The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

646 protocols using k alpha

1

Structural Investigation of NiS2 Layer

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
In this study, the structural investigation and phase identification of the as-prepared NiS2 layer was analyzed by X-ray powder diffraction (XRD) with a Panalytical X'Pert diffractometer using Cu Kα1 radiation at 45 kV and 40 mA. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) (QUANTA FEG250) was used for the surface morphology imaging of the obtained layers. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) was collected on K-Alpha (Themo Fisher Scientific, USA) with monochromatic X-ray Al K-Alpha radiation at pressure 10−9 mbar to determine the elemental composition and electronic states of the NiS2 layer. Raman analysis was performed on a confocal Raman microscope model WITec Alpha 300 RA under the laser excitation of 532 nm. Diffuse reflectance spectra were carried out using a UV/Vis/NIR spectrophotometer (Jasco V770) in the wavelength range 250–1000 nm.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Biochar Characterization: Morphology, Structure, and Surface Properties

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The surface morphology and element distributions of the biochars were analyzed using scanning electron microscopy–energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (SEM–EDS) with a Zeiss Supra 55VP instrument (Oregon, USA). The pore structure of the biochars was assessed by N2 adsorption at 77 K using a Nova 2200e surface area analyzer (Quantachrome Instruments, Florida, USA). The specific surface area (SSA) was calculated using the BET (Brunauer–Emmett–Teller) method, while the average pore volume was determined using the BJH (Barrett-Joyner-Halenda) method.
Zeta potential measurements were performed by dispersing the biochar in solutions ranging from pH 2.0 to 9.0, and the measurements were conducted using a Zetasizer instrument (Nano-ZS90, Malvern, UK). X-ray diffraction was performed using a computer-controlled diffractometer (D8 Advance, Bruker, Germany) with Al-Kα radiation (K-Alpha, Thermo Scientific, USA). Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) was conducted using a Nicolet 6700 instrument (USA) in the wavelength range of 400–4000 cm−1. X-ray photoelectron spectra were acquired using Al-Kα X-rays and a K-Alpha instrument (Thermo Fisher Scientific).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Comprehensive Characterization of Prepared Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
FT-IR spectra were measured on the Thermo SCIENTIFIC (NICOLET iS10). The samples were mixed with dry KBr to be analyzed and then scanned from 400 to 4000 cm−1. XRD patterns were collected on a PW 150 (Philips) using Ni-filtered Cu Kα radiation (λ = 1.540 Å) from 2θ of 4 to 80° at 40 kV. The morphology and the elements of the prepared samples were examined via SEM (Scanning Electron Microscopy) and EDX (Energy-Dispersive X-ray Spectroscopy) analysis with the JEOL (Model JSM-6510LV SEM) scanning electron microscope. Before the analysis the samples were coated with gold. To study the binding energies, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopic (XPS) was collected on K-alpha (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA) with monochromatic X-ray Al K-alpha radiation (−10 to 1350 eV). The surface area of the prepared catalysts was determined by nitrogen adsorption measurement apparatus at −196 °C after degassing at 250 °C for 4 h under a pressure of 10−5 torr.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Surface Modification and Characterization of Titanium

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The surface roughness of the control and NTAPP-treated groups was measured using an optical profilometer (Contour GT, Bruker, Tuscon, AZ, USA). The average of surface roughness (Ra and Sa values, μm) was confirmed using Vision64 software (Bruker, Tuscon, AZ, USA). Surface chemical composition of the control and NTAPP-treated groups was confirmed using X-ray photoelectron spectra (XPS; K-alpha, Thermo VG Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). A monochromatic Al Kα source was operated as the X-ray source (Al Kα line: 1486.6 Ev). The binding energy was referenced and calibrated to the C1s peak at 284.8 Ev. Detailed scans were taken for the C1s, O1s, N1s, and Ti2p regions. The contact angle and surface tension of the control and experimental groups were assessed using electro optics (Phoenix-300, SEO, Seoul, Korea). Specifically, 10 μL distilled polar (water) and non-polar (ethylene glycol, Sigma-Aldrich. St. Louis, MO, USA) liquid was dropped on the center of titanium specimens and left at room temperature. After 10 s, an image of the contact angle was measured and surface energy was calculated using Image XP (ver.5.9, SEO, Suwon, Korea) according to the Owens-Wendt method.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Comprehensive Physicochemical Characterization of SnAC–Fe3O4 Nanocomposites

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The samples' X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns were acquired with a RIGAKU, D/MAX-2500 powder diffractometer equipped with a Cu Kα radiation source (λ = 1.541 Å) operating at 40 kV and 300 mA. The structure and surface characteristics of the samples were investigated under transmission electron microscopy (TEM, 200 kV, Tecnai F20, Philips) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM-4700) equipped with an energy-dispersive X-ray spectrometer (EDX). The morphological analysis results, chemical compositions and binding energies were confirmed by Fourier transform infrared spectrophotometry (FT-IR, 4100, Jasco, Japan) and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS, K-alpha, Thermo VG Scientific). Fourier-transform infrared spectrophotometry (FT-IR, 4100, Jasco, Japan) was utilized to examine the vibration peaks of the SnAC–Fe3O4 nanocomposites before and after the annealing process. The Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET) surface area and average pore diameter were obtained from N2 adsorption/desorption isotherms using a fully automatic physisorption analyzer (ASAP 2020, Tristar). Also, the zeta potentials of the SnAC sample, Fe3O4 NPs, and SnAC–Fe3O4 nanocomposites were obtained by dynamic laser-light scattering (DLS, Zeta PALS).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

