The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Standard operant chambers

Manufactured by Harvard Apparatus
Sourced in United States

Standard operant chambers are laboratory equipment used to study animal behavior. They provide a controlled environment for observing and recording the responses of animals to various stimuli or conditions. The chambers typically include a response device, such as a lever or a nose poke, and a system to deliver reinforcements, such as food or water, in response to the animal's actions. The core function of these chambers is to facilitate the systematic observation and analysis of animal behavior within a controlled setting.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

14 protocols using standard operant chambers

1

Operant Conditioning Chamber Setup

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Training and experiments took place using 8 standard operant chambers (Coulbourn Instruments) controlled by GraphicState 3.0 software and housed in sound-attenuating cabinets. Chambers were equipped with a house light, food magazine recessed into a side wall, and three nosepoke apertures located on the wall opposite the food magazine. A speaker for delivering auditory cues was located above the food magazine. A retractable lever was located to one side of the food magazine (left or right counterbalanced among subjects) with a white cue light above the lever. Subjects were initially trained to retrieve sucrose pellets (45 mg, Bio-Serv) from the food magazine over 2 daily sessions consisting of 50 pellets delivered on a variable interval schedule (mean = 60 s).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Operant Chamber Setup for Behavioral Experiments

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Strategy shifting took place in standard operant chambers (Coulbourn Instruments, Whitehall, PA) that were enclosed in sound-attenuating cubicles. The cubicles were equipped with fans that provided ventilation and masked extraneous noise. One wall of each operant chamber was equipped with a centrally located food trough outfitted on either side with retractable levers that were equidistant (87 mm) from the trough. White cue lights were located above each lever and a 2.9 kHz Sonalert speaker was located directly above the food trough. A white houselight was located near the chamber ceiling on the wall opposite the nosepoke ports. Graphic State software (v3.1; Coulbourn Instruments) was used for automated chamber control and data collection.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Operant Ethanol Self-Administration in Adult MS Rats

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Adult MS rats (n=10) were trained to lever press for ethanol starting at P60–P70. The training described below takes approximately 4 weeks, followed by 21 days of testing. Standard operant chambers [Coulbourn Instruments, Inc., Lehigh Valley, PA] were enclosed in an isolated box. The operant apparatus contained two levers, two dipper manipulanda, triple cue lights over each lever, and a house light. The dipper cup size was 0.1 mL. The Coulbourn Graphic State “3” operant software was used to capture lever presses for the alcohol. Rats were trained to orally self-administer EtOH daily for 1h under a fixed ratio [FR] 1 schedule employing the sucrose fading technique (Harvey et al., 2002 (link)). After a period of stabilization on the FR1 schedule, the response requirement was then increased to an FR4 schedule, i.e., the rat had to press levers 4 times in order to receive the reward. For each schedule, responding was considered stable when responses were within ± 20% of the average responses for five consecutive days. Once responding was stabilized at FR4, the rats were allowed access every day over a 3-week period using a 5-day access and 2-day resting modifications of well-established procedures (June and Eiler, 2007 , Liu et al., 2011 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Operant Alcohol Self-Administration in Rats

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The animals were trained to lever press for ethanol beginning at P60-P70. This experiment was carried out in a total of 30 SD rats, with 10 rats per group. The training to lever press for a reward (10% sucrose) first on the FR1 schedule, and then on FR4, took place for approximately 4 weeks, was followed by the sucrose fading technique, and stabilization on 10% EtOH. Once responding was animals were stable on FR4 (within 20% from day-to-day), 21 days of testing commenced. Standard operant chambers (Coulbourn Instruments, Inc., PA) were enclosed in an isolated box. The operant apparatus contained two levers, two dipper manipulanda, triple cue lights over each lever, and a house light. The dipper cup size was 0.1 ml. The Coulbourn Graphic State “3” operant software was used to capture lever presses for the alcohol. Rats were allowed access to the chamber for 2 × 30 mins with a 30-minute rest period between sessions, over a 3-week period using a 5-day access and 2-day resting modifications of well-established procedures [53 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Threat Conditioning and Extinction in Rats

