Futurabond u

Manufactured by Voco dental

Sourced in Germany

Futurabond U is a universal adhesive system for direct and indirect dental restorations. It is a self-etching, self-priming adhesive that creates a durable bond between the tooth structure and the restorative material.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

Lab products found in correlation

Single bond universal, by 3M (2 mentions) Clearfil se bond, by Kuraray (2 mentions) Clearfil tri s bond, by Kuraray (2 mentions) Bifix qm, by Voco dental (2 mentions) Clearfil universal, by Kuraray (1 mentions) Single bond 2, by 3M (1 mentions) Alloy primer, by Kuraray (1 mentions) Elipar s10 led curing light, by 3M (1 mentions)

Spelling variants of this product

Futurabond (2 citations)

4 protocols using futurabond u

Dental Adhesive Protocols for Amalgam Restoration

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols

The amalgam specimens were divided into 12 main groups according to adhesive applications as mentioned belove:

Group 1 – Single Bond Universal (3M ESPE)

Group 2 – Alloy Primer (Kuraray) + Single Bond Universal (3M ESPE)

Group 3 – Futurabond U (Voco)

Group 4 – Alloy Primer (Kuraray) + Futurabond U (Voco)

Group 5 – Clearfil Universal (Kuraray)

Group 6 – Alloy Primer (Kuraray) + Clearfil Universal (Kuraray)

Group 7 – Single Bond 2 (3M ESPE)

Group 8 – Alloy Primer (Kuraray) + Single Bond 2 (3M ESPE)

Group 9 – Clearfil Tri-S Bond (Kuraray)

Group 10 – Alloy Primer (Kuraray) + Clearfil Tri-S Bond (Kuraray)

Group 11 – Clearfil SE Bond (Kuraray)

Group 12 – Alloy Primer (Kuraray) + Clearfil SE Bond (Kuraray).

Balkaya H., Demirbuga S., Çakir N.N., Karadas M, & Zorba Y.O. (2018). Micro-shear bond strength of universal adhesives used for amalgam repair with or without Alloy Primer. Journal of Conservative Dentistry : JCD, 21(3), 274-279.

+ Open protocol

+ Expand

Dental Adhesive Performance Evaluation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols

The composite specimens were divided into 12 Groups according to the adhesive applications as mentioned below:

Group 1: Single bond universal (SBU) (3M ESPE)

Group 2: Silane (Kuraray) + SBU (3M ESPE)

Group 3: Futurabond U (Voco)

Group 4: Silane (Kuraray) + Futurabond U (Voco)

Group 5: All-Bond Universal (ABU) (Bisco)

Group 6: Silane (Kuraray) + ABU (Bisco)

Group 7: Single bond 2 (SB2) (3M ESPE)

Group 8: Silane (Kuraray) + SB2 (3M ESPE)

Group 9: Clearfil Tri-S Bond (TSB) (Kuraray)

Group 10: Silane (Kuraray) + Clearfil TSB (Kuraray)

Group 11: Clearfil SE bond (CSE) (Kuraray)

Group 12: Silane (Kuraray) + CSE (Kuraray).

All adhesive procedures were performed at room temperature (24°C) and 70% relative humidity according to manufacturer's instructions as mentioned in Table 1.

Çakir N.N., Demirbuga S., Balkaya H, & Karadaş M. (2018). Bonding performance of universal adhesives on composite repairs, with or without silane application. Journal of Conservative Dentistry : JCD, 21(3), 263-268.

+ Open protocol

+ Expand

Bonding Orthodontic Brackets Using Dual-Cure Resin

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols

A self-etching adhesive system, Futurabond U (VOCO GmbH, Cuxhaven, Germany) was applied to each specimen and rubbed for 20 s using a microbrush and air-dried for at least 5 s, followed by light curing for 10 s (1200 mW/cm2 3M ESPE, Elipar S10 LED Curing Light, 3M Unitek, Monrovia, Calif.) For the purposes of standardization, a resin composite material that was marketed by the same manufacturer of the adhesive system was selected. Bifix QM (VOCO GmbH, Cuxhaven, Germany) is a dual-cure resin-based adhesive luting system. It was applied onto the maxillary right central incisor metal bracket (American Orthodontics, Sheboygan, Wisconsin, USA) bases. Brackets were placed onto the FC surface with 200 gram-force as determined by a gauge (E.T.M. Corp., Monrovia, California, USA.). The excess resin was cleaned, and the resin was light cured for 20 s each from the mesial and distal sides.

Recen D., Yildirim B., Othman E., Comlekoglu E, & Aras I. (2021). Bond strength of metal brackets to feldspathic ceramic treated with different surface conditioning methods: an in vitro study. European Oral Research, 55(1), 1-7.

+ Open protocol

+ Expand

Indirect Restoration Luting Procedure

Cited 1 time

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols

Following the manufacturer’s recommendations, each indirect restoration was luted using a universal adhesive (Futurabond U, Voco, Cuxhaven, Germany) and a dual-curing cement (Bifix QM, Voco, Cuxhaven, Germany). Prior to silane application, restoration surfaces were etched with 5% hydrofluoric acid for 20 s (LS) and 60 s (PICN), and then cleaned with an ultrasonic bath. After placing the restoration and using brushes to remove any excess cement, the same LED curing light was used for a 60 s light-cure on each side (Valo, Ultradent). After covering the samples with clear air barrier gel, a final polymerization lasting 20 s per side was carried out. Using silicone cups and diamond burs, the surface was finished and polished until smooth [30 (link)].

Comba A., Baldi A., Carossa M., Michelotto Tempesta R., Garino E., Llubani X., Rozzi D., Mikonis J., Paolone G, & Scotti N. (2022). Post-Fatigue Fracture Resistance of Lithium Disilicate and Polymer-Infiltrated Ceramic Network Indirect Restorations over Endodontically-Treated Molars with Different Preparation Designs: An In-Vitro Study. Polymers, 14(23), 5084.

+ Open protocol

+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!