The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

10 protocols using anti mre11

1

ATM/DNA-PK Regulation of DDR Signaling

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
HCT116 Flp-In T-REx cells were treated with 10 μg/mL doxycycline (Dox) for 16 hr to induce the expression of homeodomain proteins. KU-55933 (EMD Millipore) and NU-7441 (R&D Pharmaceuticals; 3712) were used to treat cells for 1 hr for ATM or DNA-PK inhibition, respectively. DNA-damaging agents and hydrogen peroxide treatments were used to treat cells as indicated in figure legends. After treatment, cells were scraped into PBS and centrifuged at 800 × g for 2 min. Cells were lysed with cell lysis buffer, and lysates were clarified at 10,000 × g for 10 min. The protein concentrations of the lysates were quantified using Bradford assay, and protein levels were normalized for all samples. Primary antibodies used were anti-ATM (Santa Cruz), anti-phospho-Ser1981-ATM (Abcam), anti-Kap1 (Abcam; ab22553), anti-phospho-Ser824-Kap1 (Bethyl Laboratories; A300–767A), anti-Nbs1 (Genetex; GTX70224), anti-Rad50 (Genetex; GTX70228), anti-Mre11 (Genetex; GTX70212), anti-MBP (Rockland; 200–401–385), anti-Flag (Sigma; A1205), anti-β-actin (Cell Signaling; 4970), anti-Chk2 (Genetex; GTX70295), anti-phospho-Thr68-Chk2 (Cell Signaling; 2661S), anti-phospho-Ser15-p53 (Abcam; ab1431), and anti-phospho-Ser15-p53 (mouse) (Assay Biotech; A7180). Alexa Fluor 68-anti-rabbit and IRDye 800 anti-mouse were the secondary antibodies used. Membranes were scanned and quantified using the Odyssey system (Li-Cor).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Immunofluorescence Analysis of DNA Damage

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were pre-extracted with 0.05% or 0.25% Triton X-100 in PBS for 5 min on ice, fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde in PBS for 10 min at RT, washed with PBS, post-extracted in 0.25% Triton X-100 in PBS for 10 min at RT and blocked with 3% bovine serum albumin (BSA) in PBS. The cells were subsequently incubated at 37°C for 1 h with anti-γH2AX (Cell Signaling Technology, #9718), anti-RPA2 (Abcam, ab2175), anti-Mre11 (GeneTex, GTX70212), anti-trimethyl-histone H3 (Lys9) (Merck, 07442) or anti-HP1β (Cell Signaling Technology, #8676) diluted in PBS containing 3% BSA and 0.05% Tween 20. The cells were subsequently washed three times and incubated with secondary antibodies conjugated to the appropriate fluorophore (Alexa-488 or Alexa-594) for 1 h at RT. After three additional washes, the cells were stained with 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) and mounted with Vectashield (Vector Laboratories). Proximity ligase assays (PLAs) were performed with the indicated primary antibodies diluted 1:500 (SMARCAL1 and HP1α; Merck, 05-689) and Duolink In Situ PLA kits (Sigma-Aldrich). Immunofluorescence images were obtained with a fluorescence microscope (BZ-9000, Keyence) or a confocal laser scanning microscope (TCS SP8, Leica).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Antibody Panel for DNA Damage Response

