The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

12 protocols using mantra quantitative pathology workstation

1

Quantitative Multiplex Imaging Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Images were acquired using the Mantra Quantitative Pathology Work Station (Akoya Biosciences). A minimum of ten images were acquired from each tissue seciton. All cube filters were used for each image capture (DAPI, CY3, CY5, CY7, Texas Red,Qdot) and the saturation protection feature was utilized. After all images were acquired, images were analyzed using inForm® Cell Analysis software (Akoya Biosciences). Using this software, acinar, ductal, acinar to ductal metaplasia and PanIN samples were batch analyzed by their separate diagnoses which was confirmed by a pathologist. Cell segmentation was completed using DAPI as a basis of cell location and nuclear size and all cells segmented into the following subsets (nucleus, cytoplasm, and membrane). Using the automated training software, basic phenotypes were created. For the fibroblast panel, this included Vimentin+, smooth muscle actin (SMA+) and PDGFR+. For the immune based panel, this included CD3+, CD8+, CD163+, PanCK+ and FoxP3+. Software output consisting of mean fluorescent intensity (mfi) of each antibody-fluorophore pair, basic phenotypes, and x and y coordinates were acquired for further processing to determine relative population of each cell type.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Multiplex Immunofluorescence Imaging of TMAs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
TMA blocks were cut into 5-micron slices and placed onto charged slides for processing. Slides were baked in a hybridization chamber for 1 hour at 60°C. Once baked, TMA slides were subjected to deparaffinization and rehydration, then fixed with formalin. Following our established protocol (35 (link)), multiplex staining was conducted on the slides through six rounds of staining. The slides were prepared for each round of staining using either an antigen retrieval buffer with pH 9 or pH 6 (AR9 and AR6 Akoya Biosciences) preceded by a primary antibody. The following primary antibodies were used—CD3, CD8, CD163, PD-L1, pancytokeratin, and FoxP3 (Supplementary Table 1) followed by secondary antibody application (Opal Polymer, Akoya Biosciences) and fluorescent tyramide signal amplification (TSA, Akoya Biosciences). Slides were counter stained using 4’,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI), mounted, cover-slipped and left to dry overnight. Using the Mantra Quantitative Pathology WorkStation (Akoya Biosciences), cores were imaged at 20x magnification in all channels: DAPI, FITC, CY3, CY5, CY7, Texas Red, and Qdot, with an exposure of 250 ms. Composite images were created by automatically merging images from each channel, then taken for further analysis. More detailed descriptions of staining and imaging methods can be found in prior publications (35 (link), 41 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Multiplex IHC for Tumor Immune Profiling

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Extracted tumors were fixed with 10% formalin, embedded in paraffin and sliced in 4 μm thickness. The multiplex IHC was performed with an Opal 7-Color Automation IHC Kit (Akoya Biosciences, Hopkinton, MA, USA) and BOND RXm automated stainer (Leica Biosystems, Wetzlar, Germany) using the following antibodies: anti-pan-cytokeratin (CK) (rabbit poly; Bioss, Woburn, MA, USA), anti-CD8α (EPR20305; Abcam, Cambridge, United Kingdom), anti-CD44 (IM7; Bio X Cell, Lebanon, NH, USA), anti-F4/80 (D2S9R; Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, MA, USA), anti-Ly6G (1A8; Bio X Cell, Lebanon, NH, USA), anti-CD11b (EPR1344; Abcam, Cambridge, United Kingdom) and anti-Gzmb (rabbit polyclonal; Abcam, Cambridge, United Kingdom). The slides were imaged in the Mantra Quantitative Pathology Workstation (Akoya Biosciences, Menlo Park, CA, USA). The multiplex IHC images were analyzed using inForm Tissue Finder software (Akoya Biosciences, Menlo Park, CA, USA). Cell phenotype was defined based on the antigen expressions as the following: CD8+ = CD8+ T cell, F4/80+ = macrophage, Ly6G+CD11b+ = neutrophil, Gzmb+CD3− = NK cell. Tissue phenotype was determined as the following: pan-cytokeratin positive = tumor. CD8+ T cells in the tumor area were counted as tumor-infiltrating CD8+ T cells.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Quantitative Pathology Imaging Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Images were taken using the Mantra Quantitative Pathology Work Station (Akoya Biosciences) as described in the Online Methods.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Spatial Quantitative Pathology Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Images were acquired using the Mantra™ Quantitative Pathology Work Station (Akoya Biosciences). A minimum of ten images were acquired from each tissue seciton. All cube filters were used for each image capture (DAPI, CY3, CY5, CY7, Texas Red, Qdot) and the saturation protection feature was utilized. After all images were acquired, images were analyzed using inForm® Cell Analysis™ software (Akoya Biosciences). Using this software, acinar, ductal, acinar to ductal metaplasia and PanIN samples were batch analyzed by their separate diagnoses which was confirmed by a pathologist. Cell segmentation was completed using DAPI as a basis of cell location and nuclear size and all cells segmented into the following subsets (nucleus, cytoplasm, and membrane). Using the automated training software, basic phenotypes were created. For the fibroblast panel, this included Vimentin+, smooth muscle actin (SMA+) and PDGFR+. For the immune based panel, this included CD3+, CD8+, CD163+, PanCK+ and FoxP3+. Software output consisting of mean fluorescent intensity (mfi) of each antibody-fluorophore pair, basic phenotypes, and x and y coordinates were acquired for further processing to determine relative population of each cell type.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Immunofluorescent Staining of Cryosections

