The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

5 protocols using anti cd3 af488

1

Comprehensive Immune Cell Profiling

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All antibody staining was preceded by 15 min of 1:50 FcγR block in FC buffer, on ice. Extracellular antibodies were then added to FC buffer containing FcγR block, and incubated for 45 min on ice. Intracellular staining was accomplished after surface staining using the Foxp3 staining kit (eBioscience). Myeloid subsets were stained with anti-CD1lb-FITC, anti-Ly6C-AF700, anti-MR-PE-Cy7, anti-CD11c-PE/Dazzle594, anti-Ly6G-BV605 (BioLegend), anti-MHCII-eFluor450 (eBioscience), and anti-F4/80-APC (BioRad). To evaluate Tregs, cells were stained with anti-CD3-AF488, anti-CD4-APC, anti-CD25-PerCP-Cy5.5 (BioLegend), and anti-Foxp3-PE (BD Pharmingen). To assess T cell activation, total tumor cells were incubated for 4 hr at 37°C in a 5% CO2 incubator with Protein Transport Inhibitor Cocktail containing brefeldin A and monensin, or with Cell Stimulation Cocktail containing protein transport inhibitors and PMA/ionomycin (eBioscience). Cells were then stained with anti-CD3-AF488, anti-CD4-PE, and anti-CD8-PerCP-Cy5.5 followed by intracellular stain with anti-IFNγ-APC (BioLegend). In addition, 1E5 CD3+ cells were stimulated with 4E4 CD3/CD28 Dynabeads (ThermoFisher) for 3 days, followed by staining using anti-CD3-PerCP-Cy5.5, anti-CD8-BV650, anti-CD4-BV605, anti-IFNγ-APC, anti-TNFα-BV421 (BioLegend), and anti-GranzymeB-PE (eBioscience).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Multiparametric Flow Cytometry of Immune Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Tumors were dissociated as for cell inoculation and subjected to flow cytometry (FC) analysis, gating on live cells lacking staining with Live/Dead Aqua (ThermoFischer). All antibody staining was preceded by FcγR block on ice (eBioscience/Fisher). Extracellular antibodies were then added and samples were incubated on ice. Intracellular staining was accomplished after surface staining using the FoxP3 staining kit (eBioscience). To evaluate myeloid subsets, total cells were stained with anti-CD11b-FITC, anti-CD45-BV650, anti-Ly6C-AF700, anti-MR-PE-Cy7, anti-CD11c-PE/Dazzle594, and anti-Ly6G-BV605 (BioLegend); anti-MHCII-eFluor450 (eBioscience); anti-CD86-PE (Miltenyi); and anti-F4/80-APC (BioRad). T cells were enumerated by staining with anti-CD45-AF700, anti-CD3-AF488, anti-CD4-PE, anti-CD8-BV655, and anti-CD69-APC-Cy7 (BioLegend), followed by intracellular stain with anti-IFNγ-APC (BioLegend). To evaluate Tregs, total cells were stained with anti-CD3-AF488, anti-CD4-BV605, and anti-CD25-PerCP-Cy5.5 (BioLegend), and then stained intracellularly with anti-FoxP3-PE (BD Pharmingen).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Multiparametric Flow Cytometry of T-Cell Subsets

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
T-cell subsets were enumerated in freshly thawed cryopreserved PBMC. After washing and counting viable cells, PBMCs were surface-stained with the following conjugated mAbs: anti-CD3-AF488 (Biolegend; clone HIT3a), anti CD4-APC/Cy7 (Biolegend; RPA-T4), anti-CD25-PE/Cy7 (Biolegend; BC96), anti-HLA-DR-PerCP/Cy5.5 (Biolegend; L243), anti-CD39-APC (Biolegend; A1), and anti-CD38-PECy7 (Biolegend; HIT2). Cells were fixed and permeabilized with Cytofix/Cytoperm (BD Biosciences), and stained with anti-IL10-APC (R & D Systems; 127107), anti-FOXP3-PE (Biolegend; 206D), anti-TGFβ-PerCP/Cy5.5 (Biolegend; TW4-2F8) and anti-IL35-PE (eBioscience; ebic6) and analyzed with Guava easyCyte 8HT and FlowJo (Treestar).
Subsets were expressed as percentages of the parent CD4+ and CD8+ T-cell populations. The gating strategy is presented in Fig S1.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Comprehensive Immune Cell Profiling

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
B- and T-cell subsets were enumerated in freshly thawed cryopreserved PBMCs. After washing and counting viable cells, PBMCs were surface-stained with the following conjugated mAbs: anti-CD3-AF488 (Biolegend; clone HIT3a), anti CD8-APC/Cy7 (Biolegend; SK1), anti-CD19-APC/Cy7 (BD Biosciences; SJ25C1), anti-CD19-PerCP/Cy5.5 (Biolegend; HiB19) anti-CD25-PE/Cy7 (Biolegend; BC96), anti-CD21-PE/Cy7 (BD Biosciences; B-ly4), anti-CD27-PerCP/Cy5.5 (BD Biosciences; M-T271), anti-CD38-PE/Cy7 (Biolegend; HIT2), anti-HLA-DR-PerCP/Cy5.5 (Biolegend; L243); anti-CD10-FITC (BD Biosciences; W8E7), anti-IL21R-PE (BD Biosciences; 17A12), and anti-CD39-APC (Biolegend; A1). Cells were fixed and permeabilized with Cytofix/Cytoperm (BD Biosciences), and stained with anti-IL-10-PE (R & D Systems; 127107), anti-FOXP3-PE (Biolegend; 206D) and anti- TGFβ-PE (Biolegend; TW4-2F8), and analyzed with Guava easyCyte 8HT and FlowJo (Treestar). Subsets were expressed as percentages of the parent CD4+, CD8+ and CD19+ cell populations. The gating strategy is presented in S2 Fig.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Stimulated CD107a Degranulation Assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Peripheral blood mononuclear cells at 1 × 106 viable cells/ml (final concentration) in complete DMEM/F12 were placed into each of two sterile tubes labeled ‘test’ or ‘control.’ Cells in the ‘test’ tube were incubated with anti-CD107a AF647 (Biolegend) for 15 min, before addition of 1.1 μg/mL SEB (Sigma-Aldrich, United Kingdom) as stimulant and 5 μL ethanol. The ‘control’ sample was not stimulated but had 5 μL (1 μM) colchicine (Sigma, Missouri, United States) in ethanol added to minimize spontaneous degranulation. In both tubes the final volume was adjusted 1 mL with tissue media culture. Tubes were incubated for 5 h at 37°C and 5% CO2, then washed and stained with anti-CD3 AF488 (Biolegend) and anti-CD8 PE (Biolegend). After further washing and fixation with 1% formalin, data were acquired by flow cytometry (EC800 Sony) and analyzed using FlowJo software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!