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Following antibodies were used in this study at the indicated concentration. Anti-phospho histone H2AX (Ser139) (γH2AX) (clone JBW301, EMD Millipore, 05–636, 1:1500 IF) (Cell Signaling Technologies, 2577, 1:1000 IF), anti-TOPBP1 (Bethyl Laboratories, A300–111A, 1:2000 IF, 1:2000 IB) (Abcam, ab2402, 1:1000 IF), anti-MDC1 (Abcam ab11171, 1:1000 IF, 1:1000 IB), anti-CIP2A (clone 2G10–3B5; Santa Cruz sc80659, 1:500 IF, 1:1000 IB), anti-GAPDH (clone 14C10, Cell Signaling Technologies, 1:5000 IB), anti-PolD3 (clone 3E2, Abnova, H00010714-M01, 1:1000 IB), anti-Lig4 (clone N2C2, GeneTex, GTX100100, 1:1000 IB), anti-Mre11 (clone 12D7, GeneTex, GTX70212, 1:1000), anti-Rad50 (Cell Signaling Technologies, 3427, 1:1000 IB), anti-HA-tag (Novus biologicals, NB600–363, 1:2000 IB), anti-Lamin A/C (clone E-1, Santa Cruz, sc-376248, 1:200 IF), anti-Lamin B1 (clone C-5, Santa Cruz, sc-365962, 1:200 IF), anti-53BP1 (Thermo Fisher Scientific, PA1–16565, 1:1000 IF), anti-BRCA1 (clone D-9, Santa Cruz, sc-6954, 1:1000 IF).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Protein Extraction and Western Blot Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For preparation of protein extracts, cells were lysed in cell extraction buffer (50 mM Tris pH 7,4, 150 mM NaCl, 2 mM EGTA, 2 mM EDTA, 25 mM NaF, 0.1 mM Na3VO4, 0.1 mM PMSF, 2 mg/ml Leupeptin, 2 mg/ml Aprotinin, 0.2% Triton X-100, 0.3% NonidetP-40) for 30 min on ice. Protein extracts were cleared through centrifugation at 16100 rcf for 15 min, and supernatants were separated through SDS-PAGE and transferred to nitrocellulose membranes. Antibodies to NBN, SMC1-pS966, KAP1-pS824 were obtained from Novus Biologicals (rabbit polyclonal); anti CHEK2-pS19 from Cell Signaling (rabbit polyclonal); anti RAD50 (mouse monoclonal) from Abcam; anti MRE11 (mouse monoclonal 12D7) from GeneTex; PARP1 and cleaved PARP1 (rabbit polyclonal) from Cell Signaling, and anti β-Actin (mouse monoclonal) from Sigma. Anti-mouse and anti-rabbit horseradish peroxidases labelled secondary antibodies were purchased from GE Healthcare. Visualization of immunoreactive bands was performed by using ECL (Thermo Scientific/Pierce), and their intensity was determined using ImageJ quantitation software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

ATM/DNA-PK Regulation of DDR Signaling

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
HCT116 Flp-In T-REx cells were treated with 10 μg/mL doxycycline (Dox) for 16 hr to induce the expression of homeodomain proteins. KU-55933 (EMD Millipore) and NU-7441 (R&D Pharmaceuticals; 3712) were used to treat cells for 1 hr for ATM or DNA-PK inhibition, respectively. DNA-damaging agents and hydrogen peroxide treatments were used to treat cells as indicated in figure legends. After treatment, cells were scraped into PBS and centrifuged at 800 × g for 2 min. Cells were lysed with cell lysis buffer, and lysates were clarified at 10,000 × g for 10 min. The protein concentrations of the lysates were quantified using Bradford assay, and protein levels were normalized for all samples. Primary antibodies used were anti-ATM (Santa Cruz), anti-phospho-Ser1981-ATM (Abcam), anti-Kap1 (Abcam; ab22553), anti-phospho-Ser824-Kap1 (Bethyl Laboratories; A300–767A), anti-Nbs1 (Genetex; GTX70224), anti-Rad50 (Genetex; GTX70228), anti-Mre11 (Genetex; GTX70212), anti-MBP (Rockland; 200–401–385), anti-Flag (Sigma; A1205), anti-β-actin (Cell Signaling; 4970), anti-Chk2 (Genetex; GTX70295), anti-phospho-Thr68-Chk2 (Cell Signaling; 2661S), anti-phospho-Ser15-p53 (Abcam; ab1431), and anti-phospho-Ser15-p53 (mouse) (Assay Biotech; A7180). Alexa Fluor 68-anti-rabbit and IRDye 800 anti-mouse were the secondary antibodies used. Membranes were scanned and quantified using the Odyssey system (Li-Cor).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Western Blot Analysis of DNA Repair Proteins

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Western blots were performed with primary antibodies anti-RAD50 (GTX70228, Genetex, Irvine, CA, USA), anti-MRE11 (GTX70212, Genetex, Irvine, CA, USA), anti-NBS1 (GTX70224, Genetex, Irvine, CA, USA), anti-6xHIS (#12698, Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, MA, USA), anti-α-tubulin (GTX112141, Genetex, Irvine, CA, USA), and anti-P84 (GTX70220, Genetex, Irvine, CA, USA), as described previously [36 (link),37 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Characterization of Telomeric Protein Complexes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Whole cell and nuclear extracts were prepared as described previously63 (link). Western blot analysis was performed as described64 (link) with the following primary antibodies: anti-TRF1 (#5745, 0.5 μg/ml)63 (link), anti-TRF2 (4A794, 2.5 μg/ml, Novus Biologicals, Littleton, CO, USA), anti-POT1 (#978, 1:1,000, provided by Dr. Titia de Lange), anti-TIN2 (1:1,500, provided by Dr. Zhou Songyang), anti-TPP1 (#467, 1:1,000, provided by Zhou Songyang), anti-RAP1 (1:1,000, provided by Zhou Songyang), anti-RIF1 (#1060, 1:1,000, provided by Titia de Lange), anti-dyskerin (H-300, 2 μg/ml, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Dallas, TX, USA), anti-MRE11 (12D7, 1:500, GeneTex, Irvine, CA, USA), anti-RAD50 (13B3, 1:1,000, GeneTex), anti-NBS1 (#3002, 1:1,000, Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, MA, USA), anti-BLM (ab476, 1:2,000, Abcam, Cambridge, UK), anti-WRN (ab200, 1:2,000, Abcam), anti-ATM (2C1, 2 μg/ml, Santa Cruz Biotechnology), anti-PARP-1 (C2-10, 1:2,000, Pharmingen, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA), anti-tankyrase-1 (H-350, 2 μg/ml, Santa Cruz Biotechnology), anti-glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH; RDI-TRK5G4-6C5, 0.5 μg/ml, Research Diagnostics, Flanders, NJ, USA), anti-α-tubulin (B-5-1-2, 1:1,000, Sigma), anti-lamin A/C (636, 2 μg/ml, Santa Cruz Biotechnology) and anti-hTERT (1531-1/Y182, 1:1,000, Abcam). Images were processed with Photoshop CS5 (Adobe).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Immunofluorescence Staining of Adenovirus Proteins

