The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

8 protocols using ly6g v450

1

Multicolor Flow Cytometry Immunophenotyping

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Splenocytes were incubated with fluorescently labelled antibodies (CD11b, APC-eFluor 780, BD Bioscience, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA; Ly6G, V450, BD Bioscience, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA; Ly6C, APC, BD Bioscience, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA) at 4 °C for 30 min. Following antibody incubation, cells were washed twice with FACS buffer (PBS, 10% FCS, 0.1% NaN3) before being fixed using the Foxp3/Transcription Factor Staining Buffer Set Kit (eBioscience, Carlsbad, CA, USA). Afterwards, samples were transferred into FACS buffer and analyzed using a LSR II flow cytometer (BD Bioscience) and Flow Jo Version 10 (Tree Star, Ashland, OR, USA). A total number of 50,000 events was analyzed for each sample.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Multiparametric Flow Cytometry Analysis of BAL Leukocytes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Following the centrifugation of BAL fluid to isolate leukocytes, a total cell count was performed using a Neubauer Haemocytometer and trypan blue to exclude dead cells. Samples were then treated with anti-CD16/32 (BD Pharmingen) and stained at 4 °C for 25 min with the following pre conjugated mAbs against the indicated antigens: MHCII-FITC, NK1.1-FITC, CD4-PerCP Cy 5.5, CD11c-PECy7, B220-PE Texas Red, Ly6G-V450, CD44-V450, TCRβ-APC, CD11b-APCCy7, CD3-APC (all BD Biosciences); 7/4-PE (AbD Serotec), CD8-PECy7 (Invitrogen), F4/80-APC (Invitrogen). Samples were then washed before analysis on a CyAn™ ADP Flow cytometer using Summit software (Beckman Coulter). Cell subsets were defined as the following: eosinophils (F4/80intCD11bintSSChi), 7/4 monocytes (F4/80lowCD11bintSSClow7/4), 7/4+ monocytes (F4/80lowCD11bintSSClow7/4+), myeloid dendritic cells (DCs) (CD11b+CD11c+MHCII+), CD4+ T cells (CD3+αβTCR+CD4+), CD8+ T cells (CD3+αβTCR+CD8+), NK (NK1.1+αβTCRCD3) and NKT (NK1.1+αβTCR+CD3+) cells.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Immune Cell Profiling in Murine Bone Marrow, Spleen, and Lymph Nodes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Immune cell populations in the bone marrow, spleen, and inguinal lymph nodes of female mice 8 weeks after OVX or sham surgery were determined via flow cytometric analysis. Inguinal lymph nodes and spleen were explanted and passed through a cell strainer (70 µm). The ends of the femur were removed, and bone marrow was centrifuged out (12,300 rpm for 40 s) and resuspended in phosphate-buffered saline. Lysis of erythrocytes of spleen and bone marrow samples was performed by using lysis buffer (150 nM NH4CL, 1 mM KHCO3, 0.1 mM Na2EDTA, all Sigma-Aldrich) for 5 min at 37 °C. Cells were stained with the following antibodies for 30 min on ice: F4/80 FITC (1:50, eBioscience, Frankfurt, Germany), Ly6G V450 (1:400, BD Bioscience, Heidelberg, Germany), CD11b Alexa Fluor 700 (1:400), CD3e PE-Xyanine7 (1:100), CD4 APC-eFluor 780 (1:200), CD8a APC (1:800), and CD19 PE (1:400, all eBioscience). Corresponding isotype controls were used. Live–dead discrimination was performed with 7-aminoactinmycin D. A BD FACSLyric flow cytometer (BD Bioscience) was used for sample measurement, and FlowJo software (10.0.8r1, FlowJo, Ashland, OR, USA) was used for analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Quantifying ADAMTS1 in Muscle Macrophages

