The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

41 protocols using mouse anti ha

1

Immunostaining with Antibody Panel

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The following primary antibodies were used for immunostaining: goat anti-EphB2 (1:200–1:500, R&D), mouse anti-EphB2 (1:200–1:500, Invitrogen), mouse anti-HA (1:1000, BioLegend), mouse anti-FLAG (1:2000,Sigma), rabbit anti-actin (1:1000, Sigma), goat anti-ephrin-B1 (1:200, R&D systems), guinea pig anti-VGLUT1 (1:5000, Millipore). Secondary antibodies Atto 425, Dylight 488 or Cy2, Dylight 647 or Cy5, and Cy3 from Jackson ImmunoResearch, Rockland or Abcam were used from 1:200 to 1:500.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Visualizing CRIPT and SAP97 in Neurons

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
We found none of the commercially available antibodies to CRIPT or SAP97 were suitable for immunocytochemical studies (e.g., Abcam; ProteinTech Group; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, NeuroMab). We devised an alternative strategy for visualizing CRIPT in neurons. We cotransfected neurons with a miRNA designed to knockdown endogenous CRIPT alongside an RNAi-resistant version of WT CRIPT containing a hemagglutinin (HA) tag on the amino terminus. When these plasmids were cotransfected with a GFP reporter and stained for HA, we visualized punctate HA immunoreactivity in the cell body and dendrites of transfected neurons. The molar ratio of the transfected plasmids (e.g., GFP:CRIPTmiRNA:RNAi resistant HA-CRIPT was 1:5:2) to ensure that HA staining was restricted to neurons with a high likelihood of concomitant knockdown of endogenous CRIPT. Both mouse anti-HA (BioLegend) and rabbit anti-HA (Santa Cruz Biotechnology) worked well in this application. In one set of experiments, we used a mammalian expression vector engineered to express GFP-SAP97 in localization studies.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Western Blot Protein Detection

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Proteins separated by 4–12% SDS-PAGE were transferred to a nitrocellulose membrane using iBlot Western blot kit (Invitrogen) and analyzed using mouse monoclonal anti-FLAG antibody (Sigma), (1:2000 dilution), mouse anti-HA (BioLegend) (1:1000 dilution), mouse anti-EGFP (Sigma) (1:2000) and His-probe (H-15, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, 1:2000) primary antibodies. The antibody-antigen complexes were detected using horseradish peroxidase-conjugated goat anti-mouse (1:10000 dilution) secondary antibody and enhanced chemiluminescence (ECL) reagents obtained from GE Healthcare.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Quantitative Immunoblot Analysis of Proteins

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Proteins separated by 4%–12% SDS-PAGE were transferred to a nitrocellulose membrane using the iBlot Western blot kit (Invitrogen) and analyzed using mouse monoclonal anti-FLAG (MilliporeSigma, F3165-1MG, 1:2000 dilution), mouse anti-HA (BioLegend, clone 16B12, catalog 901502, 1:1000 dilution), and mouse anti-GFP (Santa Cruz, SC-9996, 1:2000 dilution) primary antibodies. The antibody-antigen complexes were detected using horseradish peroxidase–conjugated bovine anti-mouse (Santa Cruz, SC-2371, 1:10,000 dilution) secondary antibody and enhanced chemiluminescence (ECL) reagents obtained from GE Healthcare. PDE6C and PDE6CR565Q protein expression levels were quantified using analysis of immunoblot data with NIH ImageJ software according to the user guide.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Antibodies Used in Protein Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Antibodies used in this study include affinity-purified rabbit anti-Mad1 antibodies prepared against amino acids 333–617 of human Mad12 (link) and diluted 1:3000 for western blots and 1:2000 for immunofluorescence, mouse anti-SUMO1 (21C7, Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank) diluted 1:250, mouse anti-Myc (9E10, Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank) diluted 1:200, mouse anti-tubulin (12G10, Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank) diluted 1:5000, rabbit anti-GFP (#2555S, Cell Signaling), mouse anti-p53 (DO-1, #sc-126, Santa Cruz), rabbit anti-p53 (#NB200-171, Novusbio), mouse anti-actin (JLA20, Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank) diluted 1:500, rabbit anti-tubulin (#2144S, Cell Signaling), rabbit anti-p21 (#ab188224, Abcam), rabbit anti histone H3 (# 9715S, Cell Signaling), mouse anti-FLAG M2 (Sigma) diluted 1:2500, rabbit anti-PML (sc-5621) diluted 1:500, and mouse anti-HA (#901501, Biolegend), and pan-cytokeratin antibody (AE1 + AE3 conjugated to Alexa Fluor® 647, Novus, cat. no. NBP2-33200AF647).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Immunofluorescence Staining of BG2-c2 Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
BG2-c2 cells were fixed in 4% formaldehyde/PBS for 10 min and permeabilized with PBST-0.2 (PBS, 0.2% Triton X-100) or saponin/PBS-0.1 (PBS, 0.1% saponin; for TMR-Dex-labeled cells only) for 10 min, blocked with 1% BSA/PBS 30 min, and incubated with primary antibodies in 1% BSA/PBS for 1 h at room temperature. The following antibodies were used: rat anti-Abi at 1:100, mouse anti-HA (BioLegend) at 1:100, and rabbit anti-Myc (Cell Signaling Technology) at 1:100. FITC- and Cy5-conjugated secondary antibodies (Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories) were used at 1:200. Actin filaments were stained with 6.6 μM rhodamine-phalloidin (Molecular Probes). For each cell, single confocal slice or Z stack of optical sections (0.33 μm) were taken with an LSM 800 confocal microscope using a Plan Apo ×63 1.4 Oil objective.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Surface Expression of Recombinant Proteins

