The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

128 protocols using spss software 21

1

Analyzing Periodontal Inflammation Responses

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All experiments were performed in triplicate. Results were expressed as means ± SE. An unpaired two tailed t test was performed to analyse data from two groups, and one‐way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was performed to analyse data involving more than two groups. Significance analysis of data from healthy and inflammatory periodontal tissues was also performed with a t test. Values of P ≤ .05 were considered statistically significant. All data analysis was performed with SPSS software 21.0 (SPSS Inc). Corresponding symbols in figures are * for P < .05, ** for P < .01 and *** for P < .001.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Statistical Analysis of Differences

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The evaluation of statistical significance of observed differences was performed by one-way analysis of variance (One-way ANOVA), the differences between means were determined using Duncan’s multiple comparison test, and the statistical significance was set at p < 0.05 using SPSS software 21.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Comparative Analysis of Novel Treatments

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The data are presented as the means ± the standard deviation. The multiple-group comparisons were performed by one-way analyses of variance (ANOVAs) followed by Student–Newman–Keuls’ or Dunnett’s post hoc tests. The internal-group comparisons were performed by T tests. The bars in the icon indicate the means + the SEMs. The statistical analyses were conducted with SPSS software (21.0, Chicago, IL, USA). A P-value < 0.05 was considered significant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Statistical Analysis of Experimental Data

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The data were analyzed with the professional SPSS software 21.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Continuous variables were analyzed and compared using Tukey’s post hoc test validated by ANOVA among multiple groups. Categorical variables were analyzed using the chi-square test in multiple groups. Statistical significance was defined as p<0.05. All data were obtained from at least 6 independent tests or experiments.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Analyzing T Cell Dynamics and Viral Loads

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS software 21.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) and GraphPad Prism version 6.0 (GraphPad Inc., San Diego, CA, USA). An independent-samples t-test was used for comparisons of differences in CD4+ T cell counts and plasma viral loads between two independent groups. A paired-samples t-test was used to compare CD4+ T cell counts and plasma viral loads between different time points within the same group. Spearman’s correlation analysis was used to assess the relationships between CD4/CD8 ratio and CD4+ T cell count, CD8+ T cell count, or plasma vRNA level. Values of P < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Plyometric Training and Whole-Body Vibration

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Statistical analysis was done using SPSS software 21.0 (SPSS Inc. Chicago, IL, USA). The descriptive data are presented as mean ± standard deviation. Shapiro–Wilk test was used to confirm the normality of the distribution scores. A 2 × 3 repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) with time (at baseline, 4 min, 12 min of posttest), protocol (plyometric training and WBV), and the interaction effect (time × protocol) was used. If the main effect of the protocol was not significant, post hoc analysis was not employed. Whereas, if the main effect of time was significant, a post hoc analysis using Bonferroni correction was applied on time. The significance level was set at p < 0.05.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Statistical Analysis of Experimental Data

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Data analysis was performed with one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) test with post hoc contrasts by Student–Newman–Keuls test by using SPSS software 21.0 (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL). The statistical analysis of survival rate was performed with Log-rank (Mantel-Cox) test by Prism 7.0 software. For all studies, data are presented as mean ± standard deviation. p Values less than .05 were considered statistically significant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Comprehensive Statistical Analysis of Tumor Progression

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Based on the SPSS software 21.0 (Chicago, IL, USA), the differences in WB assay, cell migration and invasion assays, subcutaneous tumor volumes, and the number of liver metastases were compared through Student’s t test. Non-parametric and Spearman correlation tests were analyzed for IHC assays in vivo and human PC samples. The association of Numb expression with clinicopathological data was analyzed by Chi-squared test and Spearman correlation test. P < 0.05 or P < 0.01 was considered significant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Statistical Analysis of Morris Water Maze

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Data were analyzed by SPSS software 21.0 (Chicago, IL, United States) and expressed as the mean ± standard error of the mean (Mean ± SEM). The exclusion of outliers follows a standard analytical procedure to avoid undue influence. Differences among the experimental groups were determined by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by least significant difference post hoc test. The data recorded from the acquisition trails of the MWMT among the groups over a period of 5 days were analyzed with repeated measures and a multivariate analysis of variance (ANOVA) process of the general linear model. p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant and p < 0.01 indicates a very significant difference.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Statistical Analysis of Hub Gene Expression

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The expression of hub genes was assessed using the Wilcoxon Signed rank test and Mann–Whitney U test. Experimental data were expressed as mean ± standard deviations from three independent experiments and were analyzed using SPSS software (21.0; SPSS, Inc, Chicago, IL). Continuous variables between two groups or among three groups were compared using the unpaired Student’s t-test or one-way analysis of variance (Bonferroni post hoc test) as appropriate. Categorical variables were compared using the Chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test as appropriate. All statistical tests were two-sided and a P-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!