The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Sas 9.2 for windows

Manufactured by SAS Institute
Sourced in United States

SAS 9.2 for Windows is a software application that provides a comprehensive platform for data analysis, statistical modeling, and reporting. It offers a wide range of tools and capabilities for data management, statistical analysis, and business intelligence. The software is designed to run on the Windows operating system.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

49 protocols using sas 9.2 for windows

1

Analyzing Treatment Effects Using SAS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The significance between different treatments was analyzed using SAS 9.2 for Windows. Fisher’s LSD (Least Significant Difference) was selected by Bonferroni correction for analyzing the factors including HIU power, treatment time and their interaction. The differences in the results were regarded as significant when P < 0.05.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Statistical Analysis of Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Data were systematically transferred from medical records to Microsoft Excel 2010. Statistical analyses were performed using SAS 9.2 for Windows. Data frequencies (in percentage) were compared using the chi-square test; means were evaluated by analysis of variance (ANOVA), followed by the Tukey-Kramer test for multiple comparisons. Data on maternal, neonatal and delivery outcomes were assessed using logistic regression to calculate odds ratios with confidence intervals (CI 95 %). Significance level was set at p < 0.05.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Statistical Analysis of Experimental Data

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All the data were subjected to a one-way ANOVA procedure provided in SAS 9.2 for Windows. Differences were determined by Duncan’s multiple range tests. A significant difference was defined as p<0.05 and the results are presented as mean±standard deviation.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Biomass and Carbon Dynamics Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Normality of aboveground and below-ground plant biomass and SOC stocks was tested using the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test. The significance of differences among the three treatments considering the aboveground and below-ground plant biomass and 13C stocks was tested by ANOVA, which was calculated separately for each layer; P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant for treatment means. We used nonlinear least squares (function Bnls^) to fit Eq. 5. Statistical analysis was performed using SAS 9.2 for Windows.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Evaluating Factors Influencing MOAI

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Primary endpoint was the change in MOAI before vs. after treatment. Due to non-normally distributed data a sign-test was used. A p-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant concerning the primary endpoint. All other analyses are regarded descriptive. The following factors were analyzed for their possible influence on MOAI change between admission and discharge: gender (male vs. female), age at admission (≤28d vs. >28d) and failure-to-thrive (SDS for weight ≤1.28 vs. >1.28). All analyses were done with statistical software (SAS 9.2 for Windows; SAS; Heidelberg, Germany).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Statistical Analysis Using SAS Software

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Statistical analysis was performed using the software SAS (p ≤ 0.05; SAS 9.2 for Windows; SAS Institute, Cary, NC).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Assessing PLR Coverage Probability

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A simulation experiment was conducted to study the empirical performance of PLR with respect to coverage probability. Coverage probability is defined as the probability that the procedure produces an interval that covers the true (regression coefficient) value. In order to investigate the performance of this method in the presence of complete and quasi separations, we created 1,000 datasets, each with different sample of sizes n = (30, 75, 150) and with a different number of covariates k = (2, 3, 4). We used Monte Carlo method to obtain the 95% coverage probability of PLR. We conducted the simulation experiment by using SAS 9.2 for windows (SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, NC, 2000) statistical software. The R, STATA, and SAS codes for doing PLR are given in the appendix.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Evaluating the Effect of Food Type on Nutrient Ratios

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The effect of food type (i.e. extruded, pelleted and canned for dog foods, extruded and canned for cat foods) on RL:TL was tested for significance using ANOVA by Proc GLM of SAS 9.2 for Windows (SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA). In case P ≤ 0·05 for significant effects, pairwise comparisons were made using post hoc analysis and corresponding P values were reported. Results are presented as the means with their standard errors .
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Arterial Injury and P2Y12 Deficiency

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Data are presented as mean±SE. Student t tests were used for the comparisons between the wild‐type (WT) and P2Y12‐deficient mice and between the control and sham groups. A paired t test was used for the comparison of the relative blood flow before and 1 hour after arterial injury. Two‐way ANOVA was used for the comparison among the genotype (WT/P2Y12 deficiency) and the injury (pre/post). Dunnett's test was used for the comparison between the control and all prasugrel groups. In all the analyses, statistical significance was defined as P<0.05. SAS 9.2 for Windows (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC) and EXSUS Ver. 7.7.1 (Arm Systex Co., Ltd., Osaka, Japan) were used for the analyses.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Predictors of Primary Care Quality

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Mean and standard deviation were applied for the description of average score. The differences in sociodemographic characteristics and quality of primary care measured by PCAT across healthcare provider types (GPs and non-GPs) were tested by bivariate chi square for categorical variables and by t test for continuous variables. In order to determine the association between healthcare provider types and quality of primary care, multiple linear regressions were performed after controlling for sociodemographic characteristics of providers. Finally, logistic regression was used to determine the independent predictors of GPs’ intention to stay. All analyses were conducted using SAS 9.2 for Windows.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!