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Constructs evaluated in HEK cell membrane display were cloned into the pPPI4 vector (Sanders et al., 2002 (link)) containing a C-terminal gpi anchor motif. Small-scale 2–5 mL HEK cell cultures were transfected with PEI as above. Cells were stained for flow cytometric analysis essentially as for yeast above; 1.5–2.5e5 cells were washed in PBSF three times prior to incubation in primary antibody at desired concentration and 1:200 mouse anti-HA (Biolegend) in 50 μL. Cells were washed three times, and stained with anti-hu Fd-FITC (ThermoFisher) at a 1:500 dilution and goat anti-mouse (H + L) Alexa Fluor 488 (Life Technologies); or with 1:1000 dilutions of anti-hu (H + L) Alexa Fluor 647 and anti-mouse (H + L) Alexa Fluor 488 (both Life Technologies); and a 1:40 dilution of calcein violet live-dead stain (ThermoFisher).
For analysis, cells were first gated on forward and side scatter, followed by gating on calcein violet for live cells. Cells expressing protein were gated using anti-HA antibody signal, and the resulting median fluorescence intensity was quantified as a measure of antibody binding.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Antibody Sourcing and Validation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Antibodies were purchased from the following sources: Cell Signaling Technologies (Beverly, MA, USA): rabbit anti-HA (#3724); Thermo Fisher Scientific: mouse anti-V5 (#R960-25); Sigma: rabbit anti--actin (#A2066); Biolegend (San Diego, CA, USA): mouse anti-HA (#901513).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Immunolabeling of Drosophila Adult Brains

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Adult fly brains were dissected in cold phosphate-buffered saline with 0.1% Triton-X (PBST) and fixed in 4% formaldehyde for 20–35 min. Brains were rinsed 3 X 15 min with PBST, blocked for 60 min in 5% normal donkey serum in PBST (NDST), and incubated for 24 hrs at RT in primary antibody diluted in NDST. Brains were then rinsed 3 X 15 min in PBST, incubated for 24 hrs in secondary antibody diluted in NDST, rinsed 3 X 15 min in PBST, cleared for 5 min in 50% glycerol in PBST, and mounted in Vectashield. Primary antibodies were as follows: rabbit anti-GFP 1:1000 (Molecular Probes A-11122), rat anti-RFP 1:1000 (Chromotek 5F8), mouse anti-HA 1:250 (BioLegend 901501), rabbit anti-SIFa 1:4000 (gift of J. Veenstra), and guinea pig anti-PERIOD 1:1000 (UPR 1140; gift of A. Sehgal). Secondary antibodies were as follows: FITC donkey anti-rabbit 1:1000 (Jackson 711-095-152), Cy3 donkey anti-rat 1:1000 (Jackson 712-16-150), Cy5 donkey anti-mouse 1:1000 (Jackson 715-175-151) and Cy3 donkey anti-guinea pig 1:1000 (Jackson 706-165-148). Immunolabeled brains were visualized with a Fluoview 1000 confocal microscope (Olympus). Trans-Tango flies were raised at 18°C and dissected ~2 weeks post-eclosion to maximize signal intensity [25 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Antibody-based Protein Visualization and Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The following antibodies were used for immunofluorescence staining: mouse anti-HA (1:500, Roche) and goat-anti-mouse Alexa 488 (1:400, Thermo Fisher Scientific). The following antibodies were used for western blot: mouse anti-HA (1:2,000, BioLegend), rabbit anti-GFP (1:10,000, Abcam), goat anti‐mouse IRDye800CW (1:15.000, LI‐COR), and goat‐anti‐rabbit IRDye680LT (1:20,000, LI‐COR). A reagent used in this study is rapalog (AP21967, TaKaRa).
The following DNA expression constructs in this study have been described before: GW1–PEX3–mRFP–FKBP1, β-actin–Kif1A_MDC–FRB (Kevenaar et al., 2016 (link)) (mouse cDNA), BirA coding vector (van der Vaart et al., 2013 (link)), and pebioGFP (van der Vaart et al., 2013 (link)). pGW1–HA–KBP contained a linker (GGATCCCCGGAATTCGGCACGAGGGAGGCCGCT) between the HA tag and KBP and was cloned using PCR-based strategies with human KBP cDNA (KIAA1279, IMAGE clone 4550085) as template and ligation into the pGW1–HA backbone. A similar strategy was used to generate the mutated KBP constructs, listed in Table 2. β-actin–KIF15_MDC–FRB was cloned using a PCR-based Gibson Assembly strategy with mouse KIF15 cDNA as template into the β-actin–KIF1A_MDC–FRB backbone. PebioGFP-KIF1A_MDC and pebioGFP-KIF15_MDC were cloned into the pebioGFP backbone using PCR-based strategies with MDC–FRB constructs as templates.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!