The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Pannoramic 250 digital slide scanner

Manufactured by 3DHISTECH
Sourced in Hungary

The Pannoramic 250 is a digital slide scanner produced by 3DHISTECH. It is designed for high-throughput, high-resolution scanning of glass microscope slides. The device captures digital images of the slides, which can then be viewed and analyzed on a computer.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

7 protocols using pannoramic 250 digital slide scanner

1

Histological Analysis of Rat Eye Development

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Eyes were collected at a range of time points from P5 to 3-month-old control and Crb1 mutant rats (n = 2–4/age/group). For morphological analysis, eyes were enucleated and fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde in phosphate buffered saline (PBS) for 20 min at room temperature. After fixation, the eyes were dehydrated for 30 min in 30, 50, 70, 90 and 99% ethanol. Subsequently, the eyes were embedded in Technovit 7100 (Kulzer, Wehrheim, Germany) and sectioned (3 μm) as previously described [39 ]. Slides were dried, counterstained with 0.5% toluidine blue and mounted under coverslips using Entellan (Merk, Darmstadt, Germany). Eye sections were scanned using a Pannoramic 250 digital slide scanner (3DHISTECH Ltd., Budapest, Hungary) and images were processed with CaseViewer 2.1 (3DHISTECH Ltd., Budapest, Hungary).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Intracerebral Injection and Diffusion of CDNF

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
In the diffusion experiment (Fig. 1), naïve rats received a single unilateral intrastriatal injection of CDNF (10 μg in 4 μl) (human recombinant CDNF, Batch 00400, 9.6 µg/µl, Biovian, Turku, Finland).The injection speed was 0.5 μl/min with Hamilton syringe (0.46 mm). The needle was left in place for 4 min after each injection to allow diffusion and to minimize the backflow of the solution. Rats were perfused either 2 or 6 h after injection.

Diffusion of CDNF in rat brain tissue. Rats were injected with 10 μg CDNF or PBS injection into the same injection site as used in QA model. Immunohistochemical staining of CDNF illustrating the distribution of the neurotrophic protein in frontal cortex (FCTX), striatum (STR), dorsal striatum, hippocampus and substantia nigra (SN) in 2 or 6 h after single intrastriatal injection. The black arrow indicates the placement of intrastriatal injection. Images were taken with Pannoramic 250 digital slide scanner (3DHISTECH, Hungary).

+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Histological Analysis of Hemorrhagic Brain Tissue

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
After 180 days of VEM, the animals were injected with an overdose of sodium pentobarbital (200 mg/kg, i.p.) and transcardially perfused with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) followed by 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA, pH 7.4). After 24 h post-fixation in PFA, the brains were cryoprotected in increasing sucrose solutions (10–20–30%), snap-frozen in isopentane and liquid nitrogen (−196°C) and stored at −80°C. Coronal cryosections (40 μm) of hemorrhage-containing brain tissue were made using a cryostat (Leica, Germany). Every 10th section (every 400 μm) was used for cresyl violet and hemosiderin stain. For each animal three sections were processed with immunofluorescence staining to analyze expression of astrocytic markers GFAP and vimentin and microglial marker Iba1. All slices were digitized using a Pannoramic 250 digital slide scanner (3DHistech, Hungary) at 20× magnification and analyzed using ImageJ.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Quantifying Tumor-Infiltrating CD8+ Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Immunohistochemical analysis of tumor samples was performed as described previously.13 Frozen sections of tumor tissues (10 μm) were stained with rat antibodies against mouse CD8 (KT-15; Santa Cruz biotechnology, Dallas, TX), followed by incubation with Histofine Simple Mouse MAXPO for Rat (Nichirei Biosciences, Tokyo, Japan), and visualized with the Vectastain ABC Elite Kit (Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA) and AEC+ substrate-chromogen (Dako), and counterstained with hematoxylin. Positive cells were quantified using a Pannoramic 250 digital slide scanner (3DHISTECH, Budapest, Hungary) at × 200 magnification.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Detecting mHtt Aggregates in Brain Sections

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
We used EM48 antibody to detect mHtt aggregates, which targets the N-terminal region of human Htt (amino acids 1-212). The analysis was performed on the paraffinized brain Sections (10 µm) with the ABC method. After deparaffinisation, antigen retrieval and endogenous peroxidase inactivation, sections were incubated in TBS-T (1×TBS, 0.1% Tween20). Nonspecific binding was blocked by BSA (4% BSA, 0.3% triton-×-100, PBS). The sections were incubated with mouse EM48 (1:100, Millipore #MAB5374) for 48 h at 4 °C. After several washes in TBS-T (1×TBS, 0.1% Tween-20), the sections were incubated with goat anti-mouse secondary antibodies (1:200, Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA), followed by incubation for 30 min with ABC complex. Staining was developed with the DAB method with DAB substrate kit (SK-4100, Vector), then sections were dehydrated and mounted using cover slips. All sections were scanned with a Pannoramic 250 digital slide scanner (3DHISTECH, Hungary). Three to six striatal brain sections were used to measure immunoreactivity, which was quantitated relative to the control group (N171-82Q-PBS). Healthy animals (WT) did not have mHtt aggregates and were not used in the analysis. Aiforia Create version 5.0 (Aiforia Technologies Oy) was used to analyse EM48-immunoreactivity and inclusions.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Quantifying Osteoclasts in Bone Metastasis Model

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Femurs resected from control mice and LLC-bearing mice on day 25 postinoculation of LLC cells and sham operation, respectively, were fixed with 4% PFA (3M Science) for 7 days. Then, the femurs were decalcified in 14% EDTA (pH 7.0) and embedded in paraffin. Then, 4.0-micrometer-thick sections were prepared using Leica RM2255 microtome (Leica Biosystems, Wetzlar, Germany) and used for TRAP staining (GENOSS, Suwon, Korea) and hematoxylin counterstaining (GENOSS, Suwon, Korea). The stained sections were observed and images were captured using Pannoramic 250 digital slide scanner (3D Histech, Hungary). TRAP-positive multinucleated osteoclasts in the metaphyseal area, located 0.5 mm proximal to the growth plate and 0.5 mm away from the intracortical surface, were counted and the number of TRAP-positive multinucleated osteoclasts normalized to the bone perimeter were analyzed for each sample. The bone perimeter was measured using ImageJ software v 1.53e (NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Histological Analysis of Aortic and Liver Tissue

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The aortic roots of male mice were embedded in Tissue-Tek O.C.T. compound (Tissue-Tek, Sakura Finetek USA Inc, Torrance, CA, USA), frozen in isopentane on dry ice and stored at -70°C until further use. Transverse sections of the aortic root (8 µm) were cut and stained with Oil Red O, Masson's Trichrome and Mac3 and iNOS (Abcam) primary antibodies for the evaluation of lipid accumulation, collagen deposition, macrophage density and macrophage polarisation, respectively, as described previously (Rinne et al. 2014) (link). For liver histology, a transverse piece of the left lobe was embedded in O.C.T. compound (Tissue-Tek) for cryosectioning. Liver sections were thereafter stained with Oil Red O. The stained sections were scanned using Pannoramic 250 digital slide scanner (3DHISTECH Ltd., Budapest, Hungary) and quantified (4 sections/slide/mouse) using image analysis software (ImageJ, National Institutes of Health) as previously described (Rinne et al. 2014 (link)(Rinne et al. , 2017)) (link).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!