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
5 μm cryosections were fixed in acetone for 10 minutes, then rehydrated and permeabilized for 10 minutes in TBS with 0.5% Tween (TBST) detergent. Non-specific binding of endogenous IgG was minimized by 20-minute blocking with1.6% human IgG. Slides were incubated with primary antibodies for 2 hours at room temperature. After two washes in buffer, they were incubated with isotype-specific secondary antibodies for 35 minutes at room temperature. Slides were washed twice more after antibody treatment and mounted in Vectashield Hard Set Mounting Medium with DAPI (Vector Labs). Tissue was imaged immediately after mounting on a Mantra Quantitative Pathology Workstation (Akoya Biosciences) using Mantra Snap 1.0 imaging software and analyzed with inForm image analysis software (Akoya Biosciences).
All secondary antibodies were purchased from Invitrogen and used at a 1:2000 dilution. The antibodies, clones, and dilutions used were: CD3 (UCHT1, BioLegend, 1:40); IL-32 (034, Lifespan Biosciences, 1:100), TCR Vβ5.1 (IMMU157, Beckman-Coulter, 1:10), and TCR Vb12 (Ver 2.32.1, BeckmanCoulter, 1:10)
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Histopathological Analysis of NIR-PIT Tumors

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
One hour after NIR-PIT, tumors were harvested, formalin fixed and paraffin-embedded, and thinly sectioned. Following standard hematoxylin and eosin (H–E) staining, bright-light photomicrographs were obtained using Mantra Quantitative Pathology Workstation (Akoya Biosciences).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Standardized Multiplex Immunohistochemistry Imaging

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All slides were snapped by using the MantraSnap 1.0.3 software included in the Mantra Quantitative Pathology Workstation (Akoya Biosciences) for DAPI, FITC, Cy3, Texas Red, and Cy5 data acquisition. From each tissue section, five different regions of interest were randomly selected with a 20X objective. Images were analyzed using the InForm 2.4.6. software (Akoya Biosciences). Four separated algorithms for trainable tissue and cell segmentation and cell phenotyping were prepared. The tissue was segmented into the tumor parenchyma, stroma, and background compartments and checked by the pathologist. The algorithms were trained to specifically phenotype the cells according to different expression of markers. The optimization workflow of algorithms is listed in Supplement Figure S1. For determining the phenotype of the cells, a phenotyping confidence cut off of 80% was set. The numbers of positive cells of different phenotypes were counted separately per megapixel (Mpx) for the tumor parenchymal and stromal compartments. We introduced several TIL phenotypes for each panel (Table 2).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Multiplex Immunofluorescence Imaging Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Images were acquired using the Mantra Quantitative Pathology Work Station (Akoya Biosciences). A minimum of 10 images were acquired from each tissue section. All cube filters were used for each image capture (DAPI, CY3, CY5, CY7, Texas Red, and Qdot), and the saturation protection feature was utilized. After all images were acquired, they were analyzed using inForm Cell Analysis software (Akoya Biosciences). Using this software, acinar, ductal, ADM, and PanIN samples were batch analyzed by their separate diagnoses, which were confirmed by a pathologist. Cell segmentation was completed using DAPI as a basis of cell location and nuclear size, and all cells were segmented into the following subsets: nucleus, cytoplasm, and membrane. Basic phenotypes were created using the automated training software. For the fibroblast panel, this included vimentin+, SMA+, and PDGFR+. For the immune-based panel, this included CD3+, CD8+, CD163+, PanCK+, and FoxP3+. Software output consisting of mean fluorescent intensity (mfi) of each antibody–fluorophore pair, basic phenotypes, and x and y coordinates was acquired for further processing to determine the relative population of each cell type.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Immunohistochemical Analysis of FFPE Tissues

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissues (FFPE) and tumor microarray (TMA) sections (5 µm thickness) were deparaffinized in xylene and rehydrated in descending alcohols, followed by blocking of endogenous peroxidase in 3% hydrogen peroxide solution (30 min) and heat-induced epitope retrieval in citrate buffer (95 °C, 5 min). Sections were incubated with CD206 (1:100, Clone: C-10, Santa Cruz), iNOS (1:100, Clone: C-11, Santa Cruz), CD16b (1:100, Clone: CLB-gran11.5, BD Biosciences), Ly6G (1:100, Clone: 1A8, BioLegend), p-Smad3 (1:100, Clone: 1D9, Santa Cruz), p-Smad3 (1:200, 600-401-919, Rockland) antibodies overnight (4 °C), sections were incubated in polymer-HRP conjugated secondary antibody (Dako) for 2 h at room temperature, followed by DAB (Thermo-fisher) or Opal-520, 570, 650, 690 TSA dye (Akoya biosciences) development. DAB-stained section images were captured by the Nikon Ni-U Light Microscope and analyzed using Image J analysis software; Opal TSA-stained sections were captured on the Mantra quantitative pathology workstation (Akoya Biosciences) and analyzed by inForm image analysis software 2.6 (Akoya Biosciences) as per our previous studies18 (link),51 (link).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!