The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Magnetom trio 3.0t scanner

Manufactured by Siemens
Sourced in Germany

The Magnetom Trio 3.0T scanner is a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) system manufactured by Siemens. It operates at a magnetic field strength of 3.0 Tesla, which allows for high-quality imaging of the human body. The Magnetom Trio 3.0T scanner is designed to capture detailed images of anatomical structures and physiological processes within the body.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

7 protocols using magnetom trio 3.0t scanner

1

Contrast-Enhanced CT and MRI Imaging Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
With the patient in the supine position, plain and two-phase (arterial and portal vein phases) iodinated contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) scans were obtained in a craniocaudal direction using either of two scanners, namely the Sensation 16 CT or Somatom Definition dual-source CT (Siemens Medical Solutions, Erlangen, Germany). Routine scanning was conducted at an 8-mm section thickness and a 5-mm scan increment; scans were reconstructed with a 2-mm thickness using an appropriate algorithm. A dual-syringe injector system (Medrad Medical Equipment Trading Co., Ltd., Beijing, China) was used to intravenously administer 100 ml non-ionic contrast media (Ultravist; 370 mgI/ml; Bayer AG, Leverkusen, Germany) at a rate of 3 ml/sec, followed by a 20–30-ml saline chaser bolus. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans were acquired using a Magnetom Trio 3.0T scanner (Siemens Medical Solutions). Routine scanning of transverse sections was performed with T2-weighted fast spin-echo sequences, two-dimensional gradient echo in the axial plane, and T2-weighted half-Fourier acquisition single-shot turbo spin echo without fat saturation. A three-dimensional gradient echo sequence (VIBE) with fat saturation was performed prior to and following the intravenous bolus administration of gadopentetate dimeglumine (Magnevist; Schering, Berlin, Germany) at a dose of 0.1 mmol/kg.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Resting-State fMRI Connectivity Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
MRI scans were obtained on a Magnetom Trio 3.0T scanner (Siemens, Erlangen, Germany). Functional images were acquired using a gradient echo T2-weighted pulse sequence with TR = 2000 ms, TE = 30 ms, matrix = 64 × 64, field of view (FOV) = 240 mm × 240 mm, slice thickness = 4 mm, and flip angle (FA) = 90°. Each functional resting-state scan lasted 7 min, and 210 volumes were collected.
Functional connectivity analysis was performed with REST as described previously.12 (link) The representative time series of each region was estimated by averaging the fMRI time series over all voxels in the region. The model goodness criteria were the Pearson’s correlation coefficient as well as the mean absolute error (MAE) between the real and estimated MoCA scores.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Multisite Whole-Brain fMRI Imaging

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Whole-brain fMRI images were collected using Siemens Magnetom Trio 3.0-T scanner at Weill Cornell Medical College Citigroup Biomedical Imaging Center and University of California, Los Angeles: Staglin IMHRO Center for Cognitive Neuroscience. Identical scanning parameters were used at both sites. Biomedical Informatic Research Network (Jovicich et al., 2016 (link)) optimized sequences were used to acquire T1-weighted magnetization-prepared rapid-acquisition gradient-echo (MPRAGE) sequence scan (repetition time (TR) = 2170 ms, echo time (TE) = 4.33 ms, slice thickness = 1.2 mm, sagittal slice number = 160, and 256-mm field of view (FOV)). T2*-sensitive echo planar pulse sequences were used to acquire functional images (TR = 2,500 ms, TE = 30 ms, slice thickness = 4-mm, axial slice number = 38, FOV = 200 mm, flip angle = 90°, and 3.1 × 3.1 × 4.0 mm voxels).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Whole-Head MRI Imaging Protocols

