The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

8 protocols using jet stream electrospray ionization source

1

Quantification of THC in Mouse Brain

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Pooled homogenized THC-free mouse brain samples (n = 6–8) were used for the development and validation. Experiments were carried out with a 1290 Infinity II ultrahigh performance liquid chromatography (UHPLC) system coupled to a 6495 iFunnel triple Quad mass spectrometer equipped with a JetStream electrospray ionization source (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA). A Kinetex EVOC18 100A 3 × 100 mm (2.6 μm) column was selected. Sample analysis in positive ionization mode was performed using as mobile phase water with 0.1% formic acid (solvent A) and acetonitrile with 0.1% formic acid (solvent B) with elution gradient mode. The flow rate was 0.5 ml/min; injection volume was 5 μl, and the column temperature was maintained at 30 °C. The calibration curve was prepared by spiking 20 μl of standard working solution to obtain brain THC final concentrations of 8–2000 ng/g. Quality control samples (QCs) were prepared by spiking brain samples containing 60 and 1000 ng/g as the final THC concentration.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Quantification of Antibiotic Residues by LC-MS/MS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The antibiotic residue level was performed by using high performance liquid chromatography coupled with triple‐quadrupole mass spectrometer (LC–MS/MS). In this particular study, HPLC of an Agilent 1290 Infinity II system (Agilent Technologies Ltd.) interfaced to an Agilent 6470 LC/TQ/ triple‐quadruple mass spectrometer (Freitas & Ramos, 2014 (link)). The HPLC–MS/MS equipped with an Agilent jet stream electrospray ionization source, which was operated in positive mode (AJS‐ESI+) and controlled by Mass Hunter software (Doyuk & Dost, 2023 (link)).
The antibiotics separation was chromatographically using on Phenomenex Synergi hydro‐RP, (4.6 mm × 150 mm; 4 µm, 80 Å dimensions) column with a guard cartridge system (4 × 3.0 mm2). The mobile phase was a binary gradient mobile phase with a flow rate set at 1.0 mL/min for a total run time of 17 min (Table 1). Methanol with 0.1% FA (Mobile phase‐A) and acetonitrile with 0.1% (v/v) (Mobile phase‐B) were used.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Quantitative LC-MS/MS Analysis of Metformin

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
LC-MS/MS system was performed using an Agilent 1260 Infinity HPLC and HiP ALS (Autosampler) coupled with Agilent 6460 triple quadrupole mass spectrometer with a Jet Stream electrospray ionization source (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA). All data were acquired employing Agilent Mass Hunter software 7.0. Separation of Metformin from tissue or plasma samples was achieved at ambient temperature on Waters XBridge C18 column (3.0 x 50 mm, 3.5 μm). The mobile phases consist of 2 mM ammonium acetate buffer in water as mobile phase A and 100% acetonitrile as mobile phase B in a gradient run at a flow rate of 0.35 ml/min. The run started initially at 5% mobile phase B for 1.0 minute, then from 5% to 95% mobile phase B for 1.0 minute, and 95% mobile phase B for 1.0 minute and post-run staying at 5% for 1.0 minute. The total run time is 3.0 minutes, post-run 1.0 minute, and the MS scan window was set between 0.5–1.5 minutes. The mass spectrometer was operated in a positive mode using multiple reaction morning (MRM) with an ion spray voltage at +3.5 kV, the gas temperature at 325 °C, drying gas at flow-rate of 8 Lmin−1, nozzle voltage 500 V. The optimized MRM, fragmentor, and collision energy parameters are presented in S1 Table.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Quantifying Ticagrelor Removal with Sorbent

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
An Agilent 6490 QQQ with I-Funnel technology fitted with a Jet Stream electrospray ionization source (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, California), coupled with an Agilent 1290 UHPLC system was used. A Phenomenx Kinetex C18 (Torrance, California) 2.1 × 50 mm, 1.8-μm particle size was used for chromatography.
All computations regarding ticagrelor removal were performed using liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectroscopy assay-measured concentrations. Measurements of concentrations in aliquots from same experiments were performed in same assay batch ensuring accurate whole blood and plasma ticagrelor percentage sorbent-removal rates.
To assess how much albumin was adsorbed by the 2 sorbents, BSA concentration measurement was performed using the BSA absorption properties at 595 nm on a Shimadzu Corporation UV-2401PC spectrometer (Kyoto, Japan), according to a method put forth by the University of Michigan and attached here (Supplemental Appendix).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Quantification of Pharmaceuticals and Personal Care Products

