The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Office excel 2010

Manufactured by IBM
Sourced in United States

Office Excel 2010 is a spreadsheet software application developed by Microsoft. It provides tools for organizing, calculating, and analyzing data in a tabular format. The core function of Excel 2010 is to enable users to create, manage, and manipulate spreadsheets for various purposes, such as budgeting, data tracking, and financial analysis.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

31 protocols using office excel 2010

1

Coagulopathy Prevalence and Mortality

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Coagulopathy was defined as PT >18 s (or INR >1.2) and/or aPTT > 36 s [4 (link), 6 (link), 7 (link)]. Coded data were entered in Microsoft® Office Excel 2010 and SPSS® statistical software version 21 and analyzed. Relationships between categorical variables were established using chi-square test. Relationship between quantitative variables was established using z-test for mean between two samples and Student’s t-test of two samples assuming unequal variances, whichever applicable. Correlations were established using Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient (r2) and t-test of probability for correlation coefficient. The multiple logistic regression analysis was used to ascertain the association between the initial coagulation parameters and overall hospital mortality. The results were considered statistically significant when “P” value was ≤ 0.05.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Statistical Analysis of Genetic Knockdowns

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Statistical analyses for Indy/CeNAC2 knock down and fat content were performed by Wilcoxon test. For comparing significant distributions between different groups in the life span assays statistical calculations were carried out using the log-rank rest (Kaplan Meier) as well as the χ2-Test. Given data shows mean values ±SEM if not described otherwise. All calculations were performed using Microsoft Office Excel 2010 and SPSS version 20.0. Experiments were performed in triplicate except where stated otherwise. Error measures were calculated form the variability of the independently prepared biological samples of the same treatment group where applicable. Differences were considered statistically significant at p < 0.05, therey indicating a probability of error lower than 5%.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Visual Acuity Statistical Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Data was collected on Microsoft Office Excel 2010, whereas statistical analysis was performed with SPSS 19.0 software. VAs were recorded and converted from Snellen to Log MAR for statistical analysis.21 (link) The results were checked for normal distribution using a histogram and Shapiro–Wilk test.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Statistical Analysis of Experimental Data

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Data were entered into Microsoft Office Excel 2010, cleaned and analysed using SPSS version 20.0. To identify statistical significant variables, a chi-square test with P=0.05 significance levels was employed.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Hematological Changes Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Data were entered in Microsoft Office Excel 2010 and then imputed in software for SPSS version 19 for analysis. Frequency and percentages were calculated for age, gender, skeletal changes, liver changes, splenic changes, and cardiac involvement, while mean and standard deviation for Hb, MCV, age, and serum ferritin.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Evaluating Training Effectiveness with Statistical Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Data were presented as frequencies with percentages for categorical variables and means with SDs or median (interquartile range) for continuous variables. Differences in categorical outcomes were assessed using McNemar's test. The Normal distribution was confirmed using the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test. Differences between pre-training and post-training were compared using the Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed-rank test for continuous variables with non-parametric distribution and the paired sample t-test for continuous variables with normal distribution. We use the Bonferroni correction to control the type I error rate when multiple testing is performed (20 (link)). All statistics were managed by Office Excel 2010 and analyzed using SPSS 24.0. Two-sided p-values < 0.05 were considered significant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Diagnostic Accuracy Assessment Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Data were recorded using Microsoft Office Excel 2010 and analyzed using SPSS software v17.0. Sensitivity and specificity were calculated by using the true and false positive and/or negative fraction and standard formulas. Wilcoxon signed rank test was used to compare the data. A P value of <0.05 has been taken as statistically significant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Triplicate Data Analysis Across Disciplines

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All experiments and analyses were carried out in triplicate and data represent the mean values. Microsoft Office Excel 2010 and SPSS (17.0) software were used for data analysis. One‐way ANOVA and independent‐sample t test were used for statistical analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Evaluating Prioritization Criteria for COVID-19 Risk Groups

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All data were entered in Microsoft Office Excel 2010 and average Likert-scores and
standard deviations were calculated using SPSS for the importance rating of thirty-two
criteria (part B) and the importance of prioritizing certain risk groups (part D). For the
analysis of the ranking exercises, a criterion received ten points when ranked in first
place, nine in second place, etcetera, and zero points when ranked below the
10th place. Average ranking scores and standard deviations were calculated for
each criterion. For part D, the reasons for prioritizing a risk group were entered in
Excel and the frequency was counted accordingly.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Comparative Analysis of Psychological Assessments

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Data collected in this research will be stored and processed in computerized database using the Microsoft Office Excel 2010 and Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) version 20.0 software. Descriptive and inferential statistics of collected variables will be performed, and data will be presented through tables, charts and figures.
Statistical analysis of comparison and correlation of data obtained will be performed. The Kolmogorov-Smirnov test will be performed to analyze sample normality. Likewise, Pearson or Spearman tests will be used for correlational analyses. Categorical variables will be analyzed using the chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test. To compare the KAI and STAI assessment with the intervention and control groups, Student’s t-test will be applied. Comparing the IAC and IDATE classification with the group of intervention and control, the chi-square test (χ²) will be applied. Being adopted throughout the study a significance level of 5% at which p = 0.05.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!