The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Spss software package version 20

Manufactured by IBM
Sourced in United States

SPSS is a software package developed by IBM for statistical analysis. Version 20.0 features tools for data management, advanced statistics, and visualization. The core function of SPSS is to provide users with a comprehensive set of analytical capabilities to explore and understand data.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

283 protocols using spss software package version 20

1

Statistical Analysis of Collected Data

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
IBM SPSS software package version 20.0 was used for analysis of the collected data. Mean ± standard deviation (SD) was used to express the quantitative data. Frequency and percentage were used to express the qualitative data. When comparing between two means, the independent-samples t-test of significance was used. In order to compare proportions between two qualitative parameters, chi-square (χ2) test of significance was used.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Statistical Analysis of Experimental Data

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Data were fed to the computer and analysed using IBM SPSS software package version 20.0. (Armonk, NY: IBM Corp.). Shapiro–Wilk test was used to verify the normality of distribution of variables; comparisons between groups for categorical variables were assessed using χ2 test (Monte Carlo). Marginal homogeneity test was used to analyse the significance between the different stages. Mann–Whitney test was applied to compare between two groups for not normally distributed quantitative variables. Wilcoxon signed ranks test assessed for comparison between two periods for not normally distributed quantitative variables. ANOVA was used for comparing different categories. Kruskal–Wallis test was used to compare different categories for abnormally distributed quantitative variables. Pearson coefficient was used to correlate between two normally distributed quantitative variables. Significance of the obtained results was judged at the 5% level [67 , 68 ].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Comparison of Bacterial Counts in Oral Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Data were fed to the computer and analyzed using the IBM SPSS software package version 20.0. Quantitative data were described using range (minimum and maximum), mean, and standard deviation. A bar chart was used to graphically describe the data. The distributions of the quantitative variables were tested for normality using the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test. It revealed that the data were normally distributed, and the parametric test was applied. A comparison between two independent populations was done using an independent t test; also, the paired t test is used to analyze two paired data. Bacterial counts were transformed to log10 (CFU/mL). The paired t test was used to compare between the two groups in log S. mutans counts and to study the changes by time in each group. The level of statistical significance was set at p ≤ 0.05.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Comparison of Nutritional Data Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Data were fed to the computer and analyzed using IBM SPSS software package version 20.0. (Armonk, NY: IBM Corp). For continuous data, they were tested for normality by the Shapiro–Wilk test. Quantitative data were expressed as a range (minimum and maximum), mean, and standard deviation for normally distributed quantitative variables Paired t-test was used to compare nutritional facts per serving and laboratory nutritional facts per serving. On the other hand, for not normally distributed quantitative variables, Wilcoxon signed ranks test was used to compare nutritional facts per serving and laboratory nutritional facts per serving. The significance of the obtained results was judged at the 5% level24 ,25 (link).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Assessing Mediation of Sexual Dysfunction

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Data were fed to the computer and analyzed using IBM SPSS software package version 20.0. (IBM; Armonk, NY). The Kolmogorov- Smirnov test was used to verify the normality of distribution of variables, Comparisons between the 2 periods for categorical variables were assessed using McNemar test, while Wilcoxon signed ranks test was assessed for comparison between 2 periods for abnormally distributed quantitative variables. Significance of the obtained results was judged at the 5% level.
Possible mediation by sexual dysfunction on the association between anxiety/depression and sexual satisfaction was examined. The Preacher and Hayes method23 (link) was used to test the magnitude and significance of mediation.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Statistical Analysis of Categorical Data

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Data were analyzed using IBM SPSS software package version 20.0. Qualitative data were described using number and percentage. Comparison between different groups regarding categorical variables was tested using Chi-square test. When more than 20% of the cells have expected count less than five, correction for Chi-square was conducted using Monte Carlo correction. Significance of the obtained results was judged at the 5% level (11 ).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Statistical Analysis of Qualitative and Quantitative Data

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Qualitative data were described using number and percent. Quantitative data were described using range (minimum and maximum), mean, standard deviation, median, and interquartile range (IQR). The significance level of p value was set at 0.05. Chi-squared test and Fisher’s exact (Monte Carlo correction) were applied to assess data between different groups.
Statistical analysis was performed using IBM SPSS software package version 20.0. (Armonk, NY: IBM Corp).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Statistical Analysis of Experimental Data

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Data were fed to the computer and analyzed using IBM SPSS software package version 20.0. (IBM Corp). Significance of obtained results was judged at 5% level.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Renal Masses Characterization Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Data were analyzed using IBM SPSS software package version 20.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Qualitative data were described using numbers and percentages. Correlations were calculated using an independent-sample t-test, chi-squared test, and Fisher exact test. P value < of 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of the “angular interface” sign to differentiate benign from malignant lesions were evaluated. A multivariate logistic regression model including patient’s age, mass side and site, maximal dimension, contrast enhancement, presence of angular interface sign, and presence of intralesional fat was used to evaluate for the features associated with the likelihood of benign versus malignant renal masses.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Statistical Analysis of Research Data

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Data were fed to the computer and analyzed using IBM SPSS software package version 20.0. (Armonk, NY: IBM Corp). The Kolmogorov- Smirnov was used to verify the normality of distribution of variables. ANOVA was used for comparing the different studied groups and followed by Post Hoc test (Tukey) for pairwise comparison. Kaplan-Meier Survival curve was used for overall survival. Comparisons between groups for categorical variables were assessed using Chi-square test (Fisher’s Exact or Monte Carlo correction). Significance of the obtained results was judged at the 5% level [30 ].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!