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Duplicate water samples from each site were collected in 500 mL amber glass bottles to measure concentrations of select PPCPs. Surrogate standards were added to the samples and extractions performed using Oasis HLB cartridges (Waters Corporation, Milford, MA) as described in Metcalfe et al. [36 (link)] and Garcia-Lor et al. [37 (link)] for the acidic and neutral PPCPs, and antidepressants, respectively. The extracts were reduced in volume under a gentle stream of nitrogen, reconstituted in 90:10 water:methanol, and isotopically labeled internal standards added. Analysis was carried out by liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry as described in Lajeunesse et al. [38 (link)] using a Poroshell 120 PFP column (2.1 x 100 mm x 2.7 μm) on an Agilent 1260 HPLC connected to a 6460 tandem mass spectrometer equipped with a Jet Stream electrospray ionization source (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA). Quantification was carried out using isotope dilution. The performance of the extraction method was verified using spike and recovery tests, and the average recoveries were 48.2% for norfluoxetine, 67.6% for fluoxetine and 81.8% to 94.0% for the remaining analytes, with percent relative standard deviation ranging from 3.0% to 12.9% for all compounds.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

LC-MS/MS Quantification of Oxidative DNA Lesions

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Enzymatic hydrolysis was performed for extracted DNA and RNA, as described by Noyon et al. [13] (link). Briefly, DNA and RNA were digested into nucleosides in the presence of internal standards (labeled 15N5-dGua and 5-fluorocytidine) using nuclease P1, PDE II, PDE I, alkaline phosphatase, and appropriated buffers. Thereafter, all samples were dried by vacuum centrifuge, dissolved in 50 μl aqueous mobile phase, and 10 μl was injected into LC/MSMS (in dynamic MRM positive mode) for the analysis of chloro(deoxy)cytidine (Cl-(d) Cyt) and 8-oxo(deoxy)guanosine (oxo-(d)Gua). Briefly, the analyses were performed using a LC/MS system from Agilent Technologies (Santa Clara, CA, USA): Agilent 1290 Infinity Binary -UHPLC system fitted to a mass spectrometer Agilent Jet Stream electrospray ionization source (AJS) -Triple Quadrupole (QqQ) 6490 series. Nucleoside separation was performed at 4 °C on Poroshell 120, EC-C18, 2.1 × 100 mm, 2.7-μm column, preceded by a Poroshell 120, EC-C18, 2.1 × 5 mm, 2.7-μm guard column, using an ammonium acetate 10 mM in water pH 5/methanol gradient. All these LC and MS parameters were detailed and validated in a previous article [13] (link). The results are expressed as the ratio Cl-dCyt/dCyt, Cl-Cyt/ Cyt, oxo-dGua/dGua, and oxo-Gua/Gua.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Liquid Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry Workflow

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Chromatography was performed on a 1260 Infinity liquid chromatography system. 15 μL of sample is injected on to a Zorbax SB-C18 column (4.6 x 250mm, 5 μm) held at 35 °C. The elution program was as follows: 0 min, 5% B; 110 min, 47% B; 120-125 min, 90% B; 126-135 min, 5% B. The flow rate was 1 mL/min, where A was 0.1% formic acid in water and B was 0.1% formic acid in acetonitrile. The LC system was coupled to an Agilent 6400 series Triple Quadrupole mass spectrometer equipped with an Agilent Jet Stream electrospray ionization source (AJS ESI), operating with 3.5 kV capillary voltage in both positive and negative modes (sheath gas temperature 250 °C, sheath gas flow rate 11 L/min, drying gas temperature 300°C, drying gas flow rate 5 L/min and nebulizer pressure 45 psi in both positive and negative mode). The fragmentor voltage is 135V. Positive and negative ionization mode mass spectra were simultaneously collected across the mass range of 100-1500 m/z. For MS/MS acquisition mode, the parameters were the same except that collision energy settings of 15V was used.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Quantifying Cellular Nucleosides via LC-MS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Enzymatic hydrolysis was performed for extracted DNA and RNA and dephosphorylation for free nucleotides from cytoplasm, as described in [22] (link).
Briefly, DNA and RNA were digested into nucleosides in the presence of internal standards (Labeled dGua ( 15 N5) and 5-fluorocytidine) using nuclease P1, PDE II, PDE I, alkaline phosphatase and appropriated buffers. Free nucleotides from cytoplasmic pool were dephosphorylated using alkaline phosphatase and appropriated buffers.
Thereafter, all samples were dried by vacuum centrifuge, dissolved in 50 µL aqueous mobile phase and 10 µL were injected into LC/MSMS (in dynamic MRM positive mode). Briefly, the analyses were performed using a LC/MS system from Agilent Technologies (Santa Clara, CA, USA): an Agilent 1290 Infinity Binary -UHPLC system fitted to a mass spectrometer Agilent Jet Stream electrospray ionization source (AJS) -Triple Quadrupole (QqQ) 6490 series. Nucleoside separation were performed at 4°C on Poroshell 120, EC-C18, 2.1 x 100 mm, 2.7 µm column, preceded by a Poroshell 120, EC-C18, 2.1 x 5 mm, 2.7 µm guard column, using an ammonium acetate 10 mM in water pH 5/methanol gradient. All these LC and MS parameters were detailed and validated in a previous article [22] (link).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!