The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

177 protocols using cd206

1

Identifying Lung Macrophage Subsets

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The MACS CD206+ enriched population of lung resident macrophages were incubated with FcR Block (422302; BioLegend) for 5 min and stained at a dilution of 1:50 with one of two panels of directly conjugated antibodies for 30 min at 4°C: anti-human CD45 (563792; BD), CD204 (371906; BioLegend), CD206 (321132; BioLegend), CD14 (562698; BD Biosciences), CD16 (302028; BioLegend), ACE2 (FAB933P; R&D), HLA-DR (307618; BioLegend), CD11b (393114; BioLegend), CD11c (301644; BioLegend); anti-human CD45 (324016; BioLegend), CD204 (371904; BioLegend), and CD206 (321103; BioLegend). Stained cells were then washed with FACS buffer (2% FBS in PBS) three times, and then incubated with cell viability marker propidium iodide (PI, 1 μg/ml, 421301; BioLegend). Flow cytometry was performed on a FACS Aria II (BD Biosciences).
Living (PI) single, immune (CD45+), and lung resident macrophages (CD206+) were stained for the above panel of cell surface antigens that have previously been suggested to segregate them into AMs and IMs, and that were differentially expressed according to the scRNA-seq transcriptomic profiles obtained from lung slice culture and sorted into CD206+CD204hi and CD206+CD204lo populations. The sorted populations were directly subjected to 10x single-cell mRNA sequencing at BSL2 as described above, which confirmed their molecular identities as AMs and IMs, respectively.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Multi-parameter Flow Cytometry Profiling

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Flow cytometry was performed by staining with Zombie Yellow viability dye, blocking with anti-CD16/32, and staining for 30 min at 4°C with the following anti-human antibodies: CD45 (BD:HI30), CD3 (BD:UCHT1), CD11b (Biolegend:M1-70), CD206 (Biolegend:15-2), CD163 (Biolegend:GHI/61), CD271 (Biolegend:ME20.4), PD-L1 (Biolegend:29E.2A3); or anti-mouse antibodies: CD45 (Biolegend:30-F-11), CD11b (Biolegend:M1-70), F4/80 (Biolegend:F4/80), Ly6G (Biolegend:1A8), Ly6C (Biolegend:HK1.4), IA/IE (BD:M5/114), CD206 (Biolegend:C068C2), PD-L1 (Biolegend:10F.9G2), PD-1 (BD:J43), IFN-γ (Biolegend:XMG1.2), CD3 (Tonbo:145-2C11), CD8 (Biolegend:YTS156.7.7), CD4 (BD:GK1.5), CD106 (Biolegend:429-MVCAM.A), EpCAM (Biolegend:G8.8), CD44 (Biolegend:IM7), Sca1 (Biolegend:D7). For IFN-γ, cells were pre-stimulated with PMA (20 ng/mL), Ionomycin (Sigma, 1 μg/mL) and Golgi stop (BD, 0.8 μL/106 cells) for 4 hr. Samples were subsequently run using BD FACS LSRII or sorted using BD FACS ARIA. Data were analyzed using FlowJo.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

EV Binding to Monocytes: Receptor Blocking

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Plasma-EVs, aged RBC-EVs, or EV subtypes were stained with PKH26 Red Fluorescent Cell Linker Dye (Sigma-Aldrich). EVs were washed twice with 10% exosome-free FBS in RPMI to quench the unbound dye. Recombinant annexin V (BD Biosciences) or functional grade blocking monoclonal antibodies against phosphatidylserine (PS) (Millipore), CD36 (Stemcell Technologies), CD163, CD206 (BioLegend), TLR1 (Invivogen), TLR2, and TLR4 (BioLegend) were used at multiple concentrations (0.01–2.0 µg/mL) to block EV–monocyte binding. In some experiments, EVs were incubated with annexin V or anti-PS antibody. In other experiments PBMCs were incubated with monoclonal antibodies against CD36, CD163, CD206, TLR1, TLR2, or TLR4 in a 5% CO2 incubator at 37°C for 1 h. PBMCs (500,000) were cultured with EVs, in a final volume of 0.5 mL for 24 h. PBMCs were stained with CD14-PerCP/Cy5.5 (BioLegend) and were fixed in 2% paraformaldehyde solution. PBMCs were subject to flow cytometry, and percent binding of monocytes to EVs was measured by gating on CD14+ cells.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Tumor Immune Profiling in EC Mouse Model

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Tumor tissues from EC cell‐bearing mice were removed, minced, and digested into single cells. The cells were resuspended in 100 μl PBS and incubated with the indicated Abs at 4°C for 40 min. Anti‐mouse MHC class II (BioLegend), CD11b (101263; BioLegend), CD86 (105032; BioLegend), CD206 (141708; BioLegend), CD3 (100235; BioLegend), CD8a (100713; BioLegend), γ‐interferon (IFN‐γ) (505808; BioLegend), anti‐human CD11b (101263; BioLegend), CD86 (305412; BioLegend), CD206 (321119; BioLegend), CD3 (344747; BioLegend), CD8 (344747; BioLegend), IFN‐γ (502528; BioLegend), p‐P65 (Cell Signaling Technology), and Ki‐67 (130–100–340; Miltenyi Biotec) were used. Cells were incubated with PBS twice before analysis using a flow cytometer (CytoFLEX; BD Biosciences). CytExpert analysis software (BD Biosciences) was used for the analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Macrophage Polarization Assay with CHA@GOx

