The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Cm12 electron microscope

Manufactured by Philips
Sourced in Netherlands

The CM12 electron microscope is a laboratory instrument designed for high-resolution imaging and analysis of samples at the nanoscale. It utilizes a focused beam of electrons to generate detailed images and provides information about the structural and chemical composition of materials. The CM12 is capable of magnifications up to 1,000,000x, enabling the examination of fine details and features not visible with traditional light microscopes.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

59 protocols using cm12 electron microscope

1

Negative Staining of yNap1–H2A–H2B Complex

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Four microliters of the yNap1–H2A–H2B sample (~0.1 mg ml−1) were loaded between the mica and carbon interface as described in (Franzetti et al, 2002). The sample was stained using 2% uranyl acetate pH 4.5 and air‐dried. Images were taken under low‐dose conditions in a CM12 Philips electron microscope working at 120 kV and with a nominal magnification of 40,000 using an Orius SC1000 CCD camera. A total of 1,200 individual particles were boxed from 30 images and CTF‐corrected (phase flipped) (Tosi et al, 2014). The crystal structure of yNap1–H2A–H2B was low‐pass filtered to 60 Å, reprojected into 372 equally spaced views, and used as the starting model for 3D classification. Because of the limited number of images and as the sample was negatively stained, only four projection matching cycles were carried out in SPIDER (Frank et al, 1996; Franzetti et al, 2002). Fitting of the crystal structure into the EM map was done with Chimera (Pettersen et al, 2004).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Bacterial Morphology Analysis by SEM

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
P. aeruginosa was grown to mid log (OD: 0.3 at 600 nm). Bacteria were washed in phosphate buffered saline (0.1 M PBS, pH 7.4) and then treated with cardiolipin and/or 3’,6-dinonylneamine for 1 hour at different concentrations. A suspension of bacterial cells was immobilized on poly-L-lysine coated coverslips for 10 min at room temperature. After washing in buffer–to remove the excess of free floating bacteria- coverslips were incubated in 1% glutaraldehyde in order to cross-link the fixed bacteria on poly-lysine coating. We further post-fixed the samples in 1% osmium tetroxide in cacodylate buffer for 2 h at 4°C and washed in water to eliminate traces of remaining osmium tetroxide. Samples were then dehydrated in graded series of ethanol, critical point dried and coated with 10 nm of gold. Samples were observed in a CM12 Philips electron microscope at 80 kV with the secondary electron detector. The i-TEM imaging software was used for the analysis of bacterial length. The asymmetrical division was calculated by measuring the differences in daughter lengths from the position of cell division.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Conventional EM Technique for Liver Ultrastructure

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A conventional EM technique was used as previously described [22] (link). Briefly, small liver slices were fixed for 2 h at 4°C in 1% glutaraldehyde in Millonig buffer (pH 7.3). The slices were post-fixed in 1% osmium tetroxide, embedded in Epon 812 and cut using an ultra-microtome. Ultra-thin sections were mounted on copper grids and contrasted with uranyl acetate and lead citrate. In addition to ultra-thin sections, sections of 1–3 μm (semi-thin sections) were collected on glass slides and stained with toluidine blue. All the sections were examined using a CM 12 Philips electron microscope at the interdepartmental centre for electron microscopy (CISME).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Ultrastructural Analysis of Leishmania Treated with Eugenol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
L. mexicana mexicana promastigotes at the density of 105 cells/mL were treated for 72 h with 0.5, 1, or 2× IC50 of eugenol (IC50 = 16.59 µM), or IC50 of amphotericin B (IC50 = 0.25 µM). After centrifugation at 600× g for 10 min, parasites were washed 2 times with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS, pH 7.4) and once with cacodylate buffer 0.1 M (pH 7.4). They were then immobilized on poly-L-lysine-coated coverslips for 5 min at room temperature. After washing 3 times with cacodylate 0.1 M (pH 7.4) to remove the excess of free-floating Leishmania, the coverslips were incubated in 1% glutaraldehyde in cacodylate 0.1 M (pH 7.4) to crosslink the fixed parasites on the poly-L-lysine coating. The parasites were postfixed with 1% osmium tetroxide in a cacodylate buffer for 2 h at 4 °C and washed in water to eliminate traces of the remaining osmium tetroxide, then dehydrated in a graded series of ethanol, critical-point dried, and coated with 10 nm of gold. Samples were observed with a CM12 Philips electron microscope at 80 kV.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Cellular Uptake of TiO2 Nanoparticles

