The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Activated molecular sieves

Manufactured by Merck Group
Sourced in Italy

Activated molecular sieves are a type of highly porous and adsorbent material used in various laboratory applications. They are crystalline aluminosilicate structures with a uniform pore size, capable of selectively adsorbing and separating molecules based on their size and polarity. Activated molecular sieves are often used for the removal of water and other impurities from organic solvents, gases, and other materials, as well as for the purification and drying of various substances.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

7 protocols using activated molecular sieves

1

PDMS Patch Conditioning and Thermal Desorption

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
PDMS patches (20 × 15 × 50 mm) were cut from a single sheet (Goodfellow Cambridge Ltd, Huntingdon, UK). The PDMS patches were conditioned as described in Xu et al. (2010) (link), transferred directly into clean thermal desorption (TD) tubes (Markes international Ltd, Llantrisant, UK) and capped. The TD tubes were stored at room temperature within an airtight glass container filled with a layer of activated molecular sieves (Sigma Aldrich Ltd, Dorset, UK). The TD tubes were used for sampling and analysis within 48 h of conditioning. A random selection of the TD tubes (1:5) were analysed to confirm that the batch was clean and free from contaminants before use.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Anionic Polymerization of Cyclic Siloxanes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All glassware was baked at 110 °C overnight and immediately transferred to a nitrogen environment glove box for all anionic polymerizations. All reactions were carried out at room temperature unless otherwise stated. D3 monomer was purified by sublimation on a Schlenk line. Activated molecular sieves (4 Angstrom, Sigma-Aldrich) were used to dry cyclohexane for at least 48 hours before usage. Styrene was purified by vacuum distillation at 40 °C and stored at −80 °C in the presence of Activated molecular sieves.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Poloxamer-based polyurethane synthesis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Poloxamer 407 [P407, poly(ethylene oxide)-poly(propylene oxide)-poly(ethylene oxide) triblock copolymer, M¯n 12600 Da, 70% w/w poly(ethylene oxide)], 1,4-cyclohexanedimethanol (CDM), 1,6-hexamethylene diisocyanate (HDI), and dibutyltin dilaurate were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich, Italy. Before use, reagents were treated according to the protocol proposed by Pontremoli et al. (2018) (link) to remove residual water. Briefly, P407 was dried under reduced pressure (approximately 200 mbar) at 100°C for 8 h and then cooled down at room temperature under vacuum; HDI was distilled under reduced pressure; CDM was stored at room temperature (RT) in a desiccator; 1,2-dichloroethane (DCE) was poured over activated molecular sieves (3 Å, Sigma Aldrich, Italy) and maintained overnight under nitrogen atmosphere. All solvents were purchased from Carlo Erba Reagents (Italy) in analytical grade.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Synthesis of Polyurethane Elastomers

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The commercially available triblock co-polymer Poloxamer® 407 (P407, poly(ethylene oxide)-poly(propylene oxide)-poly(ethylene oxide), PEO-PPO-PEO, Mn¯ = 12,600 Da) was purchased from Sigma Aldrich (Milan, Italy) and used as macrodiol for PEU synthesis after drying at 100 °C for 8 h and cooling at 40 °C under a vacuum (approx. 200 mbar). Furthermore, 1,6-hexamethylene diisocyanate (HDI) and N-Boc serinol were also purchased from Sigma Aldrich (Milan, Italy) and used as a diisocyanate and chain extender during PEU synthesis, respectively. Before use, HDI was distilled under reduced pressure to remove moisture and stabilizers, while N-Boc serinol was stored in a desiccator under a vacuum. The organotin compound dibutyltin dilaurate (DBTDL) was purchased from Sigma Aldrich (Milan, Italy) and added in a catalytic amount to catalyze the PEU synthesis reaction. The synthesis was performed using 1,2-dichloroethane (DCE, Carlo Erba Reagents, Milan, Italy) as a solvent. Before the synthesis procedure, DCE was anhydrified over activated molecular sieves (4 Å, Sigma Aldrich, Milan, Italy, activation at 120 °C overnight) under nitrogen atmosphere overnight. All other solvents required for PEU synthesis were purchased from Carlo Erba Reagents (Milan, Italy) in analytical grade and used as received.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Solvent-Based Polyurethane Synthesis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Before the synthesis, reagents (i.e., macrodiol, diisocyanate, and chain extender) were treated to remove residual water content and stabilizers according to the methods proposed by Pontremoli, Boffito et al. [18 (link)]. Briefly, Poloxamer® 407 (P407, poly(ethylene oxide)-poly(propylene oxide)-poly(ethylene oxide) PEO-PPO-PEO triblock copolymer, Mn 12,600 Da, 70% w/w PEO) was dried at 100 °C for 8 h while keeping low pressure (i.e., 200 mbar) and then cooled down at room temperature (RT) under vacuum. 1,6-hexamethylene diisocyanate (HDI) was distilled under reduced pressure, meanwhile 1,4-cyclohexanedimethanol (CDM) was kept at RT under vacuum in a dessicator. Anhydrous 1,2-dichloroethane (DCE) was prepared by pouring the solvent over activated molecular sieves (3 Å, Sigma Aldrich, Milan, Italy) under constant nitrogen flow until use. P407, HDI, CDM, and dibutyltin dilaurate (DBTDL) as catalyst were purchased from Sigma Aldrich, Milan, Italy, while solvents were purchased from CarloErba reagents (Cornaredo, Italy) in their analytical grade.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Synthesis of Silica-Based Nanomaterials

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
β-cyclodextrin hydrate (β-CD) (99 %, Acros Organics), tetraethyl orthosilicate (TEOS) (≥99 %, Merck), (3-aminopropyl)triethoxysilane (APTES) (≥99 %, Merck), N,N′-carbonyldiimidazole (CDI) (≥98 %, Merck), and cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTMABr) (≥97 %, Merck) were used as purchased, and no further purification was performed. Aqueous ammonia (25 %), ethanol (96 %), and hydrochloric acid (37 %) were purchased from Reakhim and used without additional purification. Acetone (extra pure, Merck) and N,N′-dimethylformamide (DMF) (pure analytical, Reakhim) were dried for 48 h before utilization with activated molecular sieves (0.3 nm, Merck). Benzene (pure analytical, Reakhim) was used to prepare benzene solutions in water. Distilled water was used in all experiments.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Quantifying Cathode Carbonate Content

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To determine the carbonate content of the SSB cathode composite after mixing and after the initial cycle, the solid electrolyte had to be removed, as the strong H2S evolution when using the acid titration setup (more details below) did not allow for accurate measurement of CO2. Hence, ~30 mg of either cathode composite or cycled SSB pellet were dispersed in 3 mL of N-methylformamide (Sigma Aldrich; NMF), able to dissolve the solid electrolyte while leaving Li2CO3 unaffected. The In anode was removed in the case of the cycled SSB pellet before dissolving in NMF. The NMF was carefully dried over activated molecular sieves (Merck); the H2O content was determined to be ~2 ppm by Karl-Fischer titration. After pouring of the solution and repeated washing with NMF, the powder was dried for at least 24 h in a vacuum prior to acid titration measurement. The NCM622 cathode material with an artificially grown Li2 13 CO3 surface layer served as reference sample and was treated in the same way as described above (to ensure the carbonate is not affected by the NMF).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!