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Macrophage typing assays were used to assess the effect of CHA@GOx on immune cells. Primary macrophages were seeded in 24-well plates (2∗105 ​cells/well) in DMEM supplemented with 10% FBS and 1% penicillin streptomycin. Macrophage typing was then observed by FCM under different treatment conditions. (1) Macrophages were treated with PBS, GOx, HCA or CHA@GOx (5 ​μM) for 8 ​h and then fluorophore-labeled antibodies (F4/80, CD80, CD206: 0.5 ​μL each/test, BioLegend, USA) were used to detect F4/80, CD80 and CD206 antigen expression in each group of cells. (2) Macrophages were first treated with LPS and TNF-α for 12 ​h, and then the steps of experiment (1) above were repeated.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Immune Cell Phenotyping by Flow Cytometry

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were incubated with CD16/CD32 Fc block prior to staining. To stain for surface antigens, cells were incubated with antibodies against F4/80 (BM-8, Biolegend), CD45 (Biolegend) or CD11b (Biolegend) for 30 min. For intracellular staining the cells were permeabilized using BD Cytofix/Cytoperm (BD Pharmigen) and incubated with antibodies for CD206 (Biolegend) and/or iNOS (Invitrogen). The anti-eIF5AHyp antibody was developed in-house and used at a 1:75 dilution. All other antibodies were used at a 1:100 dilution. Cells were analyzed on the LSR Fortessa cytometer (BD). Data were analyzed using FlowJo software (Tree Star).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Acetylcholine Modulates Monocyte Polarization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Here, we verified whether acetylcholine could stimulate the differentiation of monocytes to the M2 phenotype. Different acetylcholine concentrations (0.5 μg/mL, 1 μg/mL, 2 μg/mL, and 4 μg/mL) of human myeloid leukemia mononuclear cells (THP-1), which is the monocytic cell line, were used to stimulate THP-1 for 24 hours. Then, the cells were washed with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) containing 1% FBS and 1% Hepes and stained using CD11b (5 μg/mL, Biolegend), CD206 (5 μg/mL, Biolegend), and CD86 (1 μg/mL, Biolegend) antibodies for 30 min at room temperature. THP-1 cells were cultured in RPMI-1640 (Gibco, USA) supplemented with 10% FBS (BI, Israel) and penicillin/streptomycin in a humidified incubator at 37°C and 5% CO2. The data were collected using LSRFortessa™ FACS (BD Bioscience) and analyzed using FlowJo software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Characterization of Endothelial Progenitor Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The peripheral blood mononuclear cells were suspended in saline and incubated with fluorescein isothiocyanate anti-mouse stem cells antigen (Sca)-1 (Invitrogen, 11-5981-82, Carlsbad, CA, USA) and phycoerythrin anti-mouse vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2, also known as Flk-1 (Invitrogen, 12-5821-82, Carlsbad, CA, USA) at room temperature for 30 min. A BD FACScalibur flow cytometer (BD, East Rutherford, NJ) was used, and data were analyzed with FloJo (Treestar). Data are presented as % gated, relative to control group.
EPCs were harvested and washed prior to suspension in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) for flow cytometry. To identify the characteristics of EPCs, VE-cadherin (Biolegend, 348505, San Diego, CA), CD31 (Biolegend, 303117, San Diego, CA), CD34 (BD, 555821, East Rutherford, NJ), KDR (R&D, FAP357, Minneapolis, MN, USA), CD133 (MACS, 130-111-756, Germany), CD3 (Biolegend, 300407, San Diego, CA), CD68 (Biolegend, 333805, San Diego, CA), CD86 (Biolegend, 374203, San Diego, CA), CD163 (Biolegend, 33605, San Diego, CA), and CD206 (Biolegend, 321123, San Diego, CA) antibodies were used. Cells were analyzed by BD FACScalibur flow cytometer (BD, East Rutherford, NJ), and data were analyzed with FloJo (Treestar). Data are presented as % gated.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Quantifying Macrophage Oxidative Stress

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Flow cytometry was used to measure mtH2O2 levels and detect macrophage markers. For mtH2O2 measurement, cells were incubated with 10 μmol/L Mito-LX for 1 h and then collected. After cells were washed with PBS, mtH2O2 fluorescence intensity was measured with a Sony SA3800 flow cytometer (Sony, Japan). At least 20,000 events were recorded for each sample. The results were analyzed in FlowJo V10 software. Macrophages were incubated with antibodies to CD11C (Biolegend, USA) or CD206 (Biolegend, USA), so as to detect the macrophage markers. After incubated with the antibodies for 30 min, the macrophages were washed in PBS. Marker expression was analyzed by a BD LSRII flow cytometer (BD, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Comprehensive Immune Cell Profiling in Lungs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Lung-infiltrating immune cells were stained with fluorochrome-coupled antibodies against mouse CD45 (clone 30-F11, BioLegend), CD3 (clone 17A2, BioLegend), CD4 (clone GK1.5, BioLegend), CD8 (clone 53–6.7, BioLegend), CD44 (clone IM7, BioLegend), CD62L (clone MEL-14, Biolegend), CD69 (clone H1.2F3, BioLegend), 4–1BB (CD137, clone 17B5, Biolegend), GITR (CD357, clone DTA-1, BioLegend), GZMB (clone GB11, BD Horizon), OX40 (CD134, clone OX-86, BioLegend), ICOS (clone 7E.17G9, BD OptiBuild), CD11b (clone M1/70, BioLegend), CD11c (clone N418, BioLegend), Ly-6G (clone 1A8, BioLegend), SiglecF (Clone E50–2440, BD Pharmingen), Ly-6C (clone HK1.4, BioLegend), Gr1 (Ly-6G/Ly-6C, clone RB6–8C5, BioLegend), CD103 (clone 2E7, BioLegend), F4/80 (clone BM8, BioLegend), CD80 (clone 16–10A1, BioLegend), CD86 (clone GL-1, BioLegend), IA/IE (clone M5/114.15.2, Biolegend) and CD206 (clone C068C2, BioLegend).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!