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were fixed (10min, 22°C) in 4% paraformaldehyde/PBS (made from 16%(w/v) formaldehyde; TAAB, UK), followed by permeabilization (10min, 22°C) in Triton buffer (0.5% Triton X-100, 20mM Hepes KOH pH7.9, 50mM NaCl, 3mM MgCl2, 300mM Sucrose). Cells were blocked in 0.05% Tween-20/3% BSA/PBS (15min, 22°C) and incubated (overnight, 4°C) in primary antibodies diluted in blocking buffer. Antibodies used: mouse monoclonal anti-Ad-DBP (37.3) (a gift from K. Benihoud, Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France), rabbit polyclonal anti-phospho-histoneH2A.X (Ser139) (Cell Signalling Technology, MA), mouse monoclonal anti-E1A and/or rabbit polyclonal anti-Mre11 (Genetex Inc., CA). Coverslips were washed twice in blocking buffer and incubated (1h, 22°C) in secondary antibodies (goat anti-mouse or anti-rabbit AlexaFluor® 594 and/or goat anti-mouse AlexaFluor® 488) diluted in blocking buffer.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Antibody Characterization for DNA Damage Response

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Primary antibodies used in this study were as follows (Table S1): Anti-RecQL4 antibody was prepared by Abfrontier by immunizing rabbits with recombinant N-terminal (amino acid residues 1–241) RecQL4. Other antibodies used in this study were as follows: Anti-pATM (Ser-1981, #4526, Cell Signaling), anti-Mre11 (GTX30294, GeneTex), anti-Nbs1 (A7703, ABclonal), anti-Rad50 (sc-74460, Santa Cruz), anti-Rad51 (GTX100469, GeneTex), anti-RPA32 (MABE-286, EMD Millipore), anti-Usp28 (A9292, ABclonal), anti-Skp2 (sc-7164, Santa Cruz), anti-γH2AX (A300-081A, Bethyl and 05-636, EMD Millipore), anti-lamin B1 (ab16048, Abcam), anti-GAPDH (sc25778, Santa Cruz), anti-FLAG M2 (Sigma), and anti-HA (AE008, ABclonal). The following antibodies were used as secondary antibodies in immunofluorescence microscopy: Alexa Fluor 488 anti-mouse IgG (A11001, Thermo Fisher), Alexa Fluor 488 anti-rabbit IgG (A11008, Thermo Fisher), Alexa Fluor 594 anti-mouse IgG (A11005, Thermo Fisher), and Alexa Fluor 594 anti-rabbit IgG (A11012, Thermo Fisher).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Antibody Detection in Cell Signaling

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Antibodies used in our study are as follows: mouse monoclonal anti‐DHFR (Abnova, Taipei, Taiwan), anti‐Cyclin B (Santa Cruz Biotechnology Inc., TX), anti‐MRE11 (GeneTex, Hsinchu, Taiwan), anti‐γH2AX (Millipore, MA), anti‐CDK1 (Cell Signaling, Boston) and anti‐GAPDH (Kang Chen Bio‐tech, Shanghai, China); rabbit monoclonal anti‐BRCA1, anti‐RAD51 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology Inc., TX) and anti‐Histone H3 (Abcam, Cambridge, UK); CF488 goat anti‐mouse IgG and CF488 goat anti‐rabbit IgG (Biotium, CA); IRDye 800 conjugated affinity purified anti‐mouse IgG and IRDye 700 conjugated affinity purified anti‐rabbit IgG (Rockland, Philadelphia).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!