The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

3200 q trap

Manufactured by Thermo Fisher Scientific
Sourced in United States, Canada

The 3200 Q TRAP is a hybrid triple quadrupole linear ion trap mass spectrometer. It is designed for high-sensitivity quantitative and qualitative analysis of small molecules. The instrument combines the functionality of a triple quadrupole and a linear ion trap in a single platform, enabling both sensitive quantification and comprehensive structural characterization of analytes.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

26 protocols using 3200 q trap

1

Protein Identification in M. tuberculosis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The selected spots were identified by a previously described protocol [21 (link), 22 (link)]. Protein identification was performed using a 3200 QTRAP hybrid tandem mass spectrometer (3200 QTRAP, Applied Biosystems, USA) equipped with a nanoelectrospray ion source (NanoSpray II) and a MicroIonSpray II head. Proteins were identified based on their MS/MS spectra datasets using the MASCOT search algorithm (Version 1.6b9, Matrix Science, London, UK). A BLAST search was conducted comparing the sequences to the M. tuberculosis complex and Eubacteria kingdom sequences of the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) nonredundant database (NCBI nr20070623).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Hormone Profiling of Root Tissues

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Root tissue samples (30–80 mg fresh weight) were purified and analyzed according to Dobrev and Kamínek [32 (link)] and Dobrev and Vankova [33 (link)], as described in our previous publication [28 (link)]. The root tip tissues were collected in two replications, and the mean values are provided. Briefly, samples were, after homogenization, extracted with cold (−20 °C) methanol:water:formic acid (15:4:1, v/v/v). The labelled internal standards (10 pmol per sample) were added. The phytohormones were separated with a mixed-mode reverse phase cation-exchange SPE column (Oasis-MCX; Waters, Milford, MA, USA) into the acid fraction by elution with methanol (auxins, ABA, SA, JA, GA) and into the basic fraction by elution with 0.35 M NH4OH in 60% methanol (CKs). Hormone metabolites were analyzed using HPLC (Ultimate 3000; Dionex, Sunnyvale, CA, USA) coupled to a hybrid triple quadrupole/linear ion-trap mass spectrometer (3200 Q TRAP; Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Quantitative analysis of plant hormones

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Root samples were collected from ten-days old plants. Five root samples (150 mg each) were collected from Hs-Tyr-expressing plants (Line 2.3) or Col-0. Root samples were purified and analysed as mentioned previously43 (link), 44 (link). Briefly, samples were homogenized with a ball mill (MM301, Retsch) and extracted in cold (−20 °C) methanol/water/formic acid (15/4/1 v/v/v). The following labelled internal standards (10 pmol/sample) were added: 13C6-IAA (Cambridge Isotope Laboratories); 2H4-SA (Sigma-Aldrich); 2H2-OxIAA and 2H5-JA(Olchemim). Extracts were purified using SPE-C18 column (SepPak-C18, Waters) and a mixed mode reverse phase–cation exchange SPE column (Oasis-MCX, Waters). Hormone metabolites were analysed using HPLC (Ultimate 3000, Dionex) coupled to a hybrid triple quadrupole/linear ion trap mass spectrometer (3200 Q TRAP, Applied Biosystems). Quantification of hormones was done using the isotope dilution method with multilevel calibration curves (r2 > 0.99). Data processing was carried out with Analyst 1.5 software (Applied Biosystems). Data are presented as mean ± standard error.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

HPLC-MS Analysis of Harmine in Mouse Serum

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
HPLC-MS was done on
a 3200 QTRAP (Applied Biosystems) equipped with a Shimadzu (Kyoto,
Japan) UFLC System. Mouse serum and harmine were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich.
Pooled CD1 mouse liver (female) microsomes were purchased from XenoTech,
LCC (Lenexa, KS) with protein concentrations of 0.5 mg/mL. HCT116
cell lysates were prepared with PhosphoSafe lysis buffer (Novagen,
San Diego, CA). Protein concentration was determined by using the
BCA Assay. Analysis was carried out similarly as previously described.21 (link)
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Purification and Characterization of Organic Compounds

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All solvents and reagents were purchased from either Sigma-Aldrich or Alfa Aesar and were used as received without further purification. Melting points were measured on a MPA100 OptiMelt automated melting point apparatus without correction. IR spectra were recorded on a Thermo Scientific Nicolet iS10 FT-IR spectrometer. Analytical thin-layer chromatography (TLC) analyses were carried out on Analtech Uniplate F254 plates, and FCC was performed over silica gel (230–400 mesh, Merck). 1H (400 MHz) and 13C (100 MHz) nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectra were recorded on a Bruker Ultrashield 400 Plus spectrometer, and chemical shifts were expressed in ppm. Mass spectra were obtained on an Applied BioSystems 3200 Q trap with a turbo V source for TurbolonSpray. Analytical reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) was performed on a Varian ProStar 210 system using the Agilent Microsorb-MV 100–5 C18 column (250 × 4.6 mm). All analyses were conducted at ambient temperature with a flow rate of 0.8 mL/min. Mobile phase is acetonitrile/water (90/10) with 0.1% trifluoroacetic acid (TFA). The UV detector was set up at 210 nm. Compound purities were calculated as the percentage peak area of the analyzed compound, and retention times (Rt) were presented in minutes. The purity of all newly synthesized compounds was identified as ≥95%.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

