The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Cefoperazone sulbactam

Manufactured by Merck Group
Sourced in United States

Cefoperazone-sulbactam is a combination of two antimicrobial agents, cefoperazone and sulbactam, which are used in the laboratory setting for in vitro testing and research purposes. It is a sterile powder that is reconstituted for use. The core function of cefoperazone-sulbactam is to provide a combination of a cephalosporin antibiotic and a beta-lactamase inhibitor for antimicrobial susceptibility testing and other laboratory applications.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

3 protocols using cefoperazone sulbactam

1

Levofloxacin Susceptibility of E. anophelis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The susceptibility of E. anophelis to levofloxacin (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) was assessed by determining the MICs using 96-well broth microdilution panels, following the manufacturer’s guidelines (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Oakwood Village, OH, USA). The antibiotics that were candidates for combination with levofloxacin were minocycline, rifampin, cefoperazone/sulbactam, and sulfamethoxazole/trimethoprim, all obtained from Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA. The interpretation of susceptibility was based on the breakpoints outlined in the 2022 Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute guidelines [20 ] for “other non-Enterobacteriaceae”. levofloxacin susceptibility was defined as an MIC of ≤2 mg/L, whereas MICs of 4 and ≥8 mg/L indicated intermediate sensitivity and resistance, respectively.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Antibiotic Susceptibility Determination

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The susceptibilities to seven categories of antibiotics were determined. Specifically, susceptibility to amikacin, gentamicin, meropenem, imipenem, ampicillin-sulbactam, cefoperazone-sulbactam, ceftazidime, and ciprofloxacin (all antibiotics were obtained from Sigma) was determined using the standard agar dilution method (31 (link)) with breakpoints suggested by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) (26 ). Briefly, bacterial suspensions of each strain were adjusted to a 0.5 McFarland standard and dispensed into the seeding-tray wells of a Cathra replicator system (32 wells). Mueller-Hinton agar plates supplemented with various concentrations of antibiotics were seeded using 1-mm pins. Susceptibility to colistin was determined by measuring MICs using the standard agar dilution method as previously described (31 (link)) and interpreted according to CLSI guidelines (26 ). Susceptibility to tigecycline and colistin was determined using the standard broth microdilution assay.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Antibiotic Susceptibility Determination

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The susceptibilities to seven categories of antibiotics were determined. Specifically, susceptibility to amikacin, gentamicin, meropenem, imipenem, ampicillin-sulbactam, cefoperazone-sulbactam, ceftazidime, and ciprofloxacin (all antibiotics were obtained from Sigma) was determined using the standard agar dilution method (31 (link)) with breakpoints suggested by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) (26 ). Briefly, bacterial suspensions of each strain were adjusted to a 0.5 McFarland standard and dispensed into the seeding-tray wells of a Cathra replicator system (32 wells). Mueller-Hinton agar plates supplemented with various concentrations of antibiotics were seeded using 1-mm pins. Susceptibility to colistin was determined by measuring MICs using the standard agar dilution method as previously described (31 (link)) and interpreted according to CLSI guidelines (26 ). Susceptibility to tigecycline and colistin was determined using the standard broth microdilution assay.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!