The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

83 protocols using pspcas9 bb 2a puro

1

Genome editing of H9 hESCs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
H9 hESCs were maintained in mTeSR1 medium (85870; STEMCELL Technologies) on a Matrigel (356231; Corning)-coated plate. For nucleofection, cells were dissociated with Accutase (Merck) for 8 min at 37 °C, diluted in 10 µM Y27632 (Merck) mTeSR1, centrifuged at 110g for 3 min and resuspended in 10 µM Y27632 mTeSR1. A total of 106 cells were nucleofected using Human Stem Cell Nucleofector Kit 2 (program G-017; Lonza) with 5 µg pSpCas9(BB)-2A-puro (62988; Addgene) expressing two sgRNAs. After nucleofection, the cells were transferred to a 12-well plate containing 1 ml 10 µM Y27632 mTeSR1. After 24 h, the cells were selected for puromycin resistance by replacing the medium with 10 µM fresh Y27632 mTeSR1 containing 0.5 µg ml−1 puromycin for 24 h. After selection, the hESCs were cultured in mTeSR1 without Y27632. After two passages, the cells were dissociated and plated at low density. Isolated clones were transferred and maintained in 96-well plates until genotyping.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Circadian Clock Disruption in β-TC6 Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Exon 8 of Bmal1 and exons 6 and 7 of Clock were deleted in β-TC6 cells by CRISPR–Cas9 and homology-directed repair (HDR). For Bmal1, intronic DNA flanking Bmal1 exon 8 was cloned into pTOPO2.1 (pBmal1-HR) (Invitrogen), and cells were cotransfected with guide RNA, Cas9 [pSpCas9(BB)-2A-Puro; Addgene], and pBmal1-HR plasmids. Stably integrated clones were selected for neomycin resistance (G418, Mediatech), and single colonies were hand picked and cultured individually. RNA and protein were extracted from these colonies and Bmal1 mRNA and protein were assessed by qPCR and Western blot. For Clock, cells were cotransfected with guide RNA, Cas9 (Clock CRISPR/Cas9 KO plasmids; Santa Cruz Biotechnology), and Clock HDR plasmids (Santa Cruz Biotechnology sc-419693-HDR). Stably integrated clones were selected for puromycin resistance (puromycin dihydrochloride, Sigma-Aldrich), and single colonies were hand picked and cultured individually. RNA and protein were extracted from these colonies and Clock mRNA and protein were assessed by qPCR and Western blot.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

CRISPR Plasmid Cloning and Validation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
pSpCas9(BB)-2A-Puro (PX459; Catalog # 48139), pSpCas9(BB)-2A-GFP (PX458; Catalog # 48318), lentiGuide-Puro (Catalog # 52963), pL-CRISPR.EFS.tRFP (Catalog # 57819), pLKO5.sgRNA.EFS.GFP (Catalog # 57822), pLV hU6-sgRNA hUbC-dCas9-KRAB-T2a-GFP (Catalog # 71237), pHR-SFFV-dCas9-BFP-KRAB (Catalog # 46911), pMD2.G (Catalog # 12259) and psPAX2 (Catalog # 12260) were obtained from Addgene. sgRNAs were cloned in appropriate vectors according to manufacturer instructions. Top and bottom oligonucleotides constituting sgRNAs were cloned into appropriate plasmids optimized for mammalian expression. Cloned plasmids were subsequently sequenced for verification of correct sgRNA sequence and orientation.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

CRISPR-Cas9 Knockout Protocol for HCT-Oxa-c Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The sgRNA-23b and sgRNA-27b were designed using the Benchling program (Supplementary Figure S7) and inserted into pSpCas9(BB)-2A-Puro (Addgene 62988) as described previously [22 (link)]. HCT-Oxa-c cells (15 × 104 cells/well) were seeded in 24-well plates 24 h before transfection and constructs were transfected into HCT-Oxa-c cells using Lipofectamine LTX (Thermo Fisher Scientific) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. After 48 h of transfection, cells were incubated for 48–72 h with 2 µg/mL puromycin (Sigma). Then puromycin-resistant cells were isolated through serial dilutions, seeding one cell per well of 96-well plates. Cells were grown in an incubator for 1–2 weeks, when cultivated into 24-well plates. Some of the cells were collected into tubes and indels were detected as described previously using polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis [23 (link)]. PCR was carried out with the Phire Tissue Direct PCR master Mix (Thermo Fisher Scientific). The list of primers and single-guide RNA (sgRNA) sequences (Metabion) are provided in Supplementary Table S15.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