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells exposed to 100 µg/mL TiO2-NPs for 24 h were washed three times with phosphate saline buffer, fixed with 2.5% glutaraldehyde and post-fixed with OsO4. They were then dehydrated by immersion in solutions of ethanol with increasing concentration and embedded in Epon. Ultrathin sections were prepared by ultramicrotomy and counterstained with uranyl acetate and lead citrate. These samples were observed using a CM12 Philips electron microscope, operating at 80 kV.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Ultrastructural Analysis of Biofilm Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Biofilm cells (IDH781 and EA1002) were grown as described above and fixed overnight using a mixture of 2.5% glutaraldehyde (v/v) and 4% paraformaldehyde in 0.1 M cacodylate buffer (pH 7.4) at 4°C. The glutaraldehyde/paraformaldehyde was removed by vacuum aspiration, the bacterial cells were washed once with PBS, and then dehydrated through a graded ethanol treatment. The cells were removed from the dishes by using propylene oxide. The floating biofilm layers were washed with several changes of propylene oxide, pelleted by low-speed centrifugation, infiltrated and embedded in Epon resin. Ultrathin sections (97 nm) were prepared on an LKB III ultramicrotome, sections were picked up on a 200 mesh copper grid and stained with uranyl acetate and lead citrate. Electron micrographs from a Philips CM12 electron microscope (80 kV; Philips, Eindhoven, The Netherlands) were obtained using an AMT digital camera.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Ultrastructural Analysis of K562 Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cell morphology was examined under a light microscope and a transmission electron microscope. The K562 cells were first observed under a Leica DMR-HC (Leica Microsystems GmbH, Wetzlar, Germany) upright research microscope, and microscopic images were captured using Openlab imaging software, version 5.5.2 (PerkinElmer, Inc., Waltham, MA, USA). For transmission electron microscopic observation, the cells were fixed with 2% glutaraldehyde and 1% osmium tetroxide; and dehydrated in graded ethanol solutions. Following embedding in TAAB 812 epoxy resin (TAAB Laboratories Equipment, Ltd., Aldermaston, UK) ultrathin 80 nm sections were produced using a Reichert Ultracut E Ultramicrotome (Leica, Vienna, Austria). Following staining with 1% lead citrate and 2% alcoholic uranyl acetate, the sections were examined under a Philips CM-12 electron microscope (Philips, Amsterdam, Netherlands) at 80 kV.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Ultrastructural Tissue Imaging Methods

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The P1 patient biopsies were fixed with glutaraldehyde (2.5 %, pH 7.4), post fixed with osmium tetroxide (2 %), dehydrated, and embedded in resin (EMBed-812, Electron Microscopy Sciences, Hatfield, USA). Ultra-thin sections were stained with uranyl acetate and lead citrate, and observed using a Philips CM120 electron microscope (Philips, Amsterdam, Netherlands) and photo-documented using a Morada camera (Soft Imaging System, Münster, Germany). EM was not available for P2.
Murine TA muscles were fixed in 4% PFA and 2.5% glutaraldehyde in 0.1 M phosphate buffer (pH 7.2) overnight at 4°C and processed as previously described [7 (link)]. Images were recorded on a Philips CM12 electron microscope (Philips).
Three dpf zebrafish larvae were fixed in formaldehyde-glutaraldehyde-picric acid in cacodylate buffer overnight at 4°C, followed by osmication and uranyl acetate staining. Subsequently, embryos were dehydrated in a series of ethanol washes and embedded in TAAB Epon (Marivac Ltd., Halifax, Canada). Sections (95 nm) were cut with a Leica UltraCut microtome (Leica, Wetzlar, Germany), picked up on 100-μm Formvar-coated copper grids, and stained with 0.2% lead citrate. Sections were viewed and imaged with a Philips Tecnai BioTwin Spirit electron microscope (Philips) at the Harvard Medical School Electron Microscopy Core.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Microscopic Visualization of HRP Internalization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For observation using light microscopy, HeLa WT cells on glass coverslips were rinsed with PBS and then 3 μg of Pt-Dd linked HRP or Bs-Ds linked HRP or free HRP in 50 μL DMEM medium was applied to the cells. After 1 h of incubation at 37°C, the cells were washed three times with PBS to wash out unbound VLPs. Triton X-100 of 0.1% was added for 5 min and the cells were washed again by PBS prior to DAB staining using the substrate solution containing 0.05% 3, 3′-diaminobenzidine (Sigma), 0.05% nickel chloride, and 0.015% H2O2 in PBS, pH 7.2 for 5 min at RT in dark storage. The cell staining was mounted on glass slides and observed directly by inverted phase contrast microscope (Leica). The cells incubated by free HRP served as control.
For electron microscopy evaluation, HeLa WT cells in 4 well Permanox® slide (Lab-Tek®) were incubated with 7.5 μg of Pt-Dd linked HRP or free HRP in 100 μL DMEM medium for 1 h at 37°C. For the detection of HRP activity, the cells were incubated for another 1 h in DAB substrate solution as described above. After being rinsed with PBS several times, the cells were fixed in 2% PFA and stained with 2% uranyl acetate. The samples were dehydrated in a graded series of ethanol and propylene oxide and embedded in Spurr's resin. Thin sections were cut with ultramicrotome (Leica), collected onto grids, and examined in a Phillips CM12 electron microscope.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Ultrastructural Analysis of Muscle Pathology in ALS Mice

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Age-matched non-tg and hSOD1mus-G37R, -G93A, and -wild-type tg mice (15–17 months of age) received an anesthetic overdose and were perfused transcardially with 2% paraformaldehyde/2% glutaraldehyde. The group sizes were 2 mice per genotype. Tissue samples of left and right biceps femoris were taken from each mouse and processed and embedded in plastic for conventional transmission EM as described (71 (link)). Tissue samples were cut in the transverse plane at 0.5 μm for high-resolution light microscopy at 1000x magnification, and then thin sections were cut and collected on copper grids for EM. These sections were viewed and imaged using a Phillips CM12 electron microscope. Digital electron micrographs from each mouse genotype were used to examine and quantify myofiber sarcomeres, inclusions, mitochondria, and satellite cells in at least twenty images per mouse.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!