The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

23 protocols using digoxigenin rna labeling mix

1

In Situ Hybridization of Shh Introns

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Antisense riboprobes that hybridize the intron 1 and 2 of the nascent RNA of Shh were synthesized as previously reported53 (link). Briefly, two plasmid vectors containing the intron 1 and 2 of Shh were linearized with NotI and SpeI, respectively. RNA labeling was performed with digoxigenin RNA labeling mix (Roche) by in vitro transcription with T3 and T7 RNA polymerases (promega), respectively. The fragment size of the riboprobes was reduced to 500 bp or fewer by alkaline hydrolysis. Four micrometers paraffin sections of mouse embryos were deparaffinized in xylene. The sections were rehydrated and treated with 1 μg/ml Proteinase K. After dehydration through ethanol series, they were hybridized with riboprobes overnight at 65 °C. Monoclonal anti-Digoxigenin (Sigma) and Alexa488-conjugated anti-mouse IgG (Thermo Fisher Scientific) were used as primary and second antibodies. Nuclei were stained with 1 μg/ml of DAPI (Thermo Fisher Scientific).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Gene Expression Analysis in Zebrafish

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Scl, cmyb, mpx, dhx15, gata1, and hbae1 were cloned from zebrafish cDNA and inserted to pGEM T Easy Vector (Promega) for antisense RNA synthesis. Probe plasmids lmo2, pu.1, lyz, dab2, and ephrinb2 were obtained from Tao Peter Zhong. Rag1 probe plasmid was a kind gift from Feng Liu. Antisense RNA probes were transcribed in vitro by T3, T7, or Sp6 polymerase (Sigma‐Aldrich) with Digoxigenin RNA Labeling Mix (Roche). Primers for probe plasmid construction are listed in Table S1.
WISH was carried out according to the standard protocol.26 (link)
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

In situ Hybridization of ap-AKH in A. californica

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A 243-nt antisense digoxigenin-labeled riboprobe was generated from the full-length cDNA of ap-AKH using the digoxigenin RNA labeling mix (Roche, Indianapolis, MN). The riboprobe was used at 200 ng/ml in a standard colorimetric ISH and visualized with nitro-blue-tetrazolium/5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl-phosphate as previously described [29] (link). All sections were counterstained with methyl green, and neurons positive for ap-AKH were counted as described above for counting ap-AKH-ir neurons. ISH was performed on three separate A. californica, and each time yielded similar results.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Fluorescence in situ Hybridization for NPM

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The fluorescence in situ hybridization experiments were performed57 (link) using a DNA fragment of ~500 bp corresponding to the coding region of mouse NPM. The fragment was amplified by PCR using the following primers fused to either a T7 or T3 minimal promoter sequence: NPM forward, 5′-TAA TAC GAC TCA CTA TAG GGA CGG TTG AAG TGT GGT TCA G -3′, and NPM reverse, 5′-AAT TAA CCC TCA CTA AAG GAA CTT GGC TTC CAC TTT GG -3′. The PCR product was used as the template for in vitro transcription of the NPM probe needed for fluorescence in situ hybridization. The antisense (T3) and sense (T7) probes were prepared using digoxigenin-RNA labeling mix (Roche Diagnostics). The RNA probes were quantified, denatured, and incubated with permeabilized cells57 (link). After the hybridization, the cells were used for immunofluorescence to detect HuR57 (link).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Zebrafish Caudal Fin Regeneration

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Zebrafish, 6-8 months of age, were used for caudal fin amputations. Fish were anaesthetized in tricaine and amputations were made by using a razor blade, removing half of the fin [27 (link)]. Animals were allowed to regenerate for 2 days in water kept at 31-33 °C; these temperatures facilitate more rapid regeneration than more commonly used temperatures of 25–28 °C [39 (link)]. Then, fish were anaesthetized, and the fin regenerate was removed for analyses. lef1 probes were transcribed in vitro by T3 polymerase (Ambion) with Digoxigenin RNA Labeling Mix (Roche). In situ hybridization of zebrafish fins was performed as previously described [40 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Circadian Rhythm Expression Profiling