POLA1 L764S Knock-in Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
pLX-sgPOLA1 was created by cloning POLA1 guide RNA (5′- gTTAGTGATCTGCAATGCTAA -3′) into the pLX-sgRNA vector (Addgene 50662). For POLA1 L764S knock-in, 1 million HCT-116 or HeLa cells were nucleofected (using 4D-Nucleofector, Lonza) with two plasmids, pSpCas9(BB)-2A-Puro (Addgene 48139) and pLX-sgPOLA1, and the single-stranded oligo 5′- ACCCCAAGCAAACACTGAATCCAACAGGAAATGCTTTTTCCCCCTTTCTAAGTTAAATTTACCATAATGTTCCCAGCGATGTTAGTGATCTGCAATGCTGATGGAAGAACATTTAGCTCACACATGATCTGCAAAATGAACTTGGCATCTTTCCAGGTGTGTTCCAACAGGTATAACAGTTGAGAAGATTCACTGTACAG -3′. Afterwards, cells were exposed to 5 μM CD437 for 7-13 days to select for cells with POLA1 L764S knock-in. Clones were then expanded through sequential transfers to 24-well, 6-well and 10 cm plates. To validate knock-in, genomic DNA sequence flanking L764S were amplified from isolated clones with 5′ AGCATTGGGATCAGTGGTATG-3′ and 5′- TGTAAAACGACGGCCAGTTTCTCCCAACCAGTTCTTCCT-3′, and Sanger sequenced with M13 forward primer 5′- TGTAAAACGACGGCCAGT. For crystal violet staining, cells on plates were stained with 0.05% crystal violet, 1% formaldehyde in 1× PBS for 20 min at room temperature, followed by several rinses with deionized water to remove free stain.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Generation of Genetically Engineered HEK293T Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
HEK293T knockout cell lines were generated by transient transfection of pSpCas9(BB)-2A-Puro (Addgene #48139) encoding U6 driven expression of sgRNAs (Scramble Guide: GCACTACCAGAGCTAACTCA; ATG7 Guide: ACACACTCGAGTCTTTCAAG; ATG12 Guide: CCGTCTTCCGCTGCAGTTTC; ATG14 Guide: CTACTTCGACGGCCGCGACC; FIP200 Guide: AGAGTGTGTACCTACAGTGC). Cells were selected 48–72 hours post-transfection with 1μg/ml puromycin for 48 h. Polyclonal populations were collected for Surveyor analysis (IDT, 706020) and were sorted into single-cell populations by limiting dilution at 1.5 cells/well per 96-well plate. For DNA analysis, genomic DNA samples were prepared using QuickExtract (Epicentre). The PCR products were column purified and analysed with Surveyor Mutation Detection Kit (IDT). For genotyping of single-sorted cells, PCR amplified products encompassing the edited region (ATG7 Fw: TGGGGGACAGTAGAACAGCA, ATG7 Rev: CCTGGATGTCCTCTCCCTGA; ATG12 Fw: AGCCGGGAACACCAAGTTT, ATG12 Rev: GTGGCAGCCAAGTATCAGGC; ATG14 Fw: AAAATCCCACGTGACTGGCT, ATG14 Rev: AATGGCAGCAACGGGAAAAC; FIP200 Fw: ATTCTCTGGCTTGACAGGACAG, FIP200 Rev: AAATACTGAGCGTGCACATTGC) were cloned into pCR™4-TOPO® TA vector using the TOPO-TA cloning kit (Thermo Fisher #450030) and sequence verified. Sequencing is available upon request.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

CRISPR-Mediated HLA-G Knockout in JEG-3 Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
HLA-G knockout JEG-3 cells were generated using CRISPR/Cas9-based gene editing technology (20 (link)). As described previously, small guide RNAs were synthesized by the Shanghai Sheng Gong Company (21 (link)) (Supplemental Table 1); they were then cloned into the sg-RNA expression vector pSpCas9(BB)-2A-Puro (Addgene, USA). For transfection, a NEPAGENE (Nepa Gene, Japan) electroporator with a poring pulse (voltage, 150 V; pulse length, 7.5 ms) was used. After transfection, JEG-3 cells were selected using puromycin (2 µg/ml). The efficiency of HLA-G knockout was validated by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and western blot analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Stable CRISPR-Cas9 HEK293T Cell Line