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Whole-head anatomical images were obtained using a T1-weighted 3D MP-RAGE protocol (TR = 2,250 ms, TE = 4.11 ms, flip angle = 9°, FOV = 256 × 256 mm, in-plane resolution = 256 × 256 pixels, voxel size = 1.0 × 1.0 × 1.0 mm). Whole-head T2-weighted images were obtained using a T2-weighted SPC protocol (TR = 3,200 ms, TE = 567 ms, FOV = 256 × 256 mm, in-plane resolution = 256 × 256 pixels, voxel size = 1.0 × 1.0 × 1.0 mm). The first 10 participants were scanned with a Siemens Magnetom Trio 3.0 T scanner (Siemens, Erlangen, Germany) and the remainder with a Siemens Prisma scanner. The same sequences were used for the scanners.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

MRI-based Tumor Segmentation Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The feature extraction in the current study followed the Image Biomarker Standardization Initiative (IBSI) guideline (21 (link)). T2-weighted images were obtained on a Magnetom Trio 3.0T scanner (Siemens, Erlangen, Germany) with a 12-channel receive-only head coil. The parameters were set as follows: repetition time = 5,800 ms; echo time = 110 ms; flip angle = 150 degrees; 24 slices; field of view = 240 × 188 mm2; voxel size = 0.6 × 0.6 × 5.0 mm3; matrix = 384 × 300. Tumors were semi-automatically segmented along the lesion contour on each patient's T2-weighted images in native space by at least two experienced neuroradiologists using the ITK-SNAP software (v 3.6.0; www.itksnap.org), while two other board-certified experts reviewed the segmentations using imaging features in combination with seizure history, clinical examination, neuroimaging data to solve any discrepancies. The areas with abnormal hyperintense signals on the images were identified as tumor volumes, and the cerebrospinal fluid signals should not be involved in. When the concordance between the tumor masks of one patient identified by the two neuroradiologists was higher than 95%, the tumor masks were combined.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

MRI-Based Segmentation of Low-Grade Gliomas

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
MRI scans were obtained on a Magnetom Trio 3.0T scanner (Siemens, Erlangen, Germany) using a 12-channel receive-only head coil. The T2-weighted image parameters were as follows: repetition time = 5800 ms; echo time = 110 ms; flip angle = 150 degrees; 24 slices; field of view = 240 × 188 mm2; voxel size = 0.6× 0.6 × 5.0 mm3; matrix = 384 × 300. Tumors were traced directly on the brain MRIs using MRIcron (http://www.mccauslandcenter.sc.edu/mricro/mricron). Masks of the brain tumors were drawn on each patient's T2-weighted images in native space by two board-certified neuroradiologists, which were blinded to the patients' clinical information. Areas that produced abnormally hyperintense signals on T2-weighted images were identified as LGG tumor areas. The tumor masks were combined when there was less than a 5% discrepancy between the individual masks identified by the two neuroradiologists. When a >5% discrepancy existed between these two masks, the masks utilized were determined by a senior neuroradiologist.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Glioma Segmentation on 3T MRI

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All MRI examinations were performed using a Magnetom Trio 3.0 T scanner (Siemens, Erlangen, Germany) with a 12-channel receive-only head coil scan acquisition. The T2WI parameters were as follows: repetition time (TR), 5,800 ms; echo time (TE), 110 ms; flip angle, 150°; the field of view (FOV), 240 × 188 mm2; voxel size, 0.6 × 0.6 × 5.0 mm3; and matrix, 384 × 300. The MRI data were stored in DICOM format.
Regions of interest (ROIs) of the gliomas were drawn by two neuroradiologists with more than 5 years of clinical experience with ITK-snap (www.itksnap.org). The neuroradiologists were blinded to each other's results. Gliomas were segmented on each MRI slice. We defined ROIs of the LGGs as areas of the MRI images that exhibited abnormal hyperintense signals. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was used to assess whether the segmentation results of the two doctors were significantly different. No difference was defined as ICC >0.8. In the absence of a difference, each patient would obtain a segmentation result from one of the two neuroradiologists randomly.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!