The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Ase 350 system

Manufactured by Thermo Fisher Scientific
Sourced in United States

The ASE 350 system is a fully automated accelerated solvent extraction (ASE) instrument designed for the efficient extraction of analytes from a wide range of sample matrices. The system utilizes elevated temperature and pressure to increase the efficiency of the extraction process, allowing for rapid and reproducible results.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

15 protocols using ase 350 system

1

Pressurized Liquid Extraction of Plant Compounds

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Pressurized liquid extraction (PLE) was performed in a Dionex ASE 350 system (Dionex, Sunnyvale, CA, USA) as described elsewhere [34 (link)] with some modifications. The samples consisting of 3.5 g ground plant material were mixed with diatomaceous earth (1:1) and placed in a 34 mL stainless-steel cell (2.9 cm diameter) containing a cellulose filter at the ends to avoid solid particles in the collection vial. The cells were preheated 5 min to ensure that the samples reached thermal equilibrium at 10 MPa pressure and 70 °C or 140 °C temperature before 3 extraction cycles, 5 min each (total time 15 min). Afterwards the cell was purged for 60 s with nitrogen to collect the extract in the collection vial.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Ethanol-Based Accelerated Solvent Extraction for Green Coffee Bioactive Compounds

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Extraction was carried out in an accelerated solvent extractor (ASE, 350 system, Dionex, Sunnyvale, CA, USA) equipped with a controlled unit. To avoid any possible oxidation during the extraction process, the solvent was degassed for 10 min to remove the dissolved oxygen. A total of 20.0 g of green coffee powder was accurately weighed and loaded onto 66 mL stainless-steel extraction cells, and 40.0 mL of ethanol was added. Meanwhile, the furnace was heated to the test temperature, and ethanol was added until the pressure reached 100 bar. After pressurizing the system, the extractor was placed in the furnace with a fixed pressure and temperature, static extraction was conducted at 100 °C for 30 min, and the experimental conditions were adopted based on preliminary tests. The extract was dried under vacuum in a rotary evaporator (Buchi R 210, Switzerland) at 40 °C, and then the obtained GEO was stored at −80 °C for further analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Lipid Extraction and Fractionation from Sediments

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Sediment samples were freeze-dried and powdered with a solvent-clean agate mortar and pestle. Extraction was performed using an accelerated solvent extractor (Dionex ASE 350 system) with dichloromethane (DCM) and methanol (MeOH) (4:1 vol/vol) in 3 cycles at 100 °C (10.3 MPa) with a static time of 5 min102 (link). The resultant total lipid extract (TLE) was dried under a gentle stream of nitrogen and then derivatized via acid methanolysis (0.5 M HCl in methanol [MeOH] diluted with ultra clean water (milli-q water washed 3 times with DCM) before subsequent liquid–liquid isolation into hexane: DCM (4:1 vol/vol)47 (link). Derivatized TLEs were concentrated and chromatographically partitioned into three fractions using deactivated silica gel103 (link) (2% H2O total weight) by elution with hexane (F1), hexane: DCM (1:1 [F2]), and DCM: MeOH (4:1 [F3])47 (link). Polar (F3) fractions were silylated using N,O-bis(trimethylsilyl) trifluoroacetamide (BSTFA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Pressurized Liquid Extraction of PHF

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
PLEx was executed in a Dionex ASE 350 system (Dionex, Sunnyvale, CA, USA) with the powder of PHF obtained as mentioned above. Aliquot of 5.0 g of powder of PHF was mixed with diatomaceous earth (1/1) and placed in a 34 mL stainless–steel cells. The extraction was performed via 3 consecutively applied steps with absolute solvents of increasing polarity, in order to get the maximum possible number and amount of secondary metabolites of various polarities and miscibilities, namely, acetone, ethanol, methanol and their aqueous mixtures with water (1:10, 3:10), and pure water. Extraction time was of 22 min; pressure 10.6 MPa; temperature 75 °C (for acetone, ethanol and methanol) and 135 °C (for water). Organic solvents were removed in a rotary vacuum evaporator at 38 °C, while the residual water was removed in a freeze drying unit. The extracts after solvent evaporation were placed under nitrogen flow for 20 min and stored in dark glass bottles at −80 °C until analyzed.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Extraction of Wild Garlic Leaves

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Wild garlic leaves were collected at Fruska Gora mountain, Serbia. Collected leaves were sorted, washed in water, were frozen at −20 °C, freeze-dried, sealed in bags, and stored in the dark at room temperature in a desiccator. Prior extraction plant material was ground in a kitchen blender (0.325 mm), and moisture content (6.12%) was determined. Wild garlic extract was prepared following the recommended optimal conditions investigated by Tomšik et al. (2017) with slight modification [13 (link)]. The extraction was performed in ASE 350 system Dionex Corporation (Sunnyvale, CA, USA). Powdered wild garlic samples were placed into the extraction cell together with diatomic earth, and extraction was performed with water as solvent at 180 °C/1500 psi for 10 min. The extract was stored at 4 °C until further analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Optimized Ginsenoside Extraction from Wild Ginseng

