The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Genemapper 5

Manufactured by Thermo Fisher Scientific
Sourced in United States

GeneMapper 5.0 is a software application developed by Thermo Fisher Scientific for DNA fragment analysis. It is designed to analyze DNA fragments generated from various genetic analysis techniques, including capillary electrophoresis-based sequencing and fragment analysis.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

67 protocols using genemapper 5

1

Detecting Splice Variants in Transfected HEK 293T Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
RT-PCR from cDNA obtained from HEK 293 T cells (ATCC, Teddington, UK) transfected with plasmid constructs harboring the mutant c.1663-1205A-allele was performed with a 5′ FAM (6-carboxyfluorescein) labeled forward primer located in exon 14 (5-CCGTTCTCTATTTGCCTGGT-3´) and a reverse primer located in the pSPL3 tat2 exon (5-GATCCATTCGACCAATTCACT-3´) using the AmpliTaqGold polymerase (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Karlsruhe, Germany). FAM-labeled RT-PCR products were diluted 1:100 in water, mixed with 1 μl of GeneScan ROX500 size standard (Life Technologies, Darmstadt, Germany) and 8 μl of Hi-Di Formamide (Life Technologies) in a total volume of 10 μl. Mixes were separated by capillary electrophoresis on an ABI 3130XL Genetic Analyzer instrument (Life Technologies). The area-under-the-curve (AUC) was calculated with GeneMapper 5 (Life Technologies) software. Ratios of splicing products were determined as the AUC for individual peaks divided by the sum of AUC of all differentially spliced products.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Plasmid Linearization and Sequencing

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Plasmid pEGFP-BSf (500 ng) pre-hybridized with bisLNA (4 μM, 72 h) was digested with S1 nuclease following protocol described above. After digestion, the samples were purified using Spin columns (Qiagen PCR purification kit) according to the manufacturers protocol. The plasmids were subsequently linearized using NdeI and SacI (Fermentas). Primer extension was carried out under the following conditions: [2 mM MgCl2, 3 U Taq polymerase (Fermentas), 2.5 nM primer, 2 mM of each dNTP. Ten minutes at 94°C, 29 cycles of 1 min at 94°C, 2 min at 45°C, 3 min at 72°C and finally 10 min at 72°C. Primer sequence: 5′ 6FAM-AAA TGG GCG GTA GGC GT 3′ (Cybergene)]. Plasmid was sequenced using Thermo Sequenase Primer Dye Manual Cycle Sequencing kit (Affymetrix). For each sample, 5 μl of the PCR reaction, 4.75 μl of HiDi (Life Technologies) and 0.25 μl of GeneScan 600-LIZ (Life Technologies) were analyzed using ABI 3730 DNA Analyzer (injection voltage 3 kV, 30 s). The electropherograms were analyzed with GeneMapper 5 (Life Technologies) and horizontally aligned in the sample plot window through the use of the size stan­dard. The reactions from the Thermo Sequenase kit were superimposed and aligned to the digestion samples to read the sequence.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Microsatellite Genotyping of Brook Trout

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Genomic DNA was extracted using the Mag‐Bind ® Tissue DNA Kit (Omega Bio‐tek) with the KingFisher Flex Magnetic Particle Processor (Thermo Fisher Scientific) as well as the Puregene (Gentra Systems, Inc.) methods, following the manufacturers’ protocols. Samples were genotyped at 12 microsatellite markers developed in Brook Trout: SfoB52, SfoC38, SfoC113, SfoD75, SfoD100, SfoC28, SfoC86, SfoC88, SfoC129, SfoC24, SfoC115, and SfoD91 (King, Lubinski, Burnham‐Curtis, Stott, & Morgan, 2012). Markers were combined into three multiplex reactions for PCR amplification and fragment analysis. Each 15 µl PCR consisted of 1.5 µl genomic DNA extract, 1.5× PCR buffer, 3.75 mM MgCl2, 0.3175 mM dNTPs, 0.08–0.18 µM of each primer, and 0.08 units/µl GoTaq® Flexi DNA polymerase (Promega). The amplification protocol followed that of King et al. (2012). PCR products were then visualized on an ABI 3130XL genetic analyzer (Life Technologies), and alleles were scored with GeneMapper 5 (Life Technologies) by two independent readers. As a quality control measure, 10% of the samples were re‐extracted and genotyped to compare against the original data.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Quantitative RT-PCR Analysis of Genetic Variants

