The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

8 protocols using anti kdel

1

Protein Immunoblotting of ER Stress Markers

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Protein, 20–30 µg, was separated by electrophoresis on 10–12% SDS-polyacrylamide gels at 60–100 mV and then transferred onto polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) membranes for 90 min on constant 200 mA at 4 °C. After protein transfer, membranes were blocked in 5% BSA + Tris-buffered saline plus Tween-20 (TBST) blocking buffer for an hour, then incubated with the respective primary antibodies overnight at 4 °C. Following 3 washes with TBST, the membranes were incubated with horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-conjugated anti-rabbit IgG (Promega,#W401B, Madison, WI, USA) or HRP-conjugated anti-mouse IgG secondary antibodies (BioRad, #170-6516, Mississauga, ON, Canada) (1:5000) for 1 h at room temperature. Signals were detected using ECL plus kit reagents (Perkin Elmer, Guelph, ON, Canada) on a Chem Doc imager (BioRad, Mississauga, ON, Canada). Primary antibodies used were: Anti-Caspase-12 (Abcam, #ab62484, Toronto, ON, Canada); Anti-KDEL (Abcam, #ab176333, Toronto, ON, Canada), which recognizes GRP94, GRP78, and PDI; Anti-XBP1(Abcam, #ab37152, Toronto, ON, Canada); Anti-ATF6 (Proteintech, #24169-1-AP, Rosemont, IL, USA); Anti-PERK (Proteintech, #20582-1-AP, Rosemont, IL, USA); Anti-IRE1α (Proteintech, #27582-1-AP, Rosemont, IL, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Fluorescent Imaging of Organelle Distribution

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
We used the following antibodies: anti-TOMM20 (Abcam, USA, cat. ab56783); anti-GM-130 (Abcam, USA, cat. ab52649); anti KDEL (Abcam, USA, cat. ab12223). Control and treated macrophages seeded on chamber slides (0.4 × 106/slide) were fixed in 4% formaldehyde in PBS with 0.05% Triton X-100. After washing in PBS–Tween 20, fixed cells were blocked in casein blocking buffer (Bio-Rad, USA) with 0.05% Tween 20 and subsequently incubated in blocking buffer with a 1:200 dilution of primary antibodies and rhodamine–phalloidin overnight at 4 °C. Subsequently, after extensive washing in PBS–Tween 20, cells were mounted in ProLong® Diamond Antifade with DAPI and observed under a Nikon fluorescence microscope. All experiments were performed in triplicate. The difference in organelle distribution between untreated and treated cells was calculated using the fluorescent area (normalized to total cell area using actin fluorescence) and corrected total cell fluorescence of individual cells using the image-processing ImageJ program.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Antibody Validation for ER Stress

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All chemicals were from Sigma–Aldrich. Anti-IRE1α (phospho S724), anti-IRE1α, anti-ATF6, anti-KDEL and anti-HSP40 were from Abcam (Cambridge, UK). Anti-HSP90 and anti-HSP70 were from Enzo Life Science (Exeter, UK). Anti-GRP78 was from Transduction Laboratories (BD Biosciences, Oxford, UK), and anti-β-actin was from Sigma–Aldrich. Other antibodies were purchased from Cell Signalling Technology (New England BioLabs, Hitchin, UK).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