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Threat conditioning and extinction tasks were performed as previously described (Martínez-Canabal et al., 2019 (link)). Briefly, auditory threat conditioning and extinction was performed in standard operant chambers (Coulbourn Instruments) located inside sound-attenuating boxes (Med Associates) in an isolated testing room. The floor of the operant chambers consisted of stainless-steel bars that could deliver electric foot-shocks. Between experiments shock grids, floor trays and walls were cleaned with soap and water. On day 1, rats were subjected to threat conditioning consisting of five tone presentations (30 s, 4 kHz, 75 dB) that co-terminated each one with a foot-shock (0.5 s, 0.6 mA). On day 2, after conditioning, rats received extinction training consisting of fifteen presentations of unreinforced tones. On day 3, rats were tested for memory retrieval with two tone-alone presentations. In all sessions, the interval between tones was variable with an averaged 2 min.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Operant Conditioning Apparatus Setup

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Behavioral testing was conducted in eight standard operant chambers (Coulbourn Instruments). Chambers were contained in sound-attenuating cubicles, and were computer controlled through Graphic State 4.0 software (Coulbourn Instruments). Locomotor activity was monitored via infrared motion detectors installed on the ceilings of the chambers. Each operant chamber was equipped with a food trough containing a photobeam sensor to detect nosepokes into the trough, two retractable levers (one on each side of the food trough), a feeder installed on the outside wall of the chamber and connected to the food trough to deliver 45 mg purified ingredient rodent food pellets (Test Diet 5TUL), and a stainless steel floor grate connected to a shock generator that could deliver scrambled footshocks. Each sound-attenuating cubicle included a house light mounted on the rear wall (outside of the operant chamber).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Operant Conditioning Chambers for Alcohol Studies

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The present study used 10 standard operant chambers (Coulbourn Instruments, Allentown, PA) enclosed in sound attenuating cubicles (Coulbourn Instruments). Each chamber was equipped with two levers on either side of an access area into which a dipper (0.1 mL capacity) could protrude. The dipper rested in a small reservoir of alcohol fluid prior to activation. Head entries were tabulated using infrared sensors located in the dipper access area. Operant chambers were equipped with a house light, a dipper access light, and two sets of three-colored cue lights, one above each lever. Stimulus parameters and data tabulation were programmed using Graphic State Notation (version 4.0).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Operant Conditioning of Alcohol and Sucrose in Rats

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Animals were tested in 11 standard operant chambers [Coulbourn Instruments, Inc., Lehigh Valley, PA] enclosed in an isolated chamber as previously described ((Liu et al., 2011 (link)). The operant apparatus contained two levers, two dipper manipulanda, triple cue lights over each lever, and a house light. The dipper cup size which contained the 10% (v/v) alcohol or 3% (w/v) sucrose reinforcers was 0.1 mL. The Coulbourn Graphic State “3” operant software was used.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Operant Conditioning in Rats

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Rats were trained and tested in standard operant chambers (Coulbourn Instruments; Whitehall, PA, USA) that were housed inside sound-attenuating cubicles. The cubicles were equipped with fans that provided ventilation and masked extraneous noise. One wall of each operant chamber was equipped with a centrally located food trough outfitted on either side with a response module (retractable levers in Exp. 1, Exp. 2; recessed nosepoke ports in Exp. 3) that were equidistant (87 mm) from the trough. White cue lights were located above each response module and a white houselight was located near the chamber ceiling on the wall opposite the food trough. Sessions were recorded and analyzed using Graphic State software (Coulbourn Instruments; Allentown, PA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Operant Chambers for Rat Self-Administration

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
MA self-administration occurred in standard operant chambers (Coulbourn Instruments, Whitehall, PA). Each chamber contained two nose poke operandums (2 cm from the floor), an optical lickometer, a house light, a stimulus light, and a sound cue (500 Hz, 10 dB above background). The two nose poke operanda were positioned on the front wall of the chamber, with the optical lickometer positioned between them. The stimulus light and sound cue were located directly above the active nose poke hole. The house light was located on the rear wall of the chamber and, except for 20 s timeout periods, the house light remained on while rats were inside the operant chamber. Each chamber was housed in a soundproof isolation cubicle and controlled by an IBM compatible computer interfaced with a data collection program (Graphic State, Coulbourn Instruments).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!