The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Su8030 fe sem

Manufactured by Hitachi
Sourced in Japan

The SU8030 FE-SEM is a field emission scanning electron microscope (FE-SEM) manufactured by Hitachi. It is designed to provide high-resolution imaging and analysis of a wide range of samples. The SU8030 FE-SEM features a field emission electron source, advanced optics, and a range of detectors to enable detailed examination of materials at the nanoscale level.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

7 protocols using su8030 fe sem

1

Electrochemical Glucose Sensing with PB/Ti3C2Tx/GOx

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All electrochemical characterization was carried out using a portable PalmSens4 (PalmSens, Houten, The Netherlands) (Figure S1a). For the electrochemical detection of blood glucose, chronoamperometry was tested by using USB-C Sensit Smart (PalmSens, Houten, The Netherlands) with PStouch app for Android smart phone as showed in Figure S1b. A CO2 laser cutting machine (60 Watt.) (Cnmanlaser, model MAN-6090, Qingdao, China) was purchased from the MIT group, Thailand. Field emission scanning electron microscope (FESEM) analysis were performed at the National Science and Technology Development Agency, Thailand. HITACHI SU8030 FESEM (Tokyo, Japan) were used to study the morphology of the modified electrode.
The electrochemical properties of PB/Ti3C2Tx/GOx/Nafion on SPIL-GE were characterized by cyclic voltammetry (CV) with 5 mM ferri/ferrocyanide in 0.1 M KCl solution. The chronoamperometry technique was used for characterization to find the optimal concentration of modified nanomaterial and selection of optimal detection potential conditions for quantitative determination of glucose.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Nanomaterial Surface Characterization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
SEM characterizations were carried out on a Hitachi SU8030 FE-SEM. AFM characterizations were acquired with a Bruker ICON System. GIWAXS measurements were performed at Beamline 8-ID-E1 at the Advanced Photon Source (APS) at Argonne National Laboratory. Samples were irradiated with a 10.9 keV X-ray beam at an incidence angle 0.125° to 0.135° in a vacuum for two summed exposures of 2.5 s (totalling 5 s of exposure), and scattered X-rays were recorded by a Pilatus 1 M detector located 228.16 mm from the sample at two different heights.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Generating Inflammatory CoCrMo Particles

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
In order to generate inflammatory conditions in the cell culture tests CoCrMo particles with a known size range were added to the different types of cell cultures. These particles were generated using a tribocorrosion test rig with a pin-on-ball configuration16 (Figure 2a). The experimental conditions were previously developed and optimized by Mathew et al17 ,18 (link) (See Supplementary file). In order to determine the wear particle size range and chemical composition, dynamic light scattering (DLS; Zeta sizer, Nano ZS, Melvern instruments GmbH, Germany) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM, Hitachi SU8030 FE-SEM, Tokyo, Japan) with energy dispersive x-ray spectroscopy (EDS) were employed.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Preparing Biological Samples for SEM

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
SEM samples were critical point dried. Samples were mounted on stubs with carbon tape, and the capillary tubes were carefully cut open to reveal the cells. Cells were further grounded with Ag paint and coated with 5 nm of osmium in a Filgen Osmium Plasma coater. Imaging was performed on a Hitachi SU8030 FE SEM at 3 kV.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Interfacial Microstructure and Adhesion Analysis of LLZTO-Anode Interface

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
We examined the cross-sectional microstructure of the interface between the anode and LLZTO electrolytes using an SU-8030 FE-SEM (Hitachi) coupled with an energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) spectrometer with an accelerating voltage of 5 kV and a working distance of 8 mm. For the sample preparation, the cycled cells were disassembled in an Ar-filled glove box, and after removal of a cathode, the cross-sections of LLZTO in contact with Ag/Ag-C/Li anode were mounted to the sample holder using a load-lock chamber to avoid air exposure.
The adhesion strength between LLZTO and the interlayer was evaluated by measuring the peel strength using a tensile strength tester (AGS-X, Shimadzu). The anode interlayer was attached on the acid-treated surface of the LLZTO by CIP under 250 MPa, and the peel strength was measured by pulling the SUS foil at a cross-head speed of 100 mm/min.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Characterization of MIP-202/CA Composite

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Powder X-ray diffraction (PXRD) analysis were done using a D8 Bruker X-ray powder diffractometer, (CuKα1 radiation, λ = 1.54056 Å) at 40 kV and 40 mA and intensity data for 2θ from 20° to 70° over a period of 30 min. Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) spectra were produced using Bruker Vertex 70 to explore chemical properties of MIP-202 after and before polymeric blend immobilization. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images were investigated using a Hitachi SU8030 FE-SEM (Dallas, TX, USA) microscope. The samples images were performed by transmission electron microscope (TEM) JEOL JEM-2100 200 kV (JEOL, Ltd. Akishima, Tokyo, Japan) by drop casting the MIP-202 powder and grounded MIP-202/CA composited beads and ethanol onto the 200-mesh copper TEM grid. The apparent surface areas were determined from nitrogen adsorption–desorption isotherms collected at 77 K by a Micromeritics Tristar II 3020. Thermal stability of the samples were performed using thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) as the samples were heated room temperature-700 °C with a rate of 10 °C/min under a constant flow of air. Freeze drying was performed with a critical point freeze dryer. Briefly, freeze drying was used in activation the water-soaked samples over a period of eight hours.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Morphological Analysis of Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The morphology of the sample was determined using a scanning electron microscope (Hitachi SU8030 FE-SEM Tokyo, Japan) at an accelerating potential of 5.0kV. All samples were super coated with Au/Pd prior to examination. The particle size was determined using a light microscope (Olympus Research microscope CH20i, Olympus Optical Co, Shinjuku, Japan).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!