ER Stress Response Protein Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were washed in ice-cold PBS and lysed in TNT buffer (50 mM Tris [pH 7.5], 150 mM NaCl, 10% glycerol and 1% Triton X-100) with protease inhibitor cocktail (Nacalai Tesque), phosphatase inhibitor cocktail (Biotool) and 10 μM MG132 (Enzo Life). Immunoblot analysis was performed as previously described using Blocking One (Nacalai Tesque) or Blocking One-P (Nacalai Tesque) and WesternSure ECL Substrate (Li-Cor Biosciences). Protein was visualised using Ez-Capture II (ATTO Corp), and the band intensities were quantified using Image Studio software (Li-Cor Biosciences). The antibodies for immunoblotting were as follows: anti-phospho-Ser51-eIF2α (Cell Signaling Technology), anti-phospho-Ser51-Perk (Cell Signaling Technology), anti-ATF4 (Sigma Aldrich), anti-KDEL (Abcam), anti-β-actin (Abcam) and anti-COL2A1 (Rockland). Anti-Chop and anti-Xbp1 were kindly gifted by Dr. David Ron (Cambridge Institute for Medical Research).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Immunofluorescent Labeling of Retinal Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Retinal sections were deparaffinised, blocked by 5% (vol./vol.) donkey serum (Sigma-Aldrich) in 1% (vol./vol.) Triton X-100/PBS for 1 h, and incubated overnight at 4°C with the primary antibody (rabbit polyclonal anti-GFAP, 1:1000 and mouse monoclonal anti-KDEL, 1:100; Abcam). Alexa Fluor 555-conjugated anti-rabbit IgG (1:4000) and Alexa Fluor 488-conjugated anti-mouse IgG were used as secondary antibodies (Life Technologies). The nuclei were counterstained with either DAPI (Life Technologies) or propidium iodide (Sigma-Aldrich). Images were captured by a Nikon E800 Epifluoresence microscope.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Generating Ago Overexpression Clones

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To generate ago overexpression clones, hsp70-FLP (BDSC#1929) and UAS-agoUAS.ORF (FlyORF#F001828) were recombined, and hsp70-FLP UAS-ago flies were generated. These flies were crossed with Ay-Gal4,UAS-GFP/CyO (BDSC#4411) and cultured at 18 °C for 5–6 days. Larvae were then shifted to 37 °C for an hour, moved to RT and cultured for 4–5 days. Third instar larvae were then selected and stained by following the conventional staining method described above. The following antibodies were used: Anti-Wg (mouse, 1:100, DSHB), anti-KDEL (rabbit, 1:200, abcam) and anti-GM130 (rabbit, 1:200, abcam).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Immunohistochemistry Assay for Antibody Detection

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Standard immunohistochemistry protocol was used for antibody detection (Rhiner et al., 2010 (link)). For the generation of specific antibodies against Azot, N-terminal peptide MEDISHEERVLILDTFR was used to immunize rabbits. Anti-Wingless (ms, 1:50) was from DSHB, anti-caspase-3 (rabbit, 1:100) was from Cell Signaling Technology, anti-KDEL (rabbit, 1;100) was from Abcam, anti-cytochrome c (mouse, 1:800) was from BD Pharmingen, anti-Hid (rabbit, 1:50) and anti-HA (rat, 1:250) were from Roche, and anti-βGal (mouse, 1:200) was from Promega. TUNEL staining performed as described (Lolo et al., 2012 (link)). Confocal images acquired with Leica SP2 and SP5 microscopes.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Comprehensive Immunoblotting and Imaging Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Anti-GPR30 (1:1000 for Western blot analysis and 1:50 for immunocitochemistry), anti-myogenin (1:1000 for Western blot analysis), and secondary antibodies were purchased from Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc. (Santa Cruz, CA). Anti-KDEL (1:50 for immunocitochemistry) was purchased from Abcam (Cambridge, MA). Anti-pERK (1:1000 for Western blot analysis), anti-pAKT (1:1000 for Western blot analysis) were obtained from Cell Signaling Technology, Inc. (Danvers, MA). MitoTracker Red (MitoTracker Red CMXRos) dye, 4 ́,6-diamidine-2 ́-phenylindole dihydrochloride (DAPI) dye and Alexa Fluor 488-conjugated anti-rabbit secondary antibody (1:200 for immunocitochemistry) were supplied by Molecular Probes (Eugene, OR). Alexa Fluor 568-conjugated antimouse antibody (1:200 for immunocitochemistry) and anti-b-tubulin (1:1500 for Western blot analysis) was purchased from Thermo Fisher Scientific (Rockford, IL). Creatine Kinase detection kit was supplied by Boehringer-Mannheim (Germany). G1 and G15 were purchase from Cayman Chemical Company (Ann Arbor, MI). All the other reagents used were of analytical grade.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!