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Four hundred ng of total RNA isolated from blood samples was used for cDNA synthesis using random hexamers and the Maxima H Minus Reverse Transcriptase according to the manufacturer’s protocol (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Carlsbad, USA). For the analysis of variants c.1065+6T>C and c.1212+4del, reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) was performed using 2 μl cDNA, a forward primer located in exon 7 (5´- TGGAACGATTAGAAAAGGAGAACAAAG-3´), a 5′ FAM (6-carboxyfluorescein) labeled reverse primer located in exon 14 (5´- CCATGAGGGTCCATTTGACT-3´), and standard PCR conditions (35 cycles). For the analysis of variant c.1516+3A>G, a forward primer located in exon 11 (5´- GAACTTCGAATGAGGAAAAATGTGA-3´) and a 5′ FAM (6-carboxyfluorescein) labeled reverse primer located in exon 17 (5´- TGTTGTTCAACAGACTCTCGTACCAT-3´) was used.
FAM-labeled RT-PCR products were mixed with 0.5 μl of GeneScan ROX500 size standard (Life Technologies, Darmstadt, Germany) and 8.5 μl of Hi-Di Formamide (Life Technologies) in a total volume of 10 μl. Mixes were separated by capillary electrophoresis on an ABI 3130XL Genetic Analyzer instrument (Life Technologies). The area-under-the-curve (AUC) was calculated with GeneMapper 5 (Life Technologies) software. Ratios of RT-PCR products were determined as the AUC for individual peaks divided by the sum of AUC of all peaks.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

RT-PCR Splicing Product Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
First strand cDNA synthesis was performed using 2 μg of total RNA and random hexamer primers. Subsequent PCR was performed with a 5′ FAM (6-carboxyfluorescein) labeled forward primer and using the QIAGEN Multiplex PCR Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). FAM-labeled RT-PCR products were diluted 1:10 in water; mixed with 1 μl of GeneScan ROX500 size standard (Life Technologies, Darmstadt, Germany) and 8 μl of Hi-Di Formamide (Life Technologies) in a total volume of 10 μl. Mixes were separated by capillary electrophoresis on an ABI 3130XL Genetic Analyzer instrument (Life Technologies). The area-under-the-curve (AUC) was calculated with GeneMapper 5 (Life Technologies) software. Ratios of splicing products were determined as the AUC for individual peaks divided by the sum of AUC of all differentially spliced products.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

STR Profiling of iPSCs and PBMCs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Genomic DNA of iPSCs (p52) and patient’s PBMCs was extracted using Quick-DNA Miniprep Plus Kit (Zymo Research). STRs were amplified using the PowerPlex16 (Promega) system and resolved on a ABI 3730xl Genetic Analyzer (Thermo Fischer Scientific). GeneMapper 5.0 (Thermo Fischer) software was used to call the genotype at each locus and compare between peripheral blood and iPSC samples.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

iPSC and PBMC Genomic DNA Profiling

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Genomic DNA was extracted from iPSCs (passages 14–15) and PBMCs using the Quick-DNA Miniprep Plus Kit (Zymo Research). The PowerPlex 16 System (Promega) was then utilized to amplify genomic materials according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Samples were sent for capillary sequencing using an ABI 3730xl Genetic Analyzer (Thermo Fisher Scientific). GeneMapper 5.0 (Thermo Fisher Scientific) software was used to analyze the sequencing data for allele callings for 16 loci per sample. Only strong allele calling signals were considered for analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

STR Profiling of iPSCs and PBMCs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Genomic DNA of iPSCs (p52) and patient’s PBMCs was extracted using Quick-DNA Miniprep Plus Kit (Zymo Research). STRs were amplified using the PowerPlex16 (Promega) system and resolved on a ABI 3730xl Genetic Analyzer (Thermo Fischer Scientific). GeneMapper 5.0 (Thermo Fischer) software was used to call the genotype at each locus and compare between peripheral blood and iPSC samples.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

iPSC and PBMC Genomic DNA Profiling

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Genomic DNA was extracted from iPSCs (passages 14–15) and PBMCs using the Quick-DNA Miniprep Plus Kit (Zymo Research). The PowerPlex 16 System (Promega) was then utilized to amplify genomic materials according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Samples were sent for capillary sequencing using an ABI 3730xl Genetic Analyzer (Thermo Fisher Scientific). GeneMapper 5.0 (Thermo Fisher Scientific) software was used to analyze the sequencing data for allele callings for 16 loci per sample. Only strong allele calling signals were considered for analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Microsatellite-based Fluorescent PCR Assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A fluorescent PCR assay was used to amplify the EmsB microsatellite, following a previous protocol [34 (link)]. Fragment analysis of PCR products was performed by capillary electrophoresis on an automatic sequencer (ABI Prism 310 and ABI 3500/3730; Life Technologies, CA). The resulting EmsB electropherograms were composed of several peaks between 209 and 241 bp. The size (base-pair length) and height (fluorescent signal intensity) of peaks present in each EmsB electropherogram were determined using GeneMapper 5.0 (Life Technologies, CA). Characterization of each EmsB profile was performed as described in the EmsB guidelines from the EWET database (https://ewet-db.univ-fcomte.fr/) [40 (link)]. Briefly, peaks below 10% of the sample's maximum peak height were considered artefacts and discarded. To normalize raw data, the height of each peak was divided by the sum of the height of all peaks of a given sample.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!