XPS Analysis of Dried Films

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Fully dried films were measured for XPS (K-alpha, Thermo VG Scientific) with a monochromic Al K-alpha source under a high vacuum condition of 10−9 Torr.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Structural and Compositional Analysis of Sb2S3 Thin Films

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
In this study, Cu Kα radiation at 40 kV and 40 mA was used to conduct X-ray diffraction (XRD) investigations for the structural and phase examination of the Sb2S3 layer. The morphology of the deposited layers was imaged using FEI Quanta 250 FEG scanning electron microscopy (SEM). X-Ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) data were collected using a K-ALPHA (Themo Fisher Scientific, USA) spectrometer to determine the chemical composition and electronic states of the Sb2S3 layer. The Raman study was carried out using a Witec Alpha 300 RA confocal Raman microscope with laser excitation at 532 nm. Optical measurements were performed using a UV/VIS/NIR spectrophotometer (Jasco V770).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Electrical characterization of CNT-FETs for cysteine sensing

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The electrical measurements of CNT-FETs were performed with HP 4145B (Agilent HP, US) semiconductor parameter analyser. For Cys sensing, the CCD1 modified CNT-FETs were placed in a pH 7.4 PBS solution, and the source-drain currents were measured under a 100 mV source-drain bias after adding Cys at different concentrations. Fluorescence and UV/vis absorption spectra were recorded with Shimadzu RF-5301PC and Shinco S-3100 spectrophotometers, respectively. Fourier transform infrared (FT-IR) spectra were performed with a NICOLETiS10 (Thermo scientific Korea Ltd.). Energy dispersive spectroscopy (EDS) data were taken on a JSM-6701F (JEOL, Ltd., Japan). X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) spectra were recorded with a K-alpha (Thermo VG Scientific, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Morphological and Electrochemical Characterization of CFO and CFO-Ni

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The morphological characteristics of CFO and CFO-Ni were examined by field emission scanning electron microscopy (FE-SEM, SU5000, Hitachi). To analyze the elemental composition, energy-dispersive X-ray (EDX) spectroscopy was conducted using FE-SEM (XL 30 S FEG, Philips, Netherlands) with a beam voltage of 10 kV. Both morphological and crystal properties of CFO and CFO-Ni were examined by high resolution transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM, Tecnai F20) operating at 200 kV. The crystal structures of CFO and CFO-Ni were confirmed by X-ray diffractometer (XRD, D/MX-200, Rigaku). The chemical states of both CuFeO2 and NiFe2O4 were analyzed by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS, K-alpha, Thermo VG Scientific). To analyze the redox reactions with Li, cyclic voltammetry (CV) analysis was conducted in the scan rate of 0.1 mV s−1 using the battery testing device (Maccor Series 4000, KOREA THERMO-TECH). To further investigate the internal cell resistances, impedance tests were carried out using 1-channel potentiostat (ZIVE SP1, Wonatech).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Characterization of Functionalized Graphene Quantum Dots

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
TEM images were acquired using a Titan G2 Cube 60-300 operation at 80 kV. XPS data were collected using K-alpha (Thermo VG Scientific) XPS. 13C NMR spectra were obtained with an Avance Neo (Prodigy, Bruker Biospin) 600-MHz spectrometer. Pristine GQDs, BA1-GQDs, and BA2-GQDs were dispersed in deuterium oxide, and TPE2-GQDs were dispersed in d6-DMSO to conduct NMR measurements. FTIR spectra were collected using a Nicolet iS50 (Thermo Fisher Scientific Instrument) FTIR spectrometer. SAXS measurements of GQD powders were performed using Nanopix SAXS instrument (Rigaku) with Cu-target x-ray. Ultraviolet-visible (UV-vis) absorption was measured using a SolidSpec-3700 UV-vis/near-infrared spectrophotometer. PL and PLE analyses were performed using an F-7000 (Hitachi) fluorospectrophotometer. Afterglow spectra were obtained with an F-7000 using a 40-Hz chopper with a gate delay time of 1 ms. TRES were also obtained using the same equipment by varying the gate delay time from 1 to 8000 μs. PF, RTP, and TADF decay lifetimes were collected via TCSPC using Fluorolog3 (Horiba). The absolute PL PLQYs were measured using Quantaurus-QY C13534-11 (Hamamatsu). The space charge–limited current behavior of GQDs was assessed with current-voltage characteristics using a Keithley 2635A source meter unit.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!