LC-MS/MS Analysis of Analytes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
An Agilent 1200 chromatograph (Agilent Technologies, Palo Alto, CA, USA) coupled to a 3200 QTRAP® (Applied Biosystems, AB Sciex, Foster City, CA, USA) with Turbo Ion Spray (ESI) electrospray ionization was employed for the determination. The instrumental parameters were fixed as previously indicated [31 (link)].
The chromatographic separation was performed with a Gemini-NX column C18 (Phenomenex, 150 mm × 4.6 mm, 5 particle size) preceded by a guard column. Mobile phases consisted of: 5 mM ammonium formate, 0.1% formic acid water (A) and 5 mM ammonium formate, 0.1% formic acid methanol (B). The gradient program started with a proportion of 0% for eluent B; increasing to 100% in 10 min, then decreasing to 80% in 5 min, and finally to 70% in 2 min. Then, the column was cleaned and readjusted to initial conditions in the next 6 min, and equilibrated during 7 min. The instrumental parameters were fixed as follows: injection volume of 20 µL, flow rate at 0.25 mL/min and oven temperature at 40 °C. The Turbo Ion Spray operated in positive ionization mode (ESI+). Nitrogen served as a nebulizer and collision gas. Ion spray voltage was fixed at 5500 V, the curtain gas was set at 20 (arbitrary units), the nebulizer (GS1) and TIS (GS2) gases at 50 and 50 psi, respectively, and the probe temperature (TEM) was set at 450 °C.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Characterization of Organic Compounds

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Chemical reagents were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich, Alfa Aesar, Combi-blocks, or AK Scientific and used without further purification. TLC analyses were carried out on Analtech Uniplate F254 plates. Chromatographic purification was accomplished on silica gel columns (230–400 mesh, Bodman). IR spectra were recorded on a Nicolet Avatar 360 FT-IR Instrument with ATR attachment. 1H (400 MHz) and 13C (100 MHz) nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectra were acquired on a Bruker Ultrashield 400 Plus spectrometer. HREIMS analysis was performed on a Quattro II triple quadrupole mass spectrometer, a Waters Micromass QTOF-II instrument (ESI source), or an Applied Bio Systems 3200 Q trap with a turbo V source for TurbolonSpray.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Quantification of Phenolics in EFAA

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Analysis for physiological phenolics in EFAA was performed using the 3200 QTRAP with a hybrid triple quadrupole-linear ion mass spectrometer (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA), and C18 column (250 × 4.6 mm, 5.0 μm, ProntoSIL, BISCHOFF Chromatography, Germany) was used. The eluent solvents were used to A (0.1% formic acid in distilled water) and B (0.1% formic acid in acetonitrile), and a gradient condition was applied as follows (min, %B): (0, 20), (20, 60), (30, 90). The flow rate was 0.5 mL/min with a 20 μL injection volume, column oven temperature of 30°C, and all the analyses were carried out using a TurboIonSpray ionization source, and ESI-MS conditions were as follows: negative-ion mode, curtain gas (N2) 20 (arbitrary units), drying gas (N2) heated to 650°C, and a variety of collision energies.
Analysis for contents of phenolics in EFAA was performed using the high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) with a photodiode array UV-Vis detector system (Shimadzu Corporation, Kyoto, Japan), and C18 column (250 × 4.6 mm, 5.0 μm, ProntoSIL, BISCHOFF Chromatography, Germany) was used. The mobile phase was used to acetonitrile: 10 mM KH2PO4 (10 : 90, v/v), isocratic, and monitored for 30 min (wavelength 205 nm). The flow rate was 1.0 mL/min with a 10 μL injection volume and column oven temperature of 30°C.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Quantification of Plant Phytohormones

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Frozen samples (100 mg FW) were homogenized with liquid nitrogen in a mortar and pestle. The phytohormones were extracted with a cold (−20 °C) methanol/water/formic acid mixture (15/4/1, v/v), as described in [84 ]. Internal isotope-labeled standards (10 pmol per sample) were added for hormone analysis: 13C6-IAA (Cambridge Isotope Laboratories, Tewksbury, MA, USA); 2H4-SA (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA); 2H3-PA, 2H3-DPA, 2H5-ABA-GE (NRC-PBI, Saskatoon, SK, Canada); and 2H6-ABA, 2H5-JA, and others (Olchemim, Olomouc, Czech Republic). The extracts were passed through reversed-phase cation exchange SPE columns (Oasis-MCX, Waters, Milford, MA, USA) in a mixed mode (mixed phase–cation exchange). The hormone fraction containing ABA, IAA, SA, and JA was eluted with methanol. Hormone metabolites were analyzed using HPLC (Ultimate 3000, Dionex, Sunnyvale, CA, USA) coupled to a hybrid triple quadrupole/linear ion trap mass spectrometer (3200 Q TRAP, Applied Biosystems, Waltham, MA, USA). The quantification of hormones was carried out using the isotope dilution method with multilevel calibration curves (R2 > 0.99). Data processing was carried out with Analyst 1.5 software (Applied Biosystems).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Arabidopsis Hormone Profiling Under Heat Stress

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
7-day-old Arabidopsis WT, npc1-1, NPC1-OE seedlings were grown on agar plates and used for hormone analyses. The plants were kept in HS (42°C) or in control conditions for 45 min. After treatment, 150 mg of fresh weight was frozen in liquid nitrogen. The determination of plant hormones included extraction and purification on a mixed mode reversed phase – cation exchange SPE column (Oasis-MCX, Waters). The purified fractions were analyzed as in Dobrev and Vankova (2012) (link) on an HPLC (Ultimate 3000, Dionex) coupled to a hybrid triple quadrupole/linear ion trap mass spectrometer (3200 Q TRAP, Applied Biosystems) set in selected reaction monitoring mode. Quantification of hormones was performed using an isotope dilution method with multilevel calibration curves (r2> 0.99). Data processing was carried out with Analyst 1.5 software (Applied Biosystems).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!