The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

9 protocols using ceftazidime caz

1

Antibiotic Susceptibility Testing

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The ciprofloxacin (CIP) and ceftazidime (CAZ) (Sigma-Aldrich, St Louis, USA) minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC) were determined by broth microdilution method, in triplicate30 . The cut-off values were interpreted according to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute guidelines31 .
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Antibiotic Susceptibility in S. maltophilia

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
MICs were determined by agar dilution methods according to the guidelines of the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) (26 ). The following antibiotics/inhibitors were included: trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX; Sigma, St. Louis, MO), ciprofloxacin (CIP; Fluka, Buchs, Switzerland), minocycline (MIN; Sigma, St. Louis, MO), ticarcillin-clavulanate (TIC-CLV; Sigma, St. Louis, MO), ceftazidime (CAZ; Sigma, St. Louis, MO), aztreonam (ATM; Bristol-Myers Squibb, New York, NY), and ceftazidime-avibactam (CZA) and ceftazidime-avibactam and aztreonam (CZA-ATM) combinations using the avibactam-free acid at a constant concentration of 4 g/liter from Advanced ChemBlock, Inc. (Burlingame, CA). Escherichia coli ATCC 25922 and ATCC 35218 were included as quality controls. Where breakpoints for S. maltophilia were not available, those for Pseudomonas aeruginosa were used, as has been previously done (13 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Antibiotic Susceptibility Profiling of Escherichia coli

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Susceptibilities to ampicillin (AMP, Wako Pure Chemical Industries, Ltd., Osaka, Japan), amoxicillin-clavulanic acid (ACV, Sigma-Aldrich Co. LLC., Tokyo, Japan), cefmetazole (CMZ, Sigma-Aldrich), cefotaxime (CTX, Wako Pure Chemical), ceftazidime (CAZ, Sigma-Aldrich), meropenem (MPM, Wako Pure Chemical), tetracycline (TET, Wako Pure Chemical), gentamicin (GEN, Sigma-Aldrich), chloramphenicol (CHL, Wako Pure Chemical), trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (TMS, Wako Pure Chemical), and ciprofloxacin (CIP, Wako Pure Chemical) were determined. Susceptibility testing was conducted using the agar dilution method, according to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guidelines [15 ]. The results obtained were interpreted according to the criteria contained within the CLSI guidelines [16 ,17 ]. Escherichia coli ATCC 25922 was used as a control strain.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Outer Membrane Porin Modulation in E. coli

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All strains used in this study are derived from E. coli K12 W3110. Individual outer membrane porin deleted (W3110ΔompF and W3110ΔompC) and porinless (W3110 ΔompF ΔompC) strains were gift from M. G. P. Page. W3110ΔFC was transformed with the empty pBAD24 vector, or recombinant derivatives containing K. aerogenes omp35 or omp36, E. cloacae ompE35 or ompE36, or K. pneumoniae ompK35 or ompK36. All strains were cultured in Mueller Hinton II Broth or Luria Broth supplemented with ampicillin (100 µg/ml), and protein expression was induced with 0.02% l-arabinose (Sigma) for 2 h at 37 °C. Carbapenems including ertapenem (ETP) and meropenem (MEM), were purchased from Sequoia Research Products Ltd. (United Kingdom); cephalosporins including ceftazidime (CAZ), cefotaxime (CTX), and cefepime (FEP); and penicillins including piperacillin (PIP) and ticarcillin (TIC) were from Sigma. Anhydrous pentane, hexadecane and hexane was purchased from Carl Roth GmbH, Co. 1,2-diphytanoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine (DPhPC), 1-palmitoyl-2-oleoyl-sn-glycerol-3-phosphocholine (POPC), and 1-palmitoyl-2-oleoyl-sn-glycerol-3-phospho-l-serine (POPS) were purchased from Avanti Polar Lipids (Alabama, USA). All solutions were prepared with 18.2 MΩ cm Millipore-grade water unless otherwise noted.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Antimicrobial Susceptibility of B. pseudomallei