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Larvae previously exposed to temperature or light cycles were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde in PBS at different time points during 24 hours. In situ hybridization was carried out as previously described [31 ] using the zfaanat2 probe [20 ] that was labeled with digoxigenin RNA-labeling mix (Roche).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Synthesis and Validation of Sema3D/F Probes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For Sema3D (NM_205373.1, 1031–1792) and Sema3F (NM_204258.1, 721–1440), probe templates were created from chicken cDNA using primer sequences as reported earlier (Bao & Jin, 2006 (link); Jin et al., 2006 (link)). The amplicons were inserted into the Topo TA vector. Probes were transcribed from the plasmid templates using T7 or T3 RNA polymerase (Promega) and Digoxigenin-RNA labeling mix (Roche). The probes were purified using RQ1 DNase (Promega) and precipitated with LiCl and ethanol. Electrophoresis (1% agarose gel) was used to check the quality of the probes. RNAscope® Nrp2 (Cat #501191) and PlxnA1 (Cat #506111) probes were ordered from Advanced Cell Diagnostics.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

RT-PCR and In Situ Hybridization for Gene Expression

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A fragment of each gene was amplified by RT-PCR using cDNA obtained from gonads as the template. The sequences of primers are listed in Table S6. RNA extraction and cDNA synthesis were performed as described earlier. The CDS sequence of chicken NR5A1 was inserted in a pBluescript SK. The PCR products of other genes were subcloned using the pGEM T-Easy Vector System (Promega, Madison, WI, USA). cDNA clones were labelled using Digoxigenin RNA Labeling Mix (Roche, Basel, Switzerland) and T7, SP6 or T3 RNA polymerase (MAXIscript; Thermo Fisher Scientific). Hybridization to serial frozen sections was performed as described previously23 (link). The incubation temperature was modified to 65–70 °C. Images were captured using a cooled CCD camera (DS-Ri1; Nikon, Tokyo, Japan) mounted on a Nikon ECLIPSE E800 microscope and were analysed using NIS ELEMENTS (Nikon).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Whole Mount In Situ Hybridization Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Whole mount in situ hybridization was performed using standard procedures (Thisse and Thisse, 2008 (link)). The embryos were fixed in 4% PFA (Sigma Aldrich) and dehydrated in methanol before being hybridized with riboprobes that were generated from PCR products with the following primers: kdrl-fwd 5′-TGGCAGGATTCACTTTGAGTGG-3′ and kdrl-rev 5′-TAATACGACTCACTATAGGGTAGTGTAGGGCTCAATCCGCAG-3′; dlg4a-fwd: 5′-CGGCTACACATGAACAAGCAGC-3′ and dlg4a-rev: 5′-TAATACGACTCACTATAGGGGACGCTCCCTGGTGGGAATCC-3′; dlg4b-fwd: 5′-CATATGGACATGTCTGATTACCCG-3′ and dlg4b-rev: 5′-TAATACGACTCACTATAGGGACGGCCTGCGACAGAAAACC-3′; magi3a-fwd: 5′-CCTGCCAGCCGAGAAGACAGG-3′ and magi3a-rev: 5′-TAATACGACTCACTATAGGGCTTTCCAGGGACCTGGAGTTATGG-3′; magi3b-fwd: 5′-CGCTCAAGAGGAAGAAACACTGG-3′ and magi3b-rev: 5′-TAATACGACTCACTATAGGGTCCAACAGTAATCCACTCTCCTCC-3′
The probes were then transcribed with a T7 RNA polymerase (Roche) and digoxigenin-RNA labeling mix (Roche) and an anti-DIG AP (1:5000) and NBT/BCIP substrate (Roche) was used to detect them. The embryos were cleared with Benzyl Alcohol/Benzyl Benzoate (BA/BB) before being transferred into glycerol for storage and imaging using a Leica M165 stereoscope.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Mouse BDNF DNA Plasmid Characterization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Mouse BDNF DNA plasmid (accession #X55573) was kindly donated by Dr. Stanley Watson, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor. The DNA sequence was validated by comparison to Bdnf reference sequence using FinchTV software (Geospiza, Inc., Seattle, WA, United States). Sense and antisense strands were generated by in vitro transcription with the AMBION Maxiscript T7 kit (Ambion, Waltham, MA, United States), labeled with digoxigenin RNA labeling mix (Roche, Basel, Switzerland), and purified with mini columns according to the manufacturer’s protocol. (Roche, Basel, Switzerland).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!