The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

5 protocols using anti opg

1

Immunohistochemical Evaluation of RANKL and OPG

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Briefly, paraffin sections were deparaffinized in xylene, rehydrated in graded alcohols and antigens were retrieved in citrate buffer. Endogen peroxidase was blocked using a peroxidase-blocking reagent (Dako) and non-specific binding sites were blocked by the Protein Block Serum Free solution (Dako). The slides were then incubated with the primary antibody “anti-human RANKL (70525, R&D systems) or anti-OPG (polyclonal, Abcam)”. Immunoperoxidase staining was performed using the EnVision system (Dako) according to the supplier's recommendations. Colorimetric detection was completed with diaminobenzidine (Dako) for 5 min. Slides were then counterstained with hematoxylin. RANKL and OPG expression was evaluated, as previously described, by a semi-quantitative score of the intensity and extent of the staining according to an arbitrary scale.59 (link)
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Femur Protein Expression Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The right femur tissues were homogenized in RIPA buffer using a homogenizer and the homogenate was centrifuged at 12,000 g for 15 min at 4°C. Total proteins of the supernatant were measured using the Bicinchoninic acid Protein Assay Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Protein samples were separated by 15% SDS-polyacrylamide gels, and then transferred onto a PVDF membrane (Roche, USA). After blocking with 5% skim milk for 1 h at room temperature, the membrane was hybridized with the following primary antibodies overnight at 4°C: anti-OPG (1:1,000; Abcam, USA), anti-RANKL (1:1,000; Abcam), anti-RunX2 (1:1,000; Abcam), anti-OCN (1:1,000; Abcam), and GAPDH (1:1,000; Abcam). The membrane was washed with TBST and subsequently incubated with horseradish peroxidase-labeled secondary antibody for 45 min at room temperature. Visualization was performed with chemiluminescence detection reagent (ECL, USA). The relative protein levels were analyzed with ImageJ image analysis software (National Institutes of Health, USA) and normalized to GAPDH.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Quantifying Bone Protein Expression

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total proteins were isolated using RIPA buffer from both cells and bone tissues then analyzed with a protein estimation kit (Sigma Aldrich, USA). Sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) gels were used to separate 10 µg of proteins and transferred to PVDF membranes. Prior to incubating the membranes with antibodies they were blocked with non-fat milk (5%). The antibodies used were anti-Runx2 (1:500 Abcam), anti-RANKL (1:500 Abcam), anti-BMP2 (1:500 Abcam), anti-OPG (1:500, Abcam), anti-p-STAT3 (1:500 Abcam) and anti-p-JAK2 (1:500 Abcam). The antibodies were incubated with membranes for 12 hours at 4 °C. The blots were then incubated with secondary antibodies for 1 hour at room temperature and visualized with the aid of chemiluminescent reagent and densitometric analysis was done by image reading software (Bio-Rad, USA). The relative expression of bands was done using actin as a loading control.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Western Blot Analysis of Osteogenic Markers

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were harvested, lysed with lysis buffer (ASPEN, Wuhan, China), and
centrifuged at 16,200 g for 10 min. Total proteins in the supernatant were
measured using a BCA protein assay kit (ASPEN, Wuhan, China). Total proteins
were extracted from MC3T3-E1 cells. The protein at 30 µg was resolved by 10%
SDS-PAGE gels (ASPEN, Wuhan, China). After electrophoresis, the proteins were
transferred onto nitrocellulose membrane (Millipore, USA). The membranes were
blocked with 5% nonfat milk (ASPEN, Wuhan, China) at room temperature for 1 h.
The samples were probed with anti-GAPDH (1:10,000; Abcam, UK), anti-IL-1β
(1:1000; Abcam, UK), anti-TNF-α (1:500; Abcam, UK), anti-RANK (1:1000; Abcam,
UK), anti-RANKL (1:500; Novusbio, Shanghai, China), anti-OPG (1:1000; Abcam,
UK), anti-OCN (1:500; Abcam, UK), anti-TLR2 (1:1000; Abcam, UK), and anti-TLR4
(1:500; Abcam, UK) Abs. HRP-conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG (1:10000; ASPEN,
Wuhan, China) was used for detection.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Immunohistochemical Analysis of OPG and RANKL

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Paraffin-embedded heads from 2 samples from both groups were sectioned in the coronal plane at 4 μm thickness and mounted onto slides. Sections were dipped in xylene to remove the paraffin and dehydrated through a graded alcohol series. In order to prevent endogenous peroxidase activity, sections were incubated with 3% hydrogen peroxide in methanol for 30 min at room temperature following sodium citrate antigen unmasking treatment for 20 min at 96 °C. Five percent normal goat serum in PBS-Triton (0.3%) was used for blocking at room temperature. The following antibodies were used: anti-OPG and anti-RANKL (1:200, rabbit polyclonal antibody, Abcam) in 5% normal Bovine Serum at 5%, overnight at 4 °C. After that, the slides were treated with peroxidase staining (Sigma-Aldrich) and developed with diaminobezidine tetrahydrochloride (DAB-Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA, USA). The slides were then counterstained with Harris hematoxylin or methyl green and mounted with Entellan (Merck Millipore, São SP, Brazil) in order to visualize nuclei of the cells. Negative controls were obtained by omitting the primary antibody of each reaction. The slides were photographed under a Nikon Eclipse TE300 microscope (Nikon Company, Melville, NY, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!