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Muscle tissue was isolated from the mice and the fascia was sacrificed. Mononuclear cells were isolated from hind limb muscles that were finely minced and enzymatically digested with 0.2% collagenase II as described above in the satellite cell isolation section. The mononuclear cells were stained with the following antibodies: Ly6G-V450 (BD Bioscience, 1:75, clone1A8), F4/80-FITC (Biolegend, 1:75, clone BM8), CD11b-APC-Cy7 (BD Bioscience, 1:100, clone M1170) and Ly-6C-APC (Ebioscience; 1:75, clone 4K1.4). To quantify the level of ADAMTS1 in macrophages by flow cytometry, cells were co-stained with ADAMTS1 antibody (R&D Systems, 1:50, clone CDSL0115031). To quantify ADAMTS1 levels in macrophages after muscle injury, injured muscles were harvested day 1 post injury. Cells were analyzed and purified by FACS using a BD FACSAria II.
To confirm the co-localization of ADAMTS1 with macrophages by histology, cryosections of TA muscles were stained with F4/80-FITC (Biolegend, 1:75, clone BM8) and ADAMTS1 antibody (1:500 Santa Cruz Biotech, 1:500, clone A19) at 4 °C overnight. The sections were washed and incubated with fluorescent-dye conjugated secondary antibodies (1:1000, Invitrogen) for 30 min at room temperature. The sections were covered with antifade mounting medium (Vector Laboratories) and imaged.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Profiling Chi3l1-binding Liver NPCs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Isolated liver NPCs were incubated with1 μl of anti-mouse FcγRII/III (Becton Dickinson, Franklin Lakes, NJ) to minimize non-specific antibody binding. The cells were then stained with anti-mouse CD45-V655 (eBioscience, 15520837), F4/80-APC/Cy7 (Biolegend, 123118), Ly6C-APC (BD Pharmingen, 560595), Ly6G-V450 (BD Pharmingen, 560603), CD146-PerCP-Cy5.5 (BD Pharmingen, 562134), CD44-PE (BD Pharmingen, 553134), anti-His-FITC (abcam, ab1206). In some experiments, cells were incubated with 2 μg rmChi3l1 for 2 hr before antibody staining. The cells were analyzed on a CytoFLEX LX Flow Cytometer (Beckman Coulter, Indianapolis, IN) using FlowJo software (Tree Star, Ashland, OR). For flow cytometric analysis, CD45+ cells were gated to exclude endothelial cells, hepatic stellate cells, and residue hepatocytes. Within CD45+ cells, CD44+ cells that bind to Chi3l1 were back-gated to determine the cells types.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Immune Cell Analysis in Aged Mice

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To analyze immune cells (innate and adaptive) in the spleen, bone marrow or inguinal lymph nodes of 6- and 12-month-old MlklWT/WT, Mlkl–/–, Ripk3WT/WT, and Ripk3–/– mice, single-cell suspensions were subjected to osmotic red blood cell lysis and incubated with a combination of antibodies: CD4-BV421 (BD Biosciences #562891), CD8-PeCy7 (BD Biosciences #561097), CD19-PerCPCy5.5 (BD Biosciences #551001), CD11b-BV510 (BD Biosciences #562950) or CD11b-BV786 (BD Biosciences #740861), CD45-Alexa700 (BD Biosciences #560566), Ly6G-V450 (BD Biosciences #560603) and Ly6C-APCCy7 (BD Biosciences #560596). Samples were analyzed on an Aurora Cytex flow cytometer, with the automated volume calculator used to quantify absolute cell numbers. FlowJo v10.8 was used for all analyses.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Isolation and Analysis of Brain Tumor Immune Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Isolated brain tumour tissue was digested in cysteine-activated papain (Worthington, 50 U ml−1 in HBSS, pH 7) with 300 U ml−1 DNAse for 5 min at 37 °C, triturated, and strained through a 70 µm strainer. Cell suspension was resuspended in HBSS and subsequently underlayed with 35 and 70% Percoll (GE Healthcare) and centrifuged for 15 min at 800 × g. Interphase between layers was collected and washed using PBS with 1% bovine serum albumin and 0.1% NaN3. After Fc receptor blocking (TruStain FcX™ (Clone 93) #101320, BioLegend), cells were incubated with fluorochrome-conjugated primary antibodies at 1:100 dilution. Antibodies for flow cytometry (V450-Ly6G, #560603; PE-Cy7-Ly6C #560593; PerCP-Cy™5.5-CD11b #550993; and APC-CD45 #559864) were purchased from BD Biosciences. The gating strategy is depicted in Supplementary Fig. 1: we selected CD11bhiCD45+ population and separated Ly6G+ neutrophils and Ly6C+ newly infiltrated monocytes. The CD45lowLy6Clow population is microglial cells and the CD45hiLy6Clow population is cells of myeloid origin, differentiated TAMs. Analysis was performed using CytoFLEX platform (Beckman Coulter) with CytExpert software. Analysis of data was performed using FlowJo software. Fluorescence-activated cell sorting was performed using Sony SH800 cell sorter to collect GFP+ and GFP populations from NeuroD2:SmoA1;Atoh1:GFP tumours.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Antibodies and Reagents for DNA Damage Response

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The anti‐α‐tubulin antibody, aphidicolin, and nocodazole were purchased from Sigma‐Aldrich. The anti‐p‐ATM (Ser1981), cGAS, and GFP antibody were from Santa Cruz. Antibodies against ATM, Flag, mouse cGAS, human cGAS, STING, MRE11, PARP1, H2A, H2A.X, γ‐H2A.X p‐IRF3, and IRF3 were from Cell Signaling Technology; Alexa 488‐anti‐Sca‐1 was from Invitrogen and PECY7‐anti‐cKit; V450‐Ly6G and FITC‐anti‐GR1 were from BD Pharmingen; 2′,3′‐cGAMP and immunostimulatory DNA (ISD) were from InvivoGen; and ATP was from New England Biology, while GTP, Rad51, and Lamin B1 antibody were from Abcam.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!