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Antimicrobial susceptibility profiles for each strain are listed in Table 1. Minimal inhibitory concentrations (MIC) were first determined by conventional BMD testing following CLSI guidelines for medium, inoculum, and incubation temperature [47 ]. BMD susceptibility testing panels were prepared with Cation-Adjusted Mueller Hinton Broth (CAMHB) in house. β-lactam antibiotics selected for this study were amoxicillin-clavulanic acid (AMC) (Toku-E, Bellingham, WA and USP, Frederick, MD), ceftazidime (CAZ) (Sigma Aldrich, St. Louis, MO) and imipenem (IPM) (Toku-E, Bellingham, WA). Two-fold antibiotic concentrations were tested ranging from 0.06/0.03–128/64 μg/ml AMC, 0.06–128 μg/ml CAZ, and 0.03–64 μg/ml IPM. B. pseudomallei strains were classified as resistant (R), intermediate (I), or susceptible (S) based on interpretive criteria outlined by CLSI [47 ]. MICs were recorded after 16 to 20 h of incubation at 35 °C ambient air, with the exception of MSHR1655 (43 h). Incubation was extended due to insufficient growth in the control well of the BMD panel.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Antibiotic Resistance Screening Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Fecal swabs or stool samples (200 mg) were initially suspended in 2 ml of sterile 0.9% saline. Next, an aliquot of each sample were plated onto four sets of MacConkey media (Merck, Germany): (i) control plate without antibiotics, (ii) biplate agar containing cefotaxime (CTX) (Sigma, USA) and ceftazidime (CAZ) (Sigma, USA) at 1 mg/L concentration to screen for ESBL- and/or pAmpC-producing isolates [17 (link)], (iii) medium containing ciprofloxacin (CIP) (Sigma, USA) at 1 mg/L to screen for FQ-resistant isolates [18 (link)], and (iv) medium supplemented with 1 mg/L ertapenem (ERT) (Sigma, USA) to screen for carbapenem-resistant strains [25 , 26 (link)]. All of the plates were incubated overnight at 37 °C.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Antibiotic Susceptibility Assays

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Susceptibility assays were performed using the broth microdilution (BMD) method and cation-adjusted Mueller-Hinton II broth (Becton, Dickinson and Company, Sparks, MD, USA), following Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute guidelines (55 ), or Etest, following the manufacturer’s (AB bioMérieux, Marcy l’Etoile, France) guidelines. Ceftazidime (CAZ) was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich, and imipenem (IMP) and meropenem (MEM) were bought from the United States Pharmacopeia (Rockville, MD). Avibactam was purchased from Advanced ChemBlocks (Burlingame, CA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Isolation and Identification of Antibiotic-Resistant Enterobacterales

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A total of 25g of each vegetable were obtained with a sterile scalpel and placed in bags containing 225ml of buffered peptone water (BD, Franklin Lakes, NJ, United States). Samples were homogenized in a stomacher (IUL Instruments, Spain) for 1minute and then incubated at 37°C for 18–24h. The same microbiological procedure was followed for water samples after removing the full gauzes from the cassettes and placed them in peptone water. After incubation, two plates with MacConkey agar medium (BD) were inoculated with 100μl from each stomacher bag; one plate was supplemented with 2μg/ml of ceftazidime (CAZ; Sigma, Germany) and the other with 2μg/ml of ciprofloxacin (CIP; Sigma, Germany). In all experiments, K. pneumoniae SCL 2346 (CAZ MIC >16μg/ml and CIP MIC >2μg/ml) and E. coli ATCC 25922 were used as resistant and susceptible controls, respectively. All plates were incubated at 37°C for 18–24h. Colonies were selected according to morphology, using a magnifying glass. This selection was made by classifying the colonies according to standard patterns: colony shape, color (pigmentation), texture, and edge shape, as described previously (Higuera-Llantén et al., 2018 (link)). Distinct morphotypes phenotypically consistent with Enterobacterales were further identified by MALDI-TOF (Bruker Daltonics, Germany).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Antibiotic Susceptibility Assay for Planktonic and Biofilm Bacteria

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) was determined and conducted according to the criteria of the broth microdilution assay of National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards (NCCLS). The planktonic, planktonic-shedding, and biofilm forms susceptibility testing were done in 96-well microtiter plates represented as minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) and minimum biofilm elimination concentration (MBEC) as previously described.7 (link) The ceftazidime (CAZ) (Sigma-Aldrich, USA) antibiotic was serially diluted in Mueller Hinton broth (MHB; Fluka Analytical, USA) within a concentration range of 0.5–1024 μg mL−1 in the final volumes of 50 and 150 μL of media for planktonic and biofilm samples, respectively. Viability values of bacterial cells and associated MIC, and MBEC were determined after 24 h of incubation with antibiotic at 37 °C subsequently reading the sample turbidity at 620 nm on a microtiter plate reader (Teacan, Sunrise, Männedorf, Schweiz). The optical density at 620 nm <0.1 was defined as inhibition.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!