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A HEK293T cell line stably expressing GFP-LC3-RFP and Cas9 (HEK293T GFP-LC3-RFP cells) was generated as previously described (6 (link)). LentiCas9-Blast (52962 (37 (link)); Addgene), human GeCKO v2 Library (1000000049 (37 (link)); Addgene), lentiCRISPR v2 (52961 (37 (link)); Addgene), and pSp-Cas9(BB)-2A-Puro (48139 (64 (link)); Addgene) were provided by F. Zhang (Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA). For CRISPR knockouts, sgRNAs were cloned into lentiCRISPR v2 and pSp-Cas9(BB)-2A-Puro, sequences of which are listed in Table S5. For stable expression, GFP-LC3-RFP reporter was inserted into pMRX-IP (65 (link)) and pMRX-IB (6 (link)), and PFAS (NM_012393) tagged with 3 × FLAG was inserted into pMRX-IB (6 (link)) (these plasmids were generated from pMXs (66 (link))).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Cas9-Mediated Goat miR-24 Editing

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
sgRNAs targeting the goat pre-miR-24 genomic sequence were designed using the Guide RNA web tool (http://chopchop.cbu.uib.no/ (accessed on 11 November 2020)). Two sgRNAs targeting both ends of the pre-miR-24 genomic sequence were selected for the Cas9-sgRNA1-sgRNA2 vector construction. The plasmid pSpCas9 (BB)-2A-Puro (62988, Addgene, Cambridge, MA, USA) was chosen as the backbone and used as a control. The double-stranded sequences of sgRNA1 and sgRNA2 were annealed by two complementary single-strand oligonucleotides from Invitrogen corporation (Shanghai, China). Thereafter, the double-stranded fragments of sgRNA1 and sgRNA2 were inserted at the BbsI site into the plasmid pX459 to construct pX459-sgRNA1 and pX459-sgRNA2 plasmids. The U6-sgRNA2-tracRNA sequences from pX459-sgRNA2 were amplified by PCR using the following primers: forward 5′-CACCTCTAGAGAGGGCCTATTTCCCATGATTCCTTCATAT-3′ and reverse 5′-CACCGGTACAAAAAAGCACCGACTCGGTGCCACTTTTTC-3′. The PCR fragment was then cloned at XbaI-KpnI sites into the plasmid pX459-sgRNA1 to generate the Cas9-sgRNA1-sgRNA2 plasmid, which was used to select single-cell clones and subsequent functional verification.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

CRISPR/Cas9-mediated gene editing in C2C12 cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Px459 plasmid [pSpCas9(BB)-2A-Puro; Addgene] (Ran et al., 2013 (link)) was modified by the insertion of annealed, phosphorylated oligonucleotides (Forward: 5′-CACCTCATCGTGCACTCCGAGAAG-3′ and Reverse: 5′-AAACCTTCTCGGAGTGCACGATGA-3′) containing the Ky target sequence into the site created by AgeI digestion of the plasmid. C2C12 myoblasts were transfected with the modified Px459 plasmid using GenJet In Vitro DNA Transfection reagent for C2C12 cells, following the manufacturer's instructions (SL100489-C2C12). To test construct mutagenic capacity, puromycin-resistant cells selected en masse were harvested, lysed and the target region amplified by PCR (F: 5′-GGGGCCATTTGCAGCCTA-3′ and R: 5′-CGGAGAGGTTCGGATTAGCC-3′). PCR products were incubated at 37°C for 1 h with T7 endonuclease I; cleavage at the target site indicated successful mutagenesis. Individual clones were isolated by dilution following another round of construct transfection and puromycin selection. Clones were tested for mutagenesis by screening for heteroduplex formation in annealed WT and clone PCR amplicons run on 15% PAGE (Zhu et al., 2014 (link)). Alleles were then characterised by TA-cloning of PCR products using a TA Cloning kit (Thermo Scientific) and Sanger sequencing. Clones predicted to have two disruptive alleles (D, I and K) were carried forward for analysis and validated by qPCR (Fig. S1).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!