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Pressurized liquid extraction was performed using an ASE 350 System (Dionex, Sunnyvale, CA, USA) with a stainless-steel extraction cell. Approximately 5 g of cultivated wild ginseng sample was placed into an extraction cell after being uniformly mixed with a similar weight of diatomaceous earth. To prevent the powder from penetrating the extraction bottle, a frit and filter (Dionex) were positioned at the cell’s end. The ASE conditions were as follows: static cycles, 1; solvent flush %, 60 volumes; nitrogen purge, 60 s; and pressure, 1,500 psi. Extraction solvent, temperature, and static time were used as extraction variables for the ASE of ginsenosides. The extract was evaporated to dryness using a rotary evaporator at 50°C, which was freeze-dried.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Rambutan Peel Extraction by ASE

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
An ASE 350 system (Dionex, Sunnyvale, CA, USA) with 100 mL stainless steel vessels was used as the pressurized solvent extractor. Approximately 15 g of dried rambutan peel was placed in an extraction cell. The extraction cells were placed in a carousel and the samples were extracted using one static cycle with 60% flush volume and 180 s purge time. The ASE parameters were set as temperature in the range from 60 to 120 °C, with aqueous ethanol concentration 50 to 90 vol% and extraction time between 10 and 50 min. The obtained extracts were evaporated to dryness using a rotary evaporator (Buchi Rotavapor R-215 Postfach Flawil, Switzerland) under 45 °C and 72 mPa until free of solvent and then stored at ~ −18 °C for further analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Pressurized Liquid Extraction of Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
PLE was run according to the methodology used by Leyva-Jiménez et al. [14 (link)] with a pressurized liquid extractor (ASE™ 350 system, Dionex, Sunnyvale, CA, USA). Briefly, for each extraction, 5 g of sample were mixed with 10 g of sea sand and loaded onto 33 mL stainless-steel extraction cells. After extraction, the extracts obtained were ice-cold to achieve a temperature of 20–25 °C and centrifuged at 17,000× g for 15 min in a centrifuge (Sorvall ST 16 R, Thermo Scientific, Leicestershire, UK). The supernatants were dried under vacuum in a SavantTM SpeedVac Concentrator SC250 EXP (Thermo analysis Scientific, Sunnyvale, CA, USA) and they were stored at −20 °C until further use. Prior to use, the dry extracts were reconstituted with the same extraction solvent mixture to a concentration of 10 mg/mL and filtered with single-use syringe filters (0.20 µm pore size).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Grape Stem Powder Extraction Optimization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The PLE conditions and process applied to the grape stem powder were based on a previous process developed by the research group, where the optimal extraction conditions for obtaining the highest antioxidant capacity and total phenolic content (TPC) values were determined [17 (link)]. Briefly, PLE extractions were carried out in an ASE 350 system from Dionex Corporation (Sunnyvale, CA, USA) equipped with a solvent controller unit. Extraction cells (11 mL of capacity) were filled with a mixture of 1 g of grape stem powder dispersed on 1 g of diatomaceous earth. Ethanol:water (30%) as a solvent, at 120 °C for 10 min, yielded HPE (high polymeric phenolic extract), whereas LPE (low polymeric phenolic extract) was obtained at 100% ethanol, 80 °C, and 6 min extraction time. Each extract was independently recovered in a glass vial, and ethanol was removed at 37 °C by vacuum rotary evaporation (IKA RV 10 control, IKA, Staufen, Germany). Next, the extracts were freeze-dried (Telstar Lyobeta 15 equipment; Telstar, Madrid, Spain) and stored at −20 °C in darkness until further analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Accelerated Solvent Extraction Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Sample extraction was carried out using a Dionex™ ASE™ 350 system equipped with 22-mL stainless steel extraction cells under the following conditions: 120 °C, 5 min static extraction, 3 extraction cycles, 100% flush volume, and 60 s nitrogen purge. To reduce the risk of contamination, high purity solvents were used. During the method development, different solvents and solvent combinations were tested. The solvent volume used for the extraction resulted in approximately 50 mL under the specified conditions. More information on the solvents can be found in the respective sections below. In addition, the extraction cells, sand, and GFFs were pre-cleaned using the PLE system with acetone under the following conditions: 100 °C, 1 min static extraction, 3 extraction cycles, 100% flush volume, and 60 s nitrogen purge.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!