epifluorescence microscope adapted with a CCD camera and image acquisition was performed with the AxioVision (Zeiss) software (Carl Zeiss MicroImaging, Jena, Germany).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Drosophila Neuroblast Chromosome Preparation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Larval neuroblast chromosomes from Oregon R were prepared as described previously58 (link). Chromosomes were counterstained with 4′,6-diamino-2-phenylindole (DAPI). The dodeca satellite oligo probe 5′-CCCGTACTGGTCCCGTACTGGTCCCGTACTCGGTCCCGTACTCGGT-3′ and the 10 bp satellite oligo probe 5′-AATAACATAGAATAACATAGAATAACATAGAATAACATAGAATAACATAG-3′ were chemically synthesized and labeled at the 5′ end with Cy3 or at the 3′ end with fluorescein (New England Biolabs). DNA probes derived from clones or PCR products were labeled by nick translation with digoxygenin-11-dUTP (Roche) using the DIG-Nick Translation Mix (Roche). Digoxygenin labeled probes were detected with Anti-Digoxigenin-Rhodamine, Fab fragments (Roche) in a 1:200 dilution, following supplier recommendations. Digital images were obtained using a Zeiss Axiover 200 microscope equipped with a cooled Charge-Coupled Device camera. The fluorescent signals were recorded separately as grey-scale digital images and then pseudo-colored and merged using Adobe Photoshop software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Fluorescent In Situ Hybridization of HeT-A Transposable Elements

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For probe preparation, a mixture of the 2-kb ApaI fragment of the 3′-untranslated region and the 23Zn-1 fragment containing ORF1+ORF2 of HeT-A39 (link)40 (link) was labelled with digoxigenin-11-dUTP (DIG-Nick Translation Mix, Roche) following the manufacturer's instructions. Three micrograms of sonicated salmon sperm DNA and 80 ng of labelled probe per slide were ethanol precipitated and resuspended in 50% formamide, 10% dextran sulfate and 2 × SSC. Chromosome preparations were dehydrated by sequential immersion in 70%, 90% and absolute ethanol, and then denaturated 2 min at 70 °C in 70% formamide and 2 × SSC. After sequential immersion in cold 70%, 90% and absolute ethanol, slides were incubated with 10 μl of probe at 37 °C in wet chamber. After overnight incubation, slides were whashed three times at 42 °C with 50% formamide and 2 × SSC, followed by three whashes at 60 °C in 0.1 × SSC. Chromosomes preparations were blocked 30 min at 37 °C in 3% BSA, 0.1% Tween 20 and 4 × SSC, and then incubated with 1:50 anti-digoxigenin (Roche 11207750910) dilution in 0.1% BSA, 0.1% Tween-20 and 4 × SSC for 30 min at 37 °C. After three washes at 42 °C in 4 × SSC and 0.1% Tween-20, slides were air dried, mounted in Vectashield medium H-1200 with DAPI and analysed using a Zeiss Axioplan epifluorescence microscope equipped with a cooled CCD camera (Photometrics).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!