The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Dsc 1 star system

Manufactured by Mettler Toledo
Sourced in Switzerland, United States, United Kingdom

The DSC 1 Star System is a differential scanning calorimeter (DSC) designed for thermal analysis. It measures the heat flow associated with physical and chemical changes in materials as a function of temperature and time. The DSC 1 Star System provides accurate and precise thermal data for a wide range of applications, including polymer characterization, phase transitions, and reaction kinetics.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

38 protocols using dsc 1 star system

1

Thermal Analysis of Bacterial Cellulose

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The thermal property of BC was analyzed using a differential scanning calorimeter (DSC 1 STAR System Mettler ToledoTM, Columbus, OH, USA). Approximately 5–10 mg of dried BC was heated from 20 to 500 °C with a heating rate of 10 °C/min. The empty aluminum pan was used as a reference [39 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Thermoporometry Characterization of Mesopores

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The presence of mesopores in MC sample was evidenced by thermoporometry using DSC 1 Star System (Mettler Toledo, Columbus, OH, USA), with demineralized water as a liquid probe. Based on preliminary experiments, the mass ratio 1:2 of sample-to-water was chosen. Five mg of sample was placed in an aluminium pan, gently compressed, and then 10 μL of demineralized water was added. The pan was hermetically sealed and left to stabilize at room temperature for 1 h before analysis. The procedure of pre-freezing (to ensure a complete freezing of the liquid present in the pores) was according to the following program: cooling to −90 °C (5 °C/min), heating to −0.3 °C (5 °C/min), 10 min at −0.3 °C, cooling to −90 °C (5 °C/min), 5 min at −90 °C. The thermoporometry measurement was then performed by heating to 25 °C, with a heating rate of 5 °C/min. The baseline of DSC melting peak of water in pores and onset temperature of a bulk water melting peak were determined for the differential pore size distribution (PSD) calculations. The pore volume was calculated by integration of the PSD in the given range of pore sizes. Additional information can be found in Ref. [7 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Thermal Properties of Gelatin and GelMA

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The thermal properties of gelatin and GelMA suspensions, namely the gelation temperature (Tgel) and changes in gelation enthalpy (ΔHgel), were assessed by differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) (DSC 1 STAR System, Mettler-Toledo, Greinfensee, Switzerland) using an intracooler TC100 (HUBER, Raleigh, NC, USA). The measurements were carried out by loading ~70 mg of each suspension (10% and 20% w/v) into a stainless-steel pan (120 µL). An empty pan was used as a reference and gas N2 was used as purge gas. The thermal cycle included cooling from 20 to −15 °C at 3 °C/min, an isotherm step at −15 °C for 5 min, heating up to 80 °C at 10 °C/min and an isotherm step at 80 °C for 5 min. The samples were subjected to the same thermal protocol twice to erase the material’s thermal history. Tgel and ∆H were determined from cooling scans using STARe Software (DB V12.10, Mettler-Toledo, Greinfensee, Switzerland). Prior to the measurements, the temperature and enthalpy were calibrated at a heating rate of 10 °C/min using indium as standard (Tm = 156.6 °C and ΔHm = 28.55 J/g).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Differential Scanning Calorimetry of Scaffolds

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A differential scanning calorimeter (DSC 1 STAR System, Mettler Toledo, Greifensee, Switzerland) with an intracooler TC100 (Huber, Offenburg, Germany) was used to characterize the scaffolds. The measurements were carried out using ~10 mg of sample in a stainless-steel pan (120 µL). An empty pan was used as a reference. The thermal scanning protocol used was: cooling down from 25 to 0 °C at 40 °C/min, isothermic step at 0 °C for 5 min, and heating to 150 °C at 10 °C/min. The samples were subjected to the same thermal protocol twice. The melting temperature (Tm) and changes in the enthalpy of melting (∆Hm) were determined from the first scan. The glass transition temperature (Tg) was determined in the amorphous material (second scan). The curves were analyzed using the STARe software (DB V 12.10). Prior to the measurements, the melting temperature and enthalpy values were calibrated using indium as standard. All determinations were made in triplicate.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Calorimetric Analysis of [BMIM][BETI] Ionic Liquid

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Calorimetric
experiments of [BMIM][BETI] were performed
by a Mettler Toledo DSC1STAR system equipped with a liquid nitrogen
cooling accessory and an HSS8 ceramic sensor (a heat flux sensor with
120 thermocouples). The sample was contained in aluminum crucibles
with a 40 μL volume. Prior to the measurement, the sample was
annealed 15 min at 373 K, followed by heating from 143 to 373 K at
rate 10 K min–1. During the experiments, a flow
of nitrogen was maintained at 60 mL min–1. Enthalpy
and temperature calibrations were performed using indium and zinc
standards. Calorimetric experiments of TPIL were reported in ref (19 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Calorimetric Analysis of Ionic Liquids

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Calorimetric experiments of studied ILs were performed by means of a Mettler Toledo DSC1STAR System equipped with a liquid nitrogen cooling accessory and an HSS8 ceramic sensor (a heat flux sensor with 120 thermocouples). Each sample with a mass of around 10–20 mg was measured in aluminum crucibles with a 40 μL volume. During the experiments, the flow of nitrogen was kept at 60 mL min–1. Enthalpy and temperature calibrations were performed using indium and zinc standards. Low-temperature verification was made using CCl4 and n-heptane (182.15 K, 140.5 J g−1) at different scanning rates (0.7, 1, 5, and 10 K min−1). The baseline was constructed as a straight line from the onset to the endpoint. A dedicated software Mettler Toledo DSC1STAR allows various calculations (onset, heat, peak temperature, etc.) from the original recorded DSC curves. Prior to the measurement, the samples were annealed 30 min at 373 K. Temperature ramps involved cooling to 143 K and then heating to 373 K with a rate of 10 K per min. Samples were cycled at least 3 times to ensure reproducibility and high accuracy. The 6-h aging experiment was performed at 183 K after cooling with the rate of 10 K min−1.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Thermal Properties of Ecoflex Homopolymer

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The thermal properties of non-incubated samples were investigated by DSC in the Mettler Toledo DSC1 STAR system. The measurements were performed under a nitrogen atmosphere (50 cm3·min−1). The temperature ramp was set from 20 to 200 °C (10 K·min−1), followed by annealing at 200 °C for 5 min, subsequently followed by a cooling scan from 200 to 20 °C (20 K·min−1), then an isothermal step at 0 °C for 5 min, and finally a second heating scan from 0 to 200 °C (10 K·min−1). The melting point temperature (Tm) as well as the heat of fusion (ΔHm) were measured during the first heating cycle.
The degree of crystallinity χc was calculated according to the following equation (Equation (1):
where 〖ΔH〗_m is the heat of fusion and 〖ΔH〗_m^0 is the tabulated heat of fusion for theoretically 100% crystalline Ecoflex homopolymer (115 J g−1) [53 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Determining Glass Transition Temperature by DSC

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Glass transition temperature (Tg) was determined by differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) with a Mettler-Toledo DSC1 Star System under a nitrogen atmosphere. The instrument was calibrated using Indium melting temperature and enthalpy, and corrected for empty cell baseline. About 10–15 mg in mass was extracted from a thin film of each sample by cutting a disk of ~3 mm in diameter and encapsulated into 40 μL Al pan. The experiments were conducted by performing two heating and one cooling ramp, between −20 °C and 160 °C, at 20 °C/min. The Tg values calculated with the midpoint method for each sample are reported in Table 6, while raw DSC curves are in Figures S2 and S3.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Quantifying Thermal Properties via DSC

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Samples were prepared
by weighing standard 40 μL aluminium pans and lids (Mettler
Toledo, Leicestershire, UK) and adding 20 μL of solution before
hermetically sealing and reweighing in order to quantify the exact
mass of the sample. Each sample was then transferred to a liquid nitrogen-cooled
differential scanning calorimeter (DSC 1 STAR system, Mettler Toledo).
The mass of the aluminium pan and the sample mass was input into the
complimentary STARe thermal analysis software to retain a digital
record and aid the analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Drug-Excipient Compatibility Study

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The study of FT-IR and DSC was used as a means for studying drug-excipients compatibility. In FT-IR study, KBr pellets were prepared with drug and excipients and scanned under Varian FT-IR in the wavelength region of 4000–400 cm−1. Thermal analysis was performed for drug and mixture of drug with excipients using DSC (Mettler DSC 1 star system